Cargando…
Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor has been consistently shown to reduce recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary art...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2017-000651 |
_version_ | 1783273090594111488 |
---|---|
author | Degrauwe, Sophie Pilgrim, Thomas Aminian, Adel Noble, Stephane Meier, Pascal Iglesias, Juan F |
author_facet | Degrauwe, Sophie Pilgrim, Thomas Aminian, Adel Noble, Stephane Meier, Pascal Iglesias, Juan F |
author_sort | Degrauwe, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor has been consistently shown to reduce recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin monotherapy, but at the expense of an increased risk of major bleeding. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of DAPT for secondary prevention of CAD remains uncertain, owing to the conflicting results of several large randomised trials. Among patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES), shorter durations of DAPT (3–6 months) were shown non-inferior to 12 or 24 months duration with respect to MACE, but reduced the rates of major bleeding. Contrariwise, prolonged DAPT durations (18–48 months) reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, but at a cost of an increased risk of major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Until more evidence becomes available, the choice of optimal DAPT regimen and duration for patients with CAD requires a tailored approach based on the patient clinical presentation, baseline risk profile and management strategy. Future studies are however needed to identify patients who may derive benefit from shortened or extended DAPT courses for secondary prevention of CAD based on their individual ischaemic and bleeding risk. Based on limited evidence, 12 months duration of DAPT is currently recommended in patients with ACS irrespective of their management strategy, but large ongoing randomised trials are currently assessing the efficacy and safety of a short-term DAPT strategy (3–6 months) for patients with ACS undergoing PCI with newer generation DES. Finally, several ongoing, large-scale, randomised trials are challenging the current concept of DAPT by investigating P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors as single antiplatelet therapy and may potentially shift the paradigm of antiplatelet therapy after PCI in the near future. This article provides a contemporary state-of-the-art review of the current evidence on DAPT for secondary prevention of patients with CAD and its future perspectives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5652612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56526122017-10-27 Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease Degrauwe, Sophie Pilgrim, Thomas Aminian, Adel Noble, Stephane Meier, Pascal Iglesias, Juan F Open Heart Interventional Cardiology Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor has been consistently shown to reduce recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin monotherapy, but at the expense of an increased risk of major bleeding. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of DAPT for secondary prevention of CAD remains uncertain, owing to the conflicting results of several large randomised trials. Among patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES), shorter durations of DAPT (3–6 months) were shown non-inferior to 12 or 24 months duration with respect to MACE, but reduced the rates of major bleeding. Contrariwise, prolonged DAPT durations (18–48 months) reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, but at a cost of an increased risk of major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Until more evidence becomes available, the choice of optimal DAPT regimen and duration for patients with CAD requires a tailored approach based on the patient clinical presentation, baseline risk profile and management strategy. Future studies are however needed to identify patients who may derive benefit from shortened or extended DAPT courses for secondary prevention of CAD based on their individual ischaemic and bleeding risk. Based on limited evidence, 12 months duration of DAPT is currently recommended in patients with ACS irrespective of their management strategy, but large ongoing randomised trials are currently assessing the efficacy and safety of a short-term DAPT strategy (3–6 months) for patients with ACS undergoing PCI with newer generation DES. Finally, several ongoing, large-scale, randomised trials are challenging the current concept of DAPT by investigating P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors as single antiplatelet therapy and may potentially shift the paradigm of antiplatelet therapy after PCI in the near future. This article provides a contemporary state-of-the-art review of the current evidence on DAPT for secondary prevention of patients with CAD and its future perspectives. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5652612/ /pubmed/29081979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2017-000651 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Interventional Cardiology Degrauwe, Sophie Pilgrim, Thomas Aminian, Adel Noble, Stephane Meier, Pascal Iglesias, Juan F Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
title | Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
title_full | Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
title_fullStr | Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
title_short | Dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
title_sort | dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease |
topic | Interventional Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2017-000651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degrauwesophie dualantiplatelettherapyforsecondarypreventionofcoronaryarterydisease AT pilgrimthomas dualantiplatelettherapyforsecondarypreventionofcoronaryarterydisease AT aminianadel dualantiplatelettherapyforsecondarypreventionofcoronaryarterydisease AT noblestephane dualantiplatelettherapyforsecondarypreventionofcoronaryarterydisease AT meierpascal dualantiplatelettherapyforsecondarypreventionofcoronaryarterydisease AT iglesiasjuanf dualantiplatelettherapyforsecondarypreventionofcoronaryarterydisease |