Cargando…
Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine whether internal carotid endarterectomy is associated with visual field changes. METHODS: Between March 2007 and December 2010, a cohort study involved 29 patients with stenosis of the carotid artery. All patients underwent ophthalmoscopy and kinetic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017027 |
_version_ | 1783273069150732288 |
---|---|
author | Konstantiniuk, Peter Steinbrugger, Iris Koter, Stephan Muehlsteiner, Johanna Wedrich, Andreas Cohnert, Tina |
author_facet | Konstantiniuk, Peter Steinbrugger, Iris Koter, Stephan Muehlsteiner, Johanna Wedrich, Andreas Cohnert, Tina |
author_sort | Konstantiniuk, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine whether internal carotid endarterectomy is associated with visual field changes. METHODS: Between March 2007 and December 2010, a cohort study involved 29 patients with stenosis of the carotid artery. All patients underwent ophthalmoscopy and kinetic visual field examination (Goldmann perimetry) preoperatively and postoperatively. Furthermore, a detailed area calculation was performed. On both the operated and the contralateral side, the areas surrounded by the different isopters (isopter areas) were determined and preoperative and postoperative values compared. The three isopters were classified from the centre to the periphery (I, II and III). Isopter area values are given as ratio compared with total perimetric circle. p Values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: 1) The ophthalmologists assessment Eight of eleven patients with precarotid endarterectomy impairments experienced focal or concentric improvement. Six cases with preoperative concentric narrowing of the isopters returned to normal or improved substantially. Three out of 18 patients with normal preoperative visual field presented with deteriorations after surgery, two cases with ipsilateral and one with contralateral focal impairment. In 15 cases, there was no preoperative or postoperative abnormality. 2) Area calculation (preoperative area, postoperative area, P) Ipsilateral: isopter area I (0.015, 0.018, 0.131), isopter area II (0.107, 0.120, 0.087), isopter area III (0.392, 0.425, 0.015) Contralateral: isopter area I (0.017, 0.021, 0.222), isopter area II (0.119, 0.125, 0.333), isopter area III (0.416, 0.434, 0.171) CONCLUSIONS: We found a statistically significant extension of the ipsilateral peripheral isopter area (III). Further studies will focus on the question which subgroup is most likely to profit from internal carotid endarterectomy with respect to visual field changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5652495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56524952017-10-27 Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria Konstantiniuk, Peter Steinbrugger, Iris Koter, Stephan Muehlsteiner, Johanna Wedrich, Andreas Cohnert, Tina BMJ Open Surgery PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine whether internal carotid endarterectomy is associated with visual field changes. METHODS: Between March 2007 and December 2010, a cohort study involved 29 patients with stenosis of the carotid artery. All patients underwent ophthalmoscopy and kinetic visual field examination (Goldmann perimetry) preoperatively and postoperatively. Furthermore, a detailed area calculation was performed. On both the operated and the contralateral side, the areas surrounded by the different isopters (isopter areas) were determined and preoperative and postoperative values compared. The three isopters were classified from the centre to the periphery (I, II and III). Isopter area values are given as ratio compared with total perimetric circle. p Values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: 1) The ophthalmologists assessment Eight of eleven patients with precarotid endarterectomy impairments experienced focal or concentric improvement. Six cases with preoperative concentric narrowing of the isopters returned to normal or improved substantially. Three out of 18 patients with normal preoperative visual field presented with deteriorations after surgery, two cases with ipsilateral and one with contralateral focal impairment. In 15 cases, there was no preoperative or postoperative abnormality. 2) Area calculation (preoperative area, postoperative area, P) Ipsilateral: isopter area I (0.015, 0.018, 0.131), isopter area II (0.107, 0.120, 0.087), isopter area III (0.392, 0.425, 0.015) Contralateral: isopter area I (0.017, 0.021, 0.222), isopter area II (0.119, 0.125, 0.333), isopter area III (0.416, 0.434, 0.171) CONCLUSIONS: We found a statistically significant extension of the ipsilateral peripheral isopter area (III). Further studies will focus on the question which subgroup is most likely to profit from internal carotid endarterectomy with respect to visual field changes. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5652495/ /pubmed/29042384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017027 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Surgery Konstantiniuk, Peter Steinbrugger, Iris Koter, Stephan Muehlsteiner, Johanna Wedrich, Andreas Cohnert, Tina Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria |
title | Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria |
title_full | Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria |
title_fullStr | Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria |
title_short | Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria |
title_sort | impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in austria |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konstantiniukpeter impactofinternalcarotidendarterectomyonvisualfieldsanonrandomisedprospectivecohortstudyinaustria AT steinbruggeriris impactofinternalcarotidendarterectomyonvisualfieldsanonrandomisedprospectivecohortstudyinaustria AT koterstephan impactofinternalcarotidendarterectomyonvisualfieldsanonrandomisedprospectivecohortstudyinaustria AT muehlsteinerjohanna impactofinternalcarotidendarterectomyonvisualfieldsanonrandomisedprospectivecohortstudyinaustria AT wedrichandreas impactofinternalcarotidendarterectomyonvisualfieldsanonrandomisedprospectivecohortstudyinaustria AT cohnerttina impactofinternalcarotidendarterectomyonvisualfieldsanonrandomisedprospectivecohortstudyinaustria |