Cargando…

Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials

Imaging markers that are reliable, reproducible and sensitive to neurodegenerative changes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) can enhance the development of new medications with a neuroprotective mode-of-action. Accordingly, in recent years, a considerable number of imaging biomarkers have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moccia, Marcello, de Stefano, Nicola, Barkhof, Frederik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517729456
_version_ 1783272647879032832
author Moccia, Marcello
de Stefano, Nicola
Barkhof, Frederik
author_facet Moccia, Marcello
de Stefano, Nicola
Barkhof, Frederik
author_sort Moccia, Marcello
collection PubMed
description Imaging markers that are reliable, reproducible and sensitive to neurodegenerative changes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) can enhance the development of new medications with a neuroprotective mode-of-action. Accordingly, in recent years, a considerable number of imaging biomarkers have been included in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in primary and secondary progressive MS. Brain lesion count and volume are markers of inflammation and demyelination and are important outcomes even in progressive MS trials. Brain and, more recently, spinal cord atrophy are gaining relevance, considering their strong association with disability accrual; ongoing improvements in analysis methods will enhance their applicability in clinical trials, especially for cord atrophy. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (e.g. magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), spectroscopy) have been included in few trials so far and hold promise for the future, as they can reflect specific pathological changes targeted by neuroprotective treatments. Position emission tomography (PET) and optical coherence tomography have yet to be included. Applications, limitations and future perspectives of these techniques in clinical trials in progressive MS are discussed, with emphasis on measurement sensitivity, reliability and sample size calculation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5650056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56500562017-10-31 Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials Moccia, Marcello de Stefano, Nicola Barkhof, Frederik Mult Scler Advancing Trial Design in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Imaging markers that are reliable, reproducible and sensitive to neurodegenerative changes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) can enhance the development of new medications with a neuroprotective mode-of-action. Accordingly, in recent years, a considerable number of imaging biomarkers have been included in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in primary and secondary progressive MS. Brain lesion count and volume are markers of inflammation and demyelination and are important outcomes even in progressive MS trials. Brain and, more recently, spinal cord atrophy are gaining relevance, considering their strong association with disability accrual; ongoing improvements in analysis methods will enhance their applicability in clinical trials, especially for cord atrophy. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (e.g. magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), spectroscopy) have been included in few trials so far and hold promise for the future, as they can reflect specific pathological changes targeted by neuroprotective treatments. Position emission tomography (PET) and optical coherence tomography have yet to be included. Applications, limitations and future perspectives of these techniques in clinical trials in progressive MS are discussed, with emphasis on measurement sensitivity, reliability and sample size calculation. SAGE Publications 2017-10-18 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5650056/ /pubmed/29041865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517729456 Text en © The Author(s), 2017 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Advancing Trial Design in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Moccia, Marcello
de Stefano, Nicola
Barkhof, Frederik
Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
title Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
title_full Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
title_fullStr Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
title_full_unstemmed Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
title_short Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
title_sort imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials
topic Advancing Trial Design in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29041865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517729456
work_keys_str_mv AT mocciamarcello imagingoutcomemeasuresforprogressivemultiplesclerosistrials
AT destefanonicola imagingoutcomemeasuresforprogressivemultiplesclerosistrials
AT barkhoffrederik imagingoutcomemeasuresforprogressivemultiplesclerosistrials