Cargando…

Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugernier, Jonathan, Ehrmann, Stephan, Sottiaux, Thierry, Roeseler, Jean, Wittebole, Xavier, Dugernier, Thierry, Jamar, François, Laterre, Pierre-François, Reychler, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5
_version_ 1783272934977044480
author Dugernier, Jonathan
Ehrmann, Stephan
Sottiaux, Thierry
Roeseler, Jean
Wittebole, Xavier
Dugernier, Thierry
Jamar, François
Laterre, Pierre-François
Reychler, Gregory
author_facet Dugernier, Jonathan
Ehrmann, Stephan
Sottiaux, Thierry
Roeseler, Jean
Wittebole, Xavier
Dugernier, Thierry
Jamar, François
Laterre, Pierre-François
Reychler, Gregory
author_sort Dugernier, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. METHODS: In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. RESULTS: Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5651640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56516402017-10-26 Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review Dugernier, Jonathan Ehrmann, Stephan Sottiaux, Thierry Roeseler, Jean Wittebole, Xavier Dugernier, Thierry Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Reychler, Gregory Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed. METHODS: In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias. RESULTS: Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406–12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5651640/ /pubmed/29058607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dugernier, Jonathan
Ehrmann, Stephan
Sottiaux, Thierry
Roeseler, Jean
Wittebole, Xavier
Dugernier, Thierry
Jamar, François
Laterre, Pierre-François
Reychler, Gregory
Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
title Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
title_full Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
title_short Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
title_sort aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1844-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dugernierjonathan aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT ehrmannstephan aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT sottiauxthierry aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT roeselerjean aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT wittebolexavier aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT dugernierthierry aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT jamarfrancois aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT laterrepierrefrancois aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview
AT reychlergregory aerosoldeliveryduringinvasivemechanicalventilationasystematicreview