Cargando…

Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience

To report a single-institution experience of gamma evaluations with 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, from January 2014 to January 2016. A total of 168 SABR VMAT plans were analyzed with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jung-in, Chun, Minsoo, Wu, Hong-Gyun, Chie, Eui Kyu, Kim, Hak Jae, Kim, Jin Ho, Park, Jong Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100293
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18530
_version_ 1783273104125984768
author Kim, Jung-in
Chun, Minsoo
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Chie, Eui Kyu
Kim, Hak Jae
Kim, Jin Ho
Park, Jong Min
author_facet Kim, Jung-in
Chun, Minsoo
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Chie, Eui Kyu
Kim, Hak Jae
Kim, Jin Ho
Park, Jong Min
author_sort Kim, Jung-in
collection PubMed
description To report a single-institution experience of gamma evaluations with 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, from January 2014 to January 2016. A total of 168 SABR VMAT plans were analyzed with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm, a threshold value of 10%, and a tolerance level of 90%. Of the 168 cases, four cases failed with 2%/1 mm. The average passing rate was 97.0% ± 2.5%. Three of the four failed cases showed passing rates higher than 90%, which was achieved by shifting the measuring device by 1 mm in the left-to-right or anterior-to-posterior directions. One failed case showed a passing rate higher than 90%, which was achieved by changing the threshold value from 10% to 5%, leading to an increase in the number of tested points from 26 to 51. Concerns regarding the high susceptibility of the gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm to setup errors of the measuring device are unnecessary based on our two-year experience, since only four cases failed with the 2%/1 mm from a total of 168 clinical cases. Therefore, the gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm could be successfully applied in the clinic with its high sensitivity to detect errors in VMAT plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56526872017-11-02 Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience Kim, Jung-in Chun, Minsoo Wu, Hong-Gyun Chie, Eui Kyu Kim, Hak Jae Kim, Jin Ho Park, Jong Min Oncotarget Research Paper To report a single-institution experience of gamma evaluations with 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, from January 2014 to January 2016. A total of 168 SABR VMAT plans were analyzed with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm, a threshold value of 10%, and a tolerance level of 90%. Of the 168 cases, four cases failed with 2%/1 mm. The average passing rate was 97.0% ± 2.5%. Three of the four failed cases showed passing rates higher than 90%, which was achieved by shifting the measuring device by 1 mm in the left-to-right or anterior-to-posterior directions. One failed case showed a passing rate higher than 90%, which was achieved by changing the threshold value from 10% to 5%, leading to an increase in the number of tested points from 26 to 51. Concerns regarding the high susceptibility of the gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm to setup errors of the measuring device are unnecessary based on our two-year experience, since only four cases failed with the 2%/1 mm from a total of 168 clinical cases. Therefore, the gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm could be successfully applied in the clinic with its high sensitivity to detect errors in VMAT plans. Impact Journals LLC 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5652687/ /pubmed/29100293 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18530 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kim, Jung-in
Chun, Minsoo
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Chie, Eui Kyu
Kim, Hak Jae
Kim, Jin Ho
Park, Jong Min
Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
title Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
title_full Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
title_fullStr Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
title_full_unstemmed Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
title_short Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
title_sort gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100293
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18530
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjungin gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience
AT chunminsoo gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience
AT wuhonggyun gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience
AT chieeuikyu gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience
AT kimhakjae gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience
AT kimjinho gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience
AT parkjongmin gammaanalysiswithagammacriterionof21mmforstereotacticablativeradiotherapydeliveredwithvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytechniqueasingleinstitutionexperience