Cargando…
Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures
Objective: Computerized training for cognitive enhancement is of great public interest, however, there is inconsistent evidence for the transfer of training gains to every day activity. Several large trials have focused on speed of processing (SOP) training with some promising findings for long-term...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29089888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00338 |
_version_ | 1783272810276192256 |
---|---|
author | Eramudugolla, Ranmalee Kiely, Kim M. Chopra, Sidhant Anstey, Kaarin J. |
author_facet | Eramudugolla, Ranmalee Kiely, Kim M. Chopra, Sidhant Anstey, Kaarin J. |
author_sort | Eramudugolla, Ranmalee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Computerized training for cognitive enhancement is of great public interest, however, there is inconsistent evidence for the transfer of training gains to every day activity. Several large trials have focused on speed of processing (SOP) training with some promising findings for long-term effects on daily activity, but no immediate transfer to other cognitive tests. Here, we examine the transfer of SOP training gains to cognitive measures that are known predictors of driving safety in older adults. Methods: Fifty-three adults aged 65–87 years who were current drivers participated in a two group non-randomized design with repeated measures and a no-contact matched control group. The Intervention group completed an average of 7.9 (SD = 3.0) hours of self-administered online SOP training at home. Control group was matched on age, gender and test-re-test interval. Measures included the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test, a Hazard Perception test, choice reaction time (Cars RT), Trail Making Test B, a Maze test, visual motion threshold, as well as road craft and road knowledge tests. Results: Speed of processing training resulted in significant improvement in processing speed on the UFOV test relative to controls, with an average change of -45.8 ms (SE = 14.5), and effect size of ω(2) = 0.21. Performance on the Maze test also improved, but significant slowing on the Hazard Perception test was observed after SOP training. Training effects on the UFOV task was associated with similar effects on the Cars RT, but not the Hazard Perception and Maze tests, suggesting transfer to some but not all driving related measures. There were no effects of training on any of the other measures examined. Conclusion: Speed of processing training effects on the UFOV task can be achieved with self-administered, online training at home, with some transfer to other cognitive tests. However, differential effects of training may be observed for tasks requiring goal-directed search strategies rather than diffuse attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5651014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56510142017-10-31 Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures Eramudugolla, Ranmalee Kiely, Kim M. Chopra, Sidhant Anstey, Kaarin J. Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: Computerized training for cognitive enhancement is of great public interest, however, there is inconsistent evidence for the transfer of training gains to every day activity. Several large trials have focused on speed of processing (SOP) training with some promising findings for long-term effects on daily activity, but no immediate transfer to other cognitive tests. Here, we examine the transfer of SOP training gains to cognitive measures that are known predictors of driving safety in older adults. Methods: Fifty-three adults aged 65–87 years who were current drivers participated in a two group non-randomized design with repeated measures and a no-contact matched control group. The Intervention group completed an average of 7.9 (SD = 3.0) hours of self-administered online SOP training at home. Control group was matched on age, gender and test-re-test interval. Measures included the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test, a Hazard Perception test, choice reaction time (Cars RT), Trail Making Test B, a Maze test, visual motion threshold, as well as road craft and road knowledge tests. Results: Speed of processing training resulted in significant improvement in processing speed on the UFOV test relative to controls, with an average change of -45.8 ms (SE = 14.5), and effect size of ω(2) = 0.21. Performance on the Maze test also improved, but significant slowing on the Hazard Perception test was observed after SOP training. Training effects on the UFOV task was associated with similar effects on the Cars RT, but not the Hazard Perception and Maze tests, suggesting transfer to some but not all driving related measures. There were no effects of training on any of the other measures examined. Conclusion: Speed of processing training effects on the UFOV task can be achieved with self-administered, online training at home, with some transfer to other cognitive tests. However, differential effects of training may be observed for tasks requiring goal-directed search strategies rather than diffuse attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5651014/ /pubmed/29089888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00338 Text en Copyright © 2017 Eramudugolla, Kiely, Chopra and Anstey. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Eramudugolla, Ranmalee Kiely, Kim M. Chopra, Sidhant Anstey, Kaarin J. Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures |
title | Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures |
title_full | Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures |
title_fullStr | Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures |
title_short | Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Older Driver Screening Measures |
title_sort | effect of speed of processing training on older driver screening measures |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29089888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eramudugollaranmalee effectofspeedofprocessingtrainingonolderdriverscreeningmeasures AT kielykimm effectofspeedofprocessingtrainingonolderdriverscreeningmeasures AT choprasidhant effectofspeedofprocessingtrainingonolderdriverscreeningmeasures AT ansteykaarinj effectofspeedofprocessingtrainingonolderdriverscreeningmeasures |