Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Increasing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is effective for severe emphysema. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yong, Lai, Tian-Wen, Xu, Feng, Zhou, Jie-Sen, Li, Zhou-Yang, Xu, Xu-Chen, Chen, Hai-Pin, Ying, Song-Min, Li, Wen, Shen, Hua-Hao, Chen, Zhi-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100445
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19352
_version_ 1783273139702071296
author Wang, Yong
Lai, Tian-Wen
Xu, Feng
Zhou, Jie-Sen
Li, Zhou-Yang
Xu, Xu-Chen
Chen, Hai-Pin
Ying, Song-Min
Li, Wen
Shen, Hua-Hao
Chen, Zhi-Hua
author_facet Wang, Yong
Lai, Tian-Wen
Xu, Feng
Zhou, Jie-Sen
Li, Zhou-Yang
Xu, Xu-Chen
Chen, Hai-Pin
Ying, Song-Min
Li, Wen
Shen, Hua-Hao
Chen, Zhi-Hua
author_sort Wang, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is effective for severe emphysema. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and reference lists of related articles were searched, and RCTs that evaluated BLVR therapy VS conventional therapy were included. Meta-analysis was performed only when included RCTs ≥ 2 trials. RESULTS: In total, 3 RCTs for endobronchial coils, 6 RCTs for endobronchial valves (EBV) and 2 RCTs for intrabronchial valves (IBV) were included. Compared with conventional therapy, endobronchial coils showed better response in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) (RR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.61 – 3.48, p < 0.0001), for 6-min walk test (6MWT) (RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.18 – 3.53, p = 0.01), and for St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (RR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.77 – 3.03, p < 0.00001). EBV therapy also reached clinically significant improvement in FEV1 (RR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.49 – 5.87, p = 0.002), in 6MWT (RR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.24 – 6.79, p = 0.01), and in SGRQ (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 – 1.92, p = 0.0002). Both coils and EBV treatment achieved statistically significant absolute change in FEV1, 6MWT, and SGRQ from baseline, also accompanied by serious adverse effects. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed there was no difference between homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema in coils group. However, IBV group failed to show superior to conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Current meta-analysis indicates that coils or EBV treatment could significantly improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life compared with conventional therapy. Coils treatment could be applied in homogeneous emphysema, but further trials are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56528342017-11-02 Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Wang, Yong Lai, Tian-Wen Xu, Feng Zhou, Jie-Sen Li, Zhou-Yang Xu, Xu-Chen Chen, Hai-Pin Ying, Song-Min Li, Wen Shen, Hua-Hao Chen, Zhi-Hua Oncotarget Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Increasing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is effective for severe emphysema. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and reference lists of related articles were searched, and RCTs that evaluated BLVR therapy VS conventional therapy were included. Meta-analysis was performed only when included RCTs ≥ 2 trials. RESULTS: In total, 3 RCTs for endobronchial coils, 6 RCTs for endobronchial valves (EBV) and 2 RCTs for intrabronchial valves (IBV) were included. Compared with conventional therapy, endobronchial coils showed better response in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) (RR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.61 – 3.48, p < 0.0001), for 6-min walk test (6MWT) (RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.18 – 3.53, p = 0.01), and for St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (RR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.77 – 3.03, p < 0.00001). EBV therapy also reached clinically significant improvement in FEV1 (RR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.49 – 5.87, p = 0.002), in 6MWT (RR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.24 – 6.79, p = 0.01), and in SGRQ (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 – 1.92, p = 0.0002). Both coils and EBV treatment achieved statistically significant absolute change in FEV1, 6MWT, and SGRQ from baseline, also accompanied by serious adverse effects. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed there was no difference between homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema in coils group. However, IBV group failed to show superior to conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Current meta-analysis indicates that coils or EBV treatment could significantly improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life compared with conventional therapy. Coils treatment could be applied in homogeneous emphysema, but further trials are needed. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5652834/ /pubmed/29100445 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19352 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Wang, Yong
Lai, Tian-Wen
Xu, Feng
Zhou, Jie-Sen
Li, Zhou-Yang
Xu, Xu-Chen
Chen, Hai-Pin
Ying, Song-Min
Li, Wen
Shen, Hua-Hao
Chen, Zhi-Hua
Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100445
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19352
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyong efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laitianwen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xufeng efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhoujiesen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lizhouyang efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuxuchen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenhaipin efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yingsongmin efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liwen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shenhuahao efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenzhihua efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials