Cargando…

F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy

BACKGROUND: To determine the utility of F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline uptake, in patients with esophageal and esophago-gastric junction tumors who are to undergo either neo-adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, in predicting response (pathological and survival). METHODS: Eighteen patients with biopsy pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suttie, Stuart, McAteer, Dympna, Sheehan, Margaret, Nicolson, Marianne, Schweiger, Lutz, Hammonds, Solveig, Smith, Timothy, Welch, Andrew, Park, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147183
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon2010.04.201w
_version_ 1783272631154245632
author Suttie, Stuart
McAteer, Dympna
Sheehan, Margaret
Nicolson, Marianne
Schweiger, Lutz
Hammonds, Solveig
Smith, Timothy
Welch, Andrew
Park, Kenneth
author_facet Suttie, Stuart
McAteer, Dympna
Sheehan, Margaret
Nicolson, Marianne
Schweiger, Lutz
Hammonds, Solveig
Smith, Timothy
Welch, Andrew
Park, Kenneth
author_sort Suttie, Stuart
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine the utility of F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline uptake, in patients with esophageal and esophago-gastric junction tumors who are to undergo either neo-adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, in predicting response (pathological and survival). METHODS: Eighteen patients with biopsy proven cancer were recruited prospectively. Patients underwent PET imaging before and during the first cycle of chemotherapy (seven and 14 days) with both F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline. Tracer uptake was quantified using Standardized Uptake Values. Pathological tumor response was determined using the Mandard criteria. Cellular proliferation was determined using ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Relationships between tracer uptake and response, one-year survival and cellular proliferation were determined. RESULTS: All 18 tumors were imaged by F-18-FDG PET compared to 16/18 with C-11-Choline. Change in uptake of either tracer did not correlate with pathological response. Pathological response did not influence survival (median-survival, responders = 16.1 months; non-responders = 19.0 months, p = 0.978). There was no significant correlation of change in tracer uptake with survival. C-11-Choline tumor uptake did not correlate with cellular proliferation. CONCLUSION: F-18-FDG PET is superior for imaging of the primary tumor. Neither F-18-FDG nor C-11-Choline PET was able to predict response accurately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5649907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56499072017-11-16 F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy Suttie, Stuart McAteer, Dympna Sheehan, Margaret Nicolson, Marianne Schweiger, Lutz Hammonds, Solveig Smith, Timothy Welch, Andrew Park, Kenneth World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine the utility of F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline uptake, in patients with esophageal and esophago-gastric junction tumors who are to undergo either neo-adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, in predicting response (pathological and survival). METHODS: Eighteen patients with biopsy proven cancer were recruited prospectively. Patients underwent PET imaging before and during the first cycle of chemotherapy (seven and 14 days) with both F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline. Tracer uptake was quantified using Standardized Uptake Values. Pathological tumor response was determined using the Mandard criteria. Cellular proliferation was determined using ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Relationships between tracer uptake and response, one-year survival and cellular proliferation were determined. RESULTS: All 18 tumors were imaged by F-18-FDG PET compared to 16/18 with C-11-Choline. Change in uptake of either tracer did not correlate with pathological response. Pathological response did not influence survival (median-survival, responders = 16.1 months; non-responders = 19.0 months, p = 0.978). There was no significant correlation of change in tracer uptake with survival. C-11-Choline tumor uptake did not correlate with cellular proliferation. CONCLUSION: F-18-FDG PET is superior for imaging of the primary tumor. Neither F-18-FDG nor C-11-Choline PET was able to predict response accurately. Elmer Press 2010-04 2010-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5649907/ /pubmed/29147183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon2010.04.201w Text en Copyright 2010, Suttie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Suttie, Stuart
McAteer, Dympna
Sheehan, Margaret
Nicolson, Marianne
Schweiger, Lutz
Hammonds, Solveig
Smith, Timothy
Welch, Andrew
Park, Kenneth
F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
title F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
title_full F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
title_fullStr F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
title_full_unstemmed F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
title_short F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
title_sort f-18-fdg and c-11-choline positron emission tomography in human esophago-gastric cancer: prediction of response to therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147183
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon2010.04.201w
work_keys_str_mv AT suttiestuart f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT mcateerdympna f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT sheehanmargaret f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT nicolsonmarianne f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT schweigerlutz f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT hammondssolveig f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT smithtimothy f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT welchandrew f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy
AT parkkenneth f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy