Cargando…

Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?

BACKGROUND: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are not universally measured in colorectal cancers. CEA levels have been reported to be usually normal at time of primary rectal cancer diagnosis but elevated in recurrent disease. The aims of the study were to (1) compare serum CEA levels perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Angela C, Warren, Leigh R, Barreto, Savio G, Williams, Randolph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147281
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon479w
_version_ 1783272627140296704
author Chang, Angela C
Warren, Leigh R
Barreto, Savio G
Williams, Randolph
author_facet Chang, Angela C
Warren, Leigh R
Barreto, Savio G
Williams, Randolph
author_sort Chang, Angela C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are not universally measured in colorectal cancers. CEA levels have been reported to be usually normal at time of primary rectal cancer diagnosis but elevated in recurrent disease. The aims of the study were to (1) compare serum CEA levels performed at time of primary and recurrent colorectal tumour diagnosis; and (2) to determine serum CEA levels in rectal cancers at primary diagnosis to analyse potential factors influencing differing CEA levels. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated for colorectal cancers at Modbury Hospital, South Australia was performed. Each admission was reviewed within the electronic database. Serum CEA levels and tumour-related factors were determined in patients who underwent curative surgery for their primary tumour and developed tumour recurrence/metastases within the study period. RESULTS: 438 patients were treated for colorectal cancer in the study period. In patients who underwent curative surgery and developed a recurrence, serum CEA was elevated in 20% patients at primary diagnosis and in 46.6% patients at recurrence. Only 1 of 30 patients with rectal cancer had an elevated CEA at diagnosis of primary tumour. Tumour relationship to the peritoneal reflection did not appear to play a role. CONCLUSIONS: In rectal cancers, serum CEA levels are often normal at the time of initial diagnosis. However, this should not preclude its use in post-operative surveillance. Serum CEA levels noted in primary rectal cancer appear unrelated to the relationship of the tumour to the peritoneal reflection. Stroma-related factors could possibly be involved and merit further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56498902017-11-16 Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology? Chang, Angela C Warren, Leigh R Barreto, Savio G Williams, Randolph World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are not universally measured in colorectal cancers. CEA levels have been reported to be usually normal at time of primary rectal cancer diagnosis but elevated in recurrent disease. The aims of the study were to (1) compare serum CEA levels performed at time of primary and recurrent colorectal tumour diagnosis; and (2) to determine serum CEA levels in rectal cancers at primary diagnosis to analyse potential factors influencing differing CEA levels. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated for colorectal cancers at Modbury Hospital, South Australia was performed. Each admission was reviewed within the electronic database. Serum CEA levels and tumour-related factors were determined in patients who underwent curative surgery for their primary tumour and developed tumour recurrence/metastases within the study period. RESULTS: 438 patients were treated for colorectal cancer in the study period. In patients who underwent curative surgery and developed a recurrence, serum CEA was elevated in 20% patients at primary diagnosis and in 46.6% patients at recurrence. Only 1 of 30 patients with rectal cancer had an elevated CEA at diagnosis of primary tumour. Tumour relationship to the peritoneal reflection did not appear to play a role. CONCLUSIONS: In rectal cancers, serum CEA levels are often normal at the time of initial diagnosis. However, this should not preclude its use in post-operative surveillance. Serum CEA levels noted in primary rectal cancer appear unrelated to the relationship of the tumour to the peritoneal reflection. Stroma-related factors could possibly be involved and merit further investigation. Elmer Press 2012-04 2012-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5649890/ /pubmed/29147281 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon479w Text en Copyright 2012, Chang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chang, Angela C
Warren, Leigh R
Barreto, Savio G
Williams, Randolph
Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?
title Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?
title_full Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?
title_fullStr Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?
title_full_unstemmed Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?
title_short Differing Serum Cea in Primary and Recurrent Rectal Cancer - A Reflection of Histology?
title_sort differing serum cea in primary and recurrent rectal cancer - a reflection of histology?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147281
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon479w
work_keys_str_mv AT changangelac differingserumceainprimaryandrecurrentrectalcancerareflectionofhistology
AT warrenleighr differingserumceainprimaryandrecurrentrectalcancerareflectionofhistology
AT barretosaviog differingserumceainprimaryandrecurrentrectalcancerareflectionofhistology
AT williamsrandolph differingserumceainprimaryandrecurrentrectalcancerareflectionofhistology