Cargando…

Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of midwives administering misoprostol to women with incomplete abortion seeking post-abortion care (PAC), compared with physicians. DESIGN: A multicentre randomised controlled equivalence trial. The study was not masked. SETTINGS: Gynaecological departments in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makenzius, Marlene, Oguttu, Monica, Klingberg-Allvin, Marie, Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina, Odero, Theresa M A, Faxelid, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016157
_version_ 1783273068427214848
author Makenzius, Marlene
Oguttu, Monica
Klingberg-Allvin, Marie
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Odero, Theresa M A
Faxelid, Elisabeth
author_facet Makenzius, Marlene
Oguttu, Monica
Klingberg-Allvin, Marie
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Odero, Theresa M A
Faxelid, Elisabeth
author_sort Makenzius, Marlene
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of midwives administering misoprostol to women with incomplete abortion seeking post-abortion care (PAC), compared with physicians. DESIGN: A multicentre randomised controlled equivalence trial. The study was not masked. SETTINGS: Gynaecological departments in two hospitals in a low-resource setting, Kenya. POPULATION: Women (n=1094) with incomplete abortion in the first trimester, seeking PAC between 1 June 2013 to 31 May 2016. Participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment from midwives or physicians. 409 and 401 women in the midwife and physician groups, respectively, were included in the per-protocol analysis. INTERVENTIONS: 600 µg misoprostol orally, and contraceptive counselling by a physician or midwife. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete abortion not needing surgical intervention within 7–10 days. The main outcome was analysed on the per-protocol population with a generalised estimating equation model. The predefined equivalence range was –4% to 4%. Secondary outcomes were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: The proportion of complete abortion was 94.8% (768/810): 390 (95.4%) in the midwife group and 378 (94.3%) in the physician group. The proportion of incomplete abortion was 5.2% (42/810), similarly distributed between midwives and physicians. The model-based risk difference for midwives versus physicians was 1.0% (–4.1 to 2.2). Most women felt safe (97%; 779/799), and 93% (748/801) perceived the treatment as expected/easier than expected. After contraceptive counselling the uptake of a contraceptive method after 7–10 days occurred in 76% (613/810). No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives is equally effective, safe and accepted by women as when administered by physicians in a low-resource setting. Systematically provided contraceptive counselling in PAC is effective to mitigate unmet need for contraception. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01865136; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56524922017-10-27 Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya Makenzius, Marlene Oguttu, Monica Klingberg-Allvin, Marie Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina Odero, Theresa M A Faxelid, Elisabeth BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of midwives administering misoprostol to women with incomplete abortion seeking post-abortion care (PAC), compared with physicians. DESIGN: A multicentre randomised controlled equivalence trial. The study was not masked. SETTINGS: Gynaecological departments in two hospitals in a low-resource setting, Kenya. POPULATION: Women (n=1094) with incomplete abortion in the first trimester, seeking PAC between 1 June 2013 to 31 May 2016. Participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment from midwives or physicians. 409 and 401 women in the midwife and physician groups, respectively, were included in the per-protocol analysis. INTERVENTIONS: 600 µg misoprostol orally, and contraceptive counselling by a physician or midwife. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete abortion not needing surgical intervention within 7–10 days. The main outcome was analysed on the per-protocol population with a generalised estimating equation model. The predefined equivalence range was –4% to 4%. Secondary outcomes were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: The proportion of complete abortion was 94.8% (768/810): 390 (95.4%) in the midwife group and 378 (94.3%) in the physician group. The proportion of incomplete abortion was 5.2% (42/810), similarly distributed between midwives and physicians. The model-based risk difference for midwives versus physicians was 1.0% (–4.1 to 2.2). Most women felt safe (97%; 779/799), and 93% (748/801) perceived the treatment as expected/easier than expected. After contraceptive counselling the uptake of a contraceptive method after 7–10 days occurred in 76% (613/810). No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives is equally effective, safe and accepted by women as when administered by physicians in a low-resource setting. Systematically provided contraceptive counselling in PAC is effective to mitigate unmet need for contraception. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01865136; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5652492/ /pubmed/29018067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016157 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Global Health
Makenzius, Marlene
Oguttu, Monica
Klingberg-Allvin, Marie
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Odero, Theresa M A
Faxelid, Elisabeth
Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya
title Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya
title_full Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya
title_fullStr Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya
title_short Post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya
title_sort post-abortion care with misoprostol – equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in kenya
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016157
work_keys_str_mv AT makenziusmarlene postabortioncarewithmisoprostolequallyeffectivesafeandacceptedwhenadministeredbymidwivescomparedtophysiciansarandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialinalowresourcesettinginkenya
AT oguttumonica postabortioncarewithmisoprostolequallyeffectivesafeandacceptedwhenadministeredbymidwivescomparedtophysiciansarandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialinalowresourcesettinginkenya
AT klingbergallvinmarie postabortioncarewithmisoprostolequallyeffectivesafeandacceptedwhenadministeredbymidwivescomparedtophysiciansarandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialinalowresourcesettinginkenya
AT gemzelldanielssonkristina postabortioncarewithmisoprostolequallyeffectivesafeandacceptedwhenadministeredbymidwivescomparedtophysiciansarandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialinalowresourcesettinginkenya
AT oderotheresama postabortioncarewithmisoprostolequallyeffectivesafeandacceptedwhenadministeredbymidwivescomparedtophysiciansarandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialinalowresourcesettinginkenya
AT faxelidelisabeth postabortioncarewithmisoprostolequallyeffectivesafeandacceptedwhenadministeredbymidwivescomparedtophysiciansarandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialinalowresourcesettinginkenya