Cargando…
A naked-eye comparison of image quality between a portable versus a fixed camera system for digital flexible ureterorenoscopy – A single centre experience
OBJECTIVE: To assess the image quality using the portable OTV-SI (Olympus, Southend, UK) light source system compared to a dedicated fixed standard stack system for flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) as judged by the human eye. METHODS: We compared two differing flexible URS set-ups. The first was our...
Autores principales: | El Howairis, Mohamed, Buchholz, Noor |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5651947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.03.003 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Novel technologies in flexible ureterorenoscopy()
por: Papatsoris, Athanasios G., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Flexible ureterorenoscopy: Tips and tricks
por: Somani, Bhaskar Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
por: Knoll, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy in children
por: Yeow, When-Chan, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy
por: Jung, Helene, et al.
Publicado: (2015)