Cargando…

Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry

PURPOSE: To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alnawaiseh, Maged, Hömberg, Lisann, Eter, Nicole, Prokosch, Verena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8014294
_version_ 1783272834097741824
author Alnawaiseh, Maged
Hömberg, Lisann
Eter, Nicole
Prokosch, Verena
author_facet Alnawaiseh, Maged
Hömberg, Lisann
Eter, Nicole
Prokosch, Verena
author_sort Alnawaiseh, Maged
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depending on the RNFLT, patients were assigned to the glaucoma group (group A: RNFL score 3–6) or the control group (group B: RNFL score 0–2). Structure-function relationships between RNFLT and mean sensitivity (MS) measured by SAP and PP were analyzed. RESULTS: Throughout the entire group, the MS assessed by PP and SAP correlated significantly with RNFLT in all sectors. In the glaucoma group, there was no significant difference between the correlations RNFL-SAP and RNFL-PP, whereas a significant difference was found in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In the control group, the correlation between structure and function based on the PP data was significantly stronger than that based on SAP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5651118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56511182017-11-08 Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry Alnawaiseh, Maged Hömberg, Lisann Eter, Nicole Prokosch, Verena J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depending on the RNFLT, patients were assigned to the glaucoma group (group A: RNFL score 3–6) or the control group (group B: RNFL score 0–2). Structure-function relationships between RNFLT and mean sensitivity (MS) measured by SAP and PP were analyzed. RESULTS: Throughout the entire group, the MS assessed by PP and SAP correlated significantly with RNFLT in all sectors. In the glaucoma group, there was no significant difference between the correlations RNFL-SAP and RNFL-PP, whereas a significant difference was found in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In the control group, the correlation between structure and function based on the PP data was significantly stronger than that based on SAP. Hindawi 2017 2017-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5651118/ /pubmed/29119021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8014294 Text en Copyright © 2017 Maged Alnawaiseh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alnawaiseh, Maged
Hömberg, Lisann
Eter, Nicole
Prokosch, Verena
Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_full Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_fullStr Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_short Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_sort comparison between the correlations of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual field defects in standard automated white-on-white perimetry versus pulsar perimetry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29119021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8014294
work_keys_str_mv AT alnawaisehmaged comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry
AT homberglisann comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry
AT eternicole comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry
AT prokoschverena comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry