Cargando…

The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations

Natural, also referred to as spontaneous wine fermentations, are carried out by the native microbiota of the grape juice, without inoculation of selected, industrially produced yeast or bacterial strains. Such fermentations are commonly initiated by non-Saccharomyces yeast species that numerically d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagheri, Bahareh, Bauer, Florian F., Setati, Mathabatha E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085347
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01988
_version_ 1783272732952100864
author Bagheri, Bahareh
Bauer, Florian F.
Setati, Mathabatha E.
author_facet Bagheri, Bahareh
Bauer, Florian F.
Setati, Mathabatha E.
author_sort Bagheri, Bahareh
collection PubMed
description Natural, also referred to as spontaneous wine fermentations, are carried out by the native microbiota of the grape juice, without inoculation of selected, industrially produced yeast or bacterial strains. Such fermentations are commonly initiated by non-Saccharomyces yeast species that numerically dominate the must. Community composition and numerical dominance of species vary significantly between individual musts, but Saccharomyces cerevisiae will in most cases dominate the late stages of the fermentation and complete the process. Nevertheless, non-Saccharomyces species contribute significantly, positively or negatively, to the character and quality of the final product. The contribution is species and strain dependent and will depend on each species or strain’s absolute and relative contribution to total metabolically active biomass, and will therefore, be a function of its relative fitness within the microbial ecosystem. However, the population dynamics of multispecies fermentations are not well understood. Consequently, the oenological potential of the microbiome in any given grape must, can currently not be evaluated or predicted. To better characterize the rules that govern the complex wine microbial ecosystem, a model yeast consortium comprising eight species commonly encountered in South African grape musts and an ARISA based method to monitor their dynamics were developed and validated. The dynamics of these species were evaluated in synthetic must in the presence or absence of S. cerevisiae using direct viable counts and ARISA. The data show that S. cerevisiae specifically suppresses certain species while appearing to favor the persistence of other species. Growth dynamics in Chenin blanc grape must fermentation was monitored only through viable counts. The interactions observed in the synthetic must, were upheld in the natural must fermentations, suggesting the broad applicability of the observed ecosystem dynamics. Importantly, the presence of indigenous yeast populations did not appear to affect the broad interaction patterns between the consortium species. The data show that the wine ecosystem is characterized by both mutually supportive and inhibitory species. The current study presents a first step in the development of a model to predict the oenological potential of any given wine mycobiome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5650610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56506102017-10-30 The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations Bagheri, Bahareh Bauer, Florian F. Setati, Mathabatha E. Front Microbiol Microbiology Natural, also referred to as spontaneous wine fermentations, are carried out by the native microbiota of the grape juice, without inoculation of selected, industrially produced yeast or bacterial strains. Such fermentations are commonly initiated by non-Saccharomyces yeast species that numerically dominate the must. Community composition and numerical dominance of species vary significantly between individual musts, but Saccharomyces cerevisiae will in most cases dominate the late stages of the fermentation and complete the process. Nevertheless, non-Saccharomyces species contribute significantly, positively or negatively, to the character and quality of the final product. The contribution is species and strain dependent and will depend on each species or strain’s absolute and relative contribution to total metabolically active biomass, and will therefore, be a function of its relative fitness within the microbial ecosystem. However, the population dynamics of multispecies fermentations are not well understood. Consequently, the oenological potential of the microbiome in any given grape must, can currently not be evaluated or predicted. To better characterize the rules that govern the complex wine microbial ecosystem, a model yeast consortium comprising eight species commonly encountered in South African grape musts and an ARISA based method to monitor their dynamics were developed and validated. The dynamics of these species were evaluated in synthetic must in the presence or absence of S. cerevisiae using direct viable counts and ARISA. The data show that S. cerevisiae specifically suppresses certain species while appearing to favor the persistence of other species. Growth dynamics in Chenin blanc grape must fermentation was monitored only through viable counts. The interactions observed in the synthetic must, were upheld in the natural must fermentations, suggesting the broad applicability of the observed ecosystem dynamics. Importantly, the presence of indigenous yeast populations did not appear to affect the broad interaction patterns between the consortium species. The data show that the wine ecosystem is characterized by both mutually supportive and inhibitory species. The current study presents a first step in the development of a model to predict the oenological potential of any given wine mycobiome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5650610/ /pubmed/29085347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01988 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bagheri, Bauer and Setati. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Bagheri, Bahareh
Bauer, Florian F.
Setati, Mathabatha E.
The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations
title The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations
title_full The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations
title_fullStr The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations
title_short The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations
title_sort impact of saccharomyces cerevisiae on a wine yeast consortium in natural and inoculated fermentations
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085347
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01988
work_keys_str_mv AT bagheribahareh theimpactofsaccharomycescerevisiaeonawineyeastconsortiuminnaturalandinoculatedfermentations
AT bauerflorianf theimpactofsaccharomycescerevisiaeonawineyeastconsortiuminnaturalandinoculatedfermentations
AT setatimathabathae theimpactofsaccharomycescerevisiaeonawineyeastconsortiuminnaturalandinoculatedfermentations
AT bagheribahareh impactofsaccharomycescerevisiaeonawineyeastconsortiuminnaturalandinoculatedfermentations
AT bauerflorianf impactofsaccharomycescerevisiaeonawineyeastconsortiuminnaturalandinoculatedfermentations
AT setatimathabathae impactofsaccharomycescerevisiaeonawineyeastconsortiuminnaturalandinoculatedfermentations