Cargando…

Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Neurological dysfunction remains a devastating postoperative complication in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and previous studies have shown that inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) may produce different degrees of cerebra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Feng, Duan, Guangyou, Wu, Zhuoxi, Zuo, Zhiyi, Li, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29025825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014629
_version_ 1783273091845062656
author Chen, Feng
Duan, Guangyou
Wu, Zhuoxi
Zuo, Zhiyi
Li, Hong
author_facet Chen, Feng
Duan, Guangyou
Wu, Zhuoxi
Zuo, Zhiyi
Li, Hong
author_sort Chen, Feng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Neurological dysfunction remains a devastating postoperative complication in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and previous studies have shown that inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) may produce different degrees of cerebral protection in these patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to compare the neuroprotective effects of inhalation anaesthesia and TIVA. DESIGN: Searching in PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct/Elsevier, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Cochrane Library up to August 2016, we selected related randomised controlled trials for this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1485 studies were identified. After eliminating duplicate articles and screening titles and abstracts, 445 studies were potentially eligible. After applying exclusion criteria (full texts reported as abstracts, review article, no control case, lack of outcome data and so on), 13 studies were selected for review. Our results demonstrated that the primary outcome related to S100B level in the inhalation anaesthesia group was significantly lower than in the TIVA group after CPB and 24 hours postoperatively (weighted mean difference (WMD); 95% CI (CI): −0.41(–0.81 to –0.01), −0.32 (−0.59 to −0.05), respectively). Among secondary outcome variables, mini-mental state examination scores of the inhalation anaesthesia group were significantly higher than those of the TIVA group 24 hours after operation (WMD (95% CI): 1.87 (0.82 to 2.92)), but no significant difference was found in arteriovenous oxygen content difference, cerebral oxygen extraction ratio and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation, which were assessed at cooling and rewarming during CPB. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that anaesthesia with volatile agents appears to provide better cerebral protection than TIVA for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, suggesting that inhalation anaesthesia may be more suitable for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56526182017-10-27 Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Feng Duan, Guangyou Wu, Zhuoxi Zuo, Zhiyi Li, Hong BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: Neurological dysfunction remains a devastating postoperative complication in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and previous studies have shown that inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) may produce different degrees of cerebral protection in these patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to compare the neuroprotective effects of inhalation anaesthesia and TIVA. DESIGN: Searching in PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct/Elsevier, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Cochrane Library up to August 2016, we selected related randomised controlled trials for this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1485 studies were identified. After eliminating duplicate articles and screening titles and abstracts, 445 studies were potentially eligible. After applying exclusion criteria (full texts reported as abstracts, review article, no control case, lack of outcome data and so on), 13 studies were selected for review. Our results demonstrated that the primary outcome related to S100B level in the inhalation anaesthesia group was significantly lower than in the TIVA group after CPB and 24 hours postoperatively (weighted mean difference (WMD); 95% CI (CI): −0.41(–0.81 to –0.01), −0.32 (−0.59 to −0.05), respectively). Among secondary outcome variables, mini-mental state examination scores of the inhalation anaesthesia group were significantly higher than those of the TIVA group 24 hours after operation (WMD (95% CI): 1.87 (0.82 to 2.92)), but no significant difference was found in arteriovenous oxygen content difference, cerebral oxygen extraction ratio and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation, which were assessed at cooling and rewarming during CPB. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that anaesthesia with volatile agents appears to provide better cerebral protection than TIVA for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, suggesting that inhalation anaesthesia may be more suitable for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5652618/ /pubmed/29025825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014629 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Chen, Feng
Duan, Guangyou
Wu, Zhuoxi
Zuo, Zhiyi
Li, Hong
Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the cerebroprotective effect of inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29025825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014629
work_keys_str_mv AT chenfeng comparisonofthecerebroprotectiveeffectofinhalationanaesthesiaandtotalintravenousanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duanguangyou comparisonofthecerebroprotectiveeffectofinhalationanaesthesiaandtotalintravenousanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuzhuoxi comparisonofthecerebroprotectiveeffectofinhalationanaesthesiaandtotalintravenousanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zuozhiyi comparisonofthecerebroprotectiveeffectofinhalationanaesthesiaandtotalintravenousanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihong comparisonofthecerebroprotectiveeffectofinhalationanaesthesiaandtotalintravenousanaesthesiainpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis