Cargando…
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion
INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spine disease is increasingly common. There are many spinal fusion techniques used to treat degenerative spine disease. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique in posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_331_16 |
_version_ | 1783273001641312256 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Low Yong Idris, Zamzuri Beng, Tan Boon Young, Teo Yian Chek, Wong Chung Abdullah, Jafri Malin Hieng, Wong Sii |
author_facet | Lee, Low Yong Idris, Zamzuri Beng, Tan Boon Young, Teo Yian Chek, Wong Chung Abdullah, Jafri Malin Hieng, Wong Sii |
author_sort | Lee, Low Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spine disease is increasingly common. There are many spinal fusion techniques used to treat degenerative spine disease. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique in posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion in degenerative spine disease and to evaluate the perioperative outcome and complications between MIS and open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study conducted on all degenerative spine disease patients who underwent both methods of posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion from 2010 to 2014 by the Orthopedic and Neurosurgery Department, Sarawak General Hospital. The analyzed variables were method of surgery and the levels involved, demographic data, estimated blood loss, duration of operation, length of hospitalization, visual analog scale of back pain and radicular pain preoperative, postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and functional outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion from 2010 to 2014. Seventy patients were subjected to MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and 52 open TLIF. Total 89 patients underwent single level of lumbar fusion with sixty patients in MIS group and 29 in open surgeries. MIS TLIF has less estimated blood loss and shorter hospitalization and longer operation time compared to open TLIF, which were statistically significance. MIS TLIF has statistically significance better functional outcome based on Oswestry disability index, Modified NASS score, and RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 score. Complications such as infection, new onsets of neurological, and dural tear are equal in both methods of surgery. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that MIS has better functional outcome compared to open TLIF with shorter hospitalization, faster return to work, and less estimated blood loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5652086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56520862017-11-07 Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion Lee, Low Yong Idris, Zamzuri Beng, Tan Boon Young, Teo Yian Chek, Wong Chung Abdullah, Jafri Malin Hieng, Wong Sii Asian J Neurosurg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spine disease is increasingly common. There are many spinal fusion techniques used to treat degenerative spine disease. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique in posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion in degenerative spine disease and to evaluate the perioperative outcome and complications between MIS and open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study conducted on all degenerative spine disease patients who underwent both methods of posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion from 2010 to 2014 by the Orthopedic and Neurosurgery Department, Sarawak General Hospital. The analyzed variables were method of surgery and the levels involved, demographic data, estimated blood loss, duration of operation, length of hospitalization, visual analog scale of back pain and radicular pain preoperative, postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and functional outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion from 2010 to 2014. Seventy patients were subjected to MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and 52 open TLIF. Total 89 patients underwent single level of lumbar fusion with sixty patients in MIS group and 29 in open surgeries. MIS TLIF has less estimated blood loss and shorter hospitalization and longer operation time compared to open TLIF, which were statistically significance. MIS TLIF has statistically significance better functional outcome based on Oswestry disability index, Modified NASS score, and RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 score. Complications such as infection, new onsets of neurological, and dural tear are equal in both methods of surgery. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that MIS has better functional outcome compared to open TLIF with shorter hospitalization, faster return to work, and less estimated blood loss. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5652086/ /pubmed/29114274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_331_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Low Yong Idris, Zamzuri Beng, Tan Boon Young, Teo Yian Chek, Wong Chung Abdullah, Jafri Malin Hieng, Wong Sii Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion |
title | Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion |
title_full | Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion |
title_short | Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion |
title_sort | outcomes of minimally invasive surgery compared to open posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_331_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leelowyong outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion AT idriszamzuri outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion AT bengtanboon outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion AT youngteoyian outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion AT chekwongchung outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion AT abdullahjafrimalin outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion AT hiengwongsii outcomesofminimallyinvasivesurgerycomparedtoopenposteriorlumbarinstrumentationandfusion |