Cargando…
Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5 |
_version_ | 1783272934977044480 |
---|---|
author | Dugernier, Jonathan Ehrmann, Stephan Sottiaux, Thierry Roeseler, Jean Wittebole, Xavier Dugernier, Thierry Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Reychler, Gregory |
author_facet | Dugernier, Jonathan Ehrmann, Stephan Sottiaux, Thierry Roeseler, Jean Wittebole, Xavier Dugernier, Thierry Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Reychler, Gregory |
author_sort | Dugernier, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. METHODS: In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. RESULTS: Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5651640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56516402017-10-26 Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review Dugernier, Jonathan Ehrmann, Stephan Sottiaux, Thierry Roeseler, Jean Wittebole, Xavier Dugernier, Thierry Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Reychler, Gregory Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. METHODS: In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. RESULTS: Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5651640/ /pubmed/29058607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dugernier, Jonathan Ehrmann, Stephan Sottiaux, Thierry Roeseler, Jean Wittebole, Xavier Dugernier, Thierry Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Reychler, Gregory Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
title | Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
title_full | Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
title_short | Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
title_sort | aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dugernierjonathan aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT ehrmannstephan aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT sottiauxthierry aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT roeselerjean aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT wittebolexavier aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT dugernierthierry aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT jamarfrancois aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT laterrepierrefrancois aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview AT reychlergregory aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview |