Cargando…
F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy
BACKGROUND: To determine the utility of F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline uptake, in patients with esophageal and esophago-gastric junction tumors who are to undergo either neo-adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, in predicting response (pathological and survival). METHODS: Eighteen patients with biopsy pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon2010.04.201w |
_version_ | 1783272631154245632 |
---|---|
author | Suttie, Stuart McAteer, Dympna Sheehan, Margaret Nicolson, Marianne Schweiger, Lutz Hammonds, Solveig Smith, Timothy Welch, Andrew Park, Kenneth |
author_facet | Suttie, Stuart McAteer, Dympna Sheehan, Margaret Nicolson, Marianne Schweiger, Lutz Hammonds, Solveig Smith, Timothy Welch, Andrew Park, Kenneth |
author_sort | Suttie, Stuart |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine the utility of F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline uptake, in patients with esophageal and esophago-gastric junction tumors who are to undergo either neo-adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, in predicting response (pathological and survival). METHODS: Eighteen patients with biopsy proven cancer were recruited prospectively. Patients underwent PET imaging before and during the first cycle of chemotherapy (seven and 14 days) with both F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline. Tracer uptake was quantified using Standardized Uptake Values. Pathological tumor response was determined using the Mandard criteria. Cellular proliferation was determined using ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Relationships between tracer uptake and response, one-year survival and cellular proliferation were determined. RESULTS: All 18 tumors were imaged by F-18-FDG PET compared to 16/18 with C-11-Choline. Change in uptake of either tracer did not correlate with pathological response. Pathological response did not influence survival (median-survival, responders = 16.1 months; non-responders = 19.0 months, p = 0.978). There was no significant correlation of change in tracer uptake with survival. C-11-Choline tumor uptake did not correlate with cellular proliferation. CONCLUSION: F-18-FDG PET is superior for imaging of the primary tumor. Neither F-18-FDG nor C-11-Choline PET was able to predict response accurately. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5649907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56499072017-11-16 F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy Suttie, Stuart McAteer, Dympna Sheehan, Margaret Nicolson, Marianne Schweiger, Lutz Hammonds, Solveig Smith, Timothy Welch, Andrew Park, Kenneth World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine the utility of F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline uptake, in patients with esophageal and esophago-gastric junction tumors who are to undergo either neo-adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, in predicting response (pathological and survival). METHODS: Eighteen patients with biopsy proven cancer were recruited prospectively. Patients underwent PET imaging before and during the first cycle of chemotherapy (seven and 14 days) with both F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline. Tracer uptake was quantified using Standardized Uptake Values. Pathological tumor response was determined using the Mandard criteria. Cellular proliferation was determined using ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Relationships between tracer uptake and response, one-year survival and cellular proliferation were determined. RESULTS: All 18 tumors were imaged by F-18-FDG PET compared to 16/18 with C-11-Choline. Change in uptake of either tracer did not correlate with pathological response. Pathological response did not influence survival (median-survival, responders = 16.1 months; non-responders = 19.0 months, p = 0.978). There was no significant correlation of change in tracer uptake with survival. C-11-Choline tumor uptake did not correlate with cellular proliferation. CONCLUSION: F-18-FDG PET is superior for imaging of the primary tumor. Neither F-18-FDG nor C-11-Choline PET was able to predict response accurately. Elmer Press 2010-04 2010-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5649907/ /pubmed/29147183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon2010.04.201w Text en Copyright 2010, Suttie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Suttie, Stuart McAteer, Dympna Sheehan, Margaret Nicolson, Marianne Schweiger, Lutz Hammonds, Solveig Smith, Timothy Welch, Andrew Park, Kenneth F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy |
title | F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy |
title_full | F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy |
title_fullStr | F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy |
title_short | F-18-FDG and C-11-Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Human Esophago-Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Response to Therapy |
title_sort | f-18-fdg and c-11-choline positron emission tomography in human esophago-gastric cancer: prediction of response to therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147183 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjon2010.04.201w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suttiestuart f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT mcateerdympna f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT sheehanmargaret f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT nicolsonmarianne f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT schweigerlutz f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT hammondssolveig f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT smithtimothy f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT welchandrew f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy AT parkkenneth f18fdgandc11cholinepositronemissiontomographyinhumanesophagogastriccancerpredictionofresponsetotherapy |