Cargando…
Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players
BACKGROUND/AIM: Concussions in rugby union pose a major threat to player welfare. Research has found protective headgear offers no significant protection against concussions but suggests a large proportion of players perceive headgear to be effective in preventing concussions. This study aimed to ex...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000255 |
_version_ | 1783273063801946112 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Andrew Rumbold, James L Olusoga, Peter |
author_facet | Barnes, Andrew Rumbold, James L Olusoga, Peter |
author_sort | Barnes, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: Concussions in rugby union pose a major threat to player welfare. Research has found protective headgear offers no significant protection against concussions but suggests a large proportion of players perceive headgear to be effective in preventing concussions. This study aimed to explore UK rugby union players’ attitudes towards wearing protective headgear. METHODS: 545 rugby union players (85% male) from a range of playing standards completed an online survey. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on player attitudes towards protective headgear use. Descriptive statistics, multiple regressions and content analysis were used to analyse the responses. RESULTS: 37% of players believed that headgear was effective in preventing head injuries. Playing group was found to be inversely associated with headgear effectiveness (∆R(2)=0.01, B=−0.13, p=0.02), with youth players holding stronger beliefs that headgear is effective at preventing head injuries compared with all senior groups. The main reasons cited for wearing headgear related to protection from minor injuries (55%) with only 10% of responses related to concussion prevention. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a good awareness in UK players that protective headgear is not effective at preventing concussions. Continued education is vital to ensure players are fully aware of the limitations of headgear, and players who wear it do not engage in overly reckless behaviours as a result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5652465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56524652017-10-27 Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players Barnes, Andrew Rumbold, James L Olusoga, Peter BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIM: Concussions in rugby union pose a major threat to player welfare. Research has found protective headgear offers no significant protection against concussions but suggests a large proportion of players perceive headgear to be effective in preventing concussions. This study aimed to explore UK rugby union players’ attitudes towards wearing protective headgear. METHODS: 545 rugby union players (85% male) from a range of playing standards completed an online survey. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected on player attitudes towards protective headgear use. Descriptive statistics, multiple regressions and content analysis were used to analyse the responses. RESULTS: 37% of players believed that headgear was effective in preventing head injuries. Playing group was found to be inversely associated with headgear effectiveness (∆R(2)=0.01, B=−0.13, p=0.02), with youth players holding stronger beliefs that headgear is effective at preventing head injuries compared with all senior groups. The main reasons cited for wearing headgear related to protection from minor injuries (55%) with only 10% of responses related to concussion prevention. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a good awareness in UK players that protective headgear is not effective at preventing concussions. Continued education is vital to ensure players are fully aware of the limitations of headgear, and players who wear it do not engage in overly reckless behaviours as a result. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5652465/ /pubmed/29081983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000255 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Barnes, Andrew Rumbold, James L Olusoga, Peter Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players |
title | Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players |
title_full | Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players |
title_fullStr | Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players |
title_full_unstemmed | Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players |
title_short | Attitudes towards protective headgear in UK rugby union players |
title_sort | attitudes towards protective headgear in uk rugby union players |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnesandrew attitudestowardsprotectiveheadgearinukrugbyunionplayers AT rumboldjamesl attitudestowardsprotectiveheadgearinukrugbyunionplayers AT olusogapeter attitudestowardsprotectiveheadgearinukrugbyunionplayers |