Cargando…
Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Conduct a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analysis to determine the effects of exercise (aerobic, strength or both) on cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) in adults with any type of cancer. METHODS: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of previous randomized controll...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5 |
_version_ | 1783272917535031296 |
---|---|
author | Kelley, George A. Kelley, Kristi S. |
author_facet | Kelley, George A. Kelley, Kristi S. |
author_sort | Kelley, George A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conduct a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analysis to determine the effects of exercise (aerobic, strength or both) on cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) in adults with any type of cancer. METHODS: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of previous randomized controlled trials published through July of 2016 were included by searching six electronic databases and cross-referencing. Dual-selection and data abstraction were conducted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Standardized mean differences (SMD) that were pooled using random-effects models were included as the effect size. In addition, 95% prediction intervals (PI), number needed-to-treat (NNT) and percentile improvements were calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen studies representing 2 to 48 SMD effect sizes per analysis (mean ± SD, 7 ± 8, median = 5) and 37 to 3254 participants (mean ± SD, 633 ± 690, median = 400) were included. Length of training lasted from 3 to 52 weeks (mean ± SD, 14.6 ± 3.1, median = 14), frequency from 1 to 10 times per week (mean ± SD, 3.4 ± 0.8, median = 3), and duration from 10 to 120 min per session (mean ± SD, 44.3 ± 5.5, median = 45). Adjusted AMSTAR scores ranged from 44.4% to 80.0% (mean ± SD, 68.8% ± 12.0%, median = 72.5%). Overall, mean SMD improvements in CRF ranged from −1.05 to −0.01, with 22 of 55 meta-analytic results (52.7%) statistically significant (non-overlapping 95% CI). When PI were calculated for results with non-overlapping 95% CI, only 3 of 25 (12%) yielded non-overlapping 95% PI favoring reductions in CRF. Number needed-to-treat and percentile improvements ranged from 3 to 16 and 4.4 to 26.4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of certainty exists regarding the benefits of exercise on CRF in adults. However, exercise does not appear to increase CRF in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration # CRD42016045405. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5651567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56515672017-10-26 Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses Kelley, George A. Kelley, Kristi S. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Conduct a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analysis to determine the effects of exercise (aerobic, strength or both) on cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) in adults with any type of cancer. METHODS: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of previous randomized controlled trials published through July of 2016 were included by searching six electronic databases and cross-referencing. Dual-selection and data abstraction were conducted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Standardized mean differences (SMD) that were pooled using random-effects models were included as the effect size. In addition, 95% prediction intervals (PI), number needed-to-treat (NNT) and percentile improvements were calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen studies representing 2 to 48 SMD effect sizes per analysis (mean ± SD, 7 ± 8, median = 5) and 37 to 3254 participants (mean ± SD, 633 ± 690, median = 400) were included. Length of training lasted from 3 to 52 weeks (mean ± SD, 14.6 ± 3.1, median = 14), frequency from 1 to 10 times per week (mean ± SD, 3.4 ± 0.8, median = 3), and duration from 10 to 120 min per session (mean ± SD, 44.3 ± 5.5, median = 45). Adjusted AMSTAR scores ranged from 44.4% to 80.0% (mean ± SD, 68.8% ± 12.0%, median = 72.5%). Overall, mean SMD improvements in CRF ranged from −1.05 to −0.01, with 22 of 55 meta-analytic results (52.7%) statistically significant (non-overlapping 95% CI). When PI were calculated for results with non-overlapping 95% CI, only 3 of 25 (12%) yielded non-overlapping 95% PI favoring reductions in CRF. Number needed-to-treat and percentile improvements ranged from 3 to 16 and 4.4 to 26.4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of certainty exists regarding the benefits of exercise on CRF in adults. However, exercise does not appear to increase CRF in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration # CRD42016045405. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5651567/ /pubmed/29058631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kelley, George A. Kelley, Kristi S. Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
title | Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
title_full | Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
title_short | Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
title_sort | exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kelleygeorgea exerciseandcancerrelatedfatigueinadultsasystematicreviewofprevioussystematicreviewswithmetaanalyses AT kelleykristis exerciseandcancerrelatedfatigueinadultsasystematicreviewofprevioussystematicreviewswithmetaanalyses |