Cargando…

Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI

BACKGROUND: It is common for patients diagnosed with medial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to have extrahippocampal damage. However, it is unclear whether microstructural extrahippocampal abnormalities are consistent enough to enable classification using diffusion MRI imaging. Therefore, we implemente...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Del Gaizo, John, Mofrad, Neda, Jensen, Jens H., Clark, David, Glenn, Russell, Helpern, Joseph, Bonilha, Leonardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.801
_version_ 1783272881180901376
author Del Gaizo, John
Mofrad, Neda
Jensen, Jens H.
Clark, David
Glenn, Russell
Helpern, Joseph
Bonilha, Leonardo
author_facet Del Gaizo, John
Mofrad, Neda
Jensen, Jens H.
Clark, David
Glenn, Russell
Helpern, Joseph
Bonilha, Leonardo
author_sort Del Gaizo, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is common for patients diagnosed with medial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to have extrahippocampal damage. However, it is unclear whether microstructural extrahippocampal abnormalities are consistent enough to enable classification using diffusion MRI imaging. Therefore, we implemented a support vector machine (SVM)‐based method to predict TLE from three different imaging modalities: mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), and fractional anisotropy (FA). While MD and FA can be calculated from traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), MK requires diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). METHODS: Thirty‐two TLE patients and 36 healthy controls underwent DKI imaging. To measure predictive capability, a fivefold cross‐validation (CV) was repeated for 1000 iterations. An ensemble of SVM models, each with a different regularization value, was trained with the subject images in the training set, and had performance assessed on the test set. The different regularization values were determined using a Bayesian‐based method. RESULTS: Mean kurtosis achieved higher accuracy than both FA and MD on every iteration, and had far superior average accuracy: 0.82 (MK), 0.68 (FA), and 0.51 (MD). Finally, the MK voxels with the highest coefficients in the predictive models were distributed within the inferior medial aspect of the temporal lobes. CONCLUSION: These results corroborate our earlier publications which indicated that DKI shows more promise in identifying TLE‐associated pathological features than DTI. Also, the locations of the contributory MK voxels were in areas with high fiber crossing and complex fiber anatomy. These traits result in non‐Gaussian water diffusion, and hence render DTI less likely to detect abnormalities. If the location of consistent microstructural abnormalities can be better understood, then it may be possible in the future to identify the various phenotypes of TLE. This is important since treatment outcome varies dependent on type of TLE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5651385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56513852017-10-26 Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI Del Gaizo, John Mofrad, Neda Jensen, Jens H. Clark, David Glenn, Russell Helpern, Joseph Bonilha, Leonardo Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: It is common for patients diagnosed with medial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to have extrahippocampal damage. However, it is unclear whether microstructural extrahippocampal abnormalities are consistent enough to enable classification using diffusion MRI imaging. Therefore, we implemented a support vector machine (SVM)‐based method to predict TLE from three different imaging modalities: mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), and fractional anisotropy (FA). While MD and FA can be calculated from traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), MK requires diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). METHODS: Thirty‐two TLE patients and 36 healthy controls underwent DKI imaging. To measure predictive capability, a fivefold cross‐validation (CV) was repeated for 1000 iterations. An ensemble of SVM models, each with a different regularization value, was trained with the subject images in the training set, and had performance assessed on the test set. The different regularization values were determined using a Bayesian‐based method. RESULTS: Mean kurtosis achieved higher accuracy than both FA and MD on every iteration, and had far superior average accuracy: 0.82 (MK), 0.68 (FA), and 0.51 (MD). Finally, the MK voxels with the highest coefficients in the predictive models were distributed within the inferior medial aspect of the temporal lobes. CONCLUSION: These results corroborate our earlier publications which indicated that DKI shows more promise in identifying TLE‐associated pathological features than DTI. Also, the locations of the contributory MK voxels were in areas with high fiber crossing and complex fiber anatomy. These traits result in non‐Gaussian water diffusion, and hence render DTI less likely to detect abnormalities. If the location of consistent microstructural abnormalities can be better understood, then it may be possible in the future to identify the various phenotypes of TLE. This is important since treatment outcome varies dependent on type of TLE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5651385/ /pubmed/29075561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.801 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Del Gaizo, John
Mofrad, Neda
Jensen, Jens H.
Clark, David
Glenn, Russell
Helpern, Joseph
Bonilha, Leonardo
Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI
title Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI
title_full Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI
title_fullStr Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI
title_short Using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion MRI
title_sort using machine learning to classify temporal lobe epilepsy based on diffusion mri
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29075561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.801
work_keys_str_mv AT delgaizojohn usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri
AT mofradneda usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri
AT jensenjensh usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri
AT clarkdavid usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri
AT glennrussell usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri
AT helpernjoseph usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri
AT bonilhaleonardo usingmachinelearningtoclassifytemporallobeepilepsybasedondiffusionmri