Cargando…

Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol

INTRODUCTION: The Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013 (the Act) introduced a ‘soft opt-out’ system of organ donation on 1 December 2015. Citizens are encouraged to make their organ donation decision known during their lifetime. In order to work, the Act and media campaign need to create a context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noyes, Jane, Morgan, Karen, Walton, Phillip, Roberts, Abigail, Mclaughlin, Leah, Stephens, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29025839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017287
_version_ 1783273074766905344
author Noyes, Jane
Morgan, Karen
Walton, Phillip
Roberts, Abigail
Mclaughlin, Leah
Stephens, Michael
author_facet Noyes, Jane
Morgan, Karen
Walton, Phillip
Roberts, Abigail
Mclaughlin, Leah
Stephens, Michael
author_sort Noyes, Jane
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013 (the Act) introduced a ‘soft opt-out’ system of organ donation on 1 December 2015. Citizens are encouraged to make their organ donation decision known during their lifetime. In order to work, the Act and media campaign need to create a context, whereby organ donation becomes the norm, and create a mechanism for people to behave as intended (formally register their decision; consider appointing a representative; convey their donation decision to their families and friends or do nothing—deemed consent). In addition, family members/appointed representatives need to be able to put their own views aside to support the decision of their loved one. The aim of this study is to evaluate initial implementation, outcomes and impact on families and appointed representatives who were approached about organ donation during the first 18 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Prospective mixed-method coproductive study undertaken with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), and multiple patient/public representatives. The study is designed to collect information on all cases who meet specified criteria (≥18 years, deceased person voluntarily resident in Wales and died in Wales or England) whose family were approached between 1 December 2015 and 31 June 2017). Data for analysis include: NHSBT routinely collected anonymised audit data on all cases; Specialist Nurse in Organ Donation (SNOD) completed anonymised form for all cases documenting their perception of the families’ understanding of the Act, media campaign and outcome of the donation approach; questionnaires and depth interviews with any family member or appointed representative (minimum 50 cases). Additional focus groups and interviews with SNODs. Anonymised donation outcomes and registration activity reports for Wales provide additional context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by NHSBT Research, Innovation and Technology Advisory Group on 23 October 2015; Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 (IRAS190066; Rec Reference 15/WA/0414) on 25 November 2015 and NHSBT R&D Committee (NHSBT ID: AP-15–02) on 24 November 2015. REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered on the Health and Care Research Wales Clinical Research Portfolio. Study ID number 34396, www.ukctg.nihr.ac.uk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56525272017-10-27 Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol Noyes, Jane Morgan, Karen Walton, Phillip Roberts, Abigail Mclaughlin, Leah Stephens, Michael BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: The Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013 (the Act) introduced a ‘soft opt-out’ system of organ donation on 1 December 2015. Citizens are encouraged to make their organ donation decision known during their lifetime. In order to work, the Act and media campaign need to create a context, whereby organ donation becomes the norm, and create a mechanism for people to behave as intended (formally register their decision; consider appointing a representative; convey their donation decision to their families and friends or do nothing—deemed consent). In addition, family members/appointed representatives need to be able to put their own views aside to support the decision of their loved one. The aim of this study is to evaluate initial implementation, outcomes and impact on families and appointed representatives who were approached about organ donation during the first 18 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Prospective mixed-method coproductive study undertaken with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), and multiple patient/public representatives. The study is designed to collect information on all cases who meet specified criteria (≥18 years, deceased person voluntarily resident in Wales and died in Wales or England) whose family were approached between 1 December 2015 and 31 June 2017). Data for analysis include: NHSBT routinely collected anonymised audit data on all cases; Specialist Nurse in Organ Donation (SNOD) completed anonymised form for all cases documenting their perception of the families’ understanding of the Act, media campaign and outcome of the donation approach; questionnaires and depth interviews with any family member or appointed representative (minimum 50 cases). Additional focus groups and interviews with SNODs. Anonymised donation outcomes and registration activity reports for Wales provide additional context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by NHSBT Research, Innovation and Technology Advisory Group on 23 October 2015; Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 (IRAS190066; Rec Reference 15/WA/0414) on 25 November 2015 and NHSBT R&D Committee (NHSBT ID: AP-15–02) on 24 November 2015. REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered on the Health and Care Research Wales Clinical Research Portfolio. Study ID number 34396, www.ukctg.nihr.ac.uk BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5652527/ /pubmed/29025839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017287 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Noyes, Jane
Morgan, Karen
Walton, Phillip
Roberts, Abigail
Mclaughlin, Leah
Stephens, Michael
Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
title Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
title_full Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
title_fullStr Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
title_short Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
title_sort family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the human transplantation (wales) act 2013: mixed-method study protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29025839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017287
work_keys_str_mv AT noyesjane familyattitudesactionsdecisionsandexperiencesfollowingimplementationofdeemedconsentandthehumantransplantationwalesact2013mixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT morgankaren familyattitudesactionsdecisionsandexperiencesfollowingimplementationofdeemedconsentandthehumantransplantationwalesact2013mixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT waltonphillip familyattitudesactionsdecisionsandexperiencesfollowingimplementationofdeemedconsentandthehumantransplantationwalesact2013mixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT robertsabigail familyattitudesactionsdecisionsandexperiencesfollowingimplementationofdeemedconsentandthehumantransplantationwalesact2013mixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT mclaughlinleah familyattitudesactionsdecisionsandexperiencesfollowingimplementationofdeemedconsentandthehumantransplantationwalesact2013mixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT stephensmichael familyattitudesactionsdecisionsandexperiencesfollowingimplementationofdeemedconsentandthehumantransplantationwalesact2013mixedmethodstudyprotocol