Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Increasing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is effective for severe emphysema. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100445 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19352 |
_version_ | 1783273139702071296 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yong Lai, Tian-Wen Xu, Feng Zhou, Jie-Sen Li, Zhou-Yang Xu, Xu-Chen Chen, Hai-Pin Ying, Song-Min Li, Wen Shen, Hua-Hao Chen, Zhi-Hua |
author_facet | Wang, Yong Lai, Tian-Wen Xu, Feng Zhou, Jie-Sen Li, Zhou-Yang Xu, Xu-Chen Chen, Hai-Pin Ying, Song-Min Li, Wen Shen, Hua-Hao Chen, Zhi-Hua |
author_sort | Wang, Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is effective for severe emphysema. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and reference lists of related articles were searched, and RCTs that evaluated BLVR therapy VS conventional therapy were included. Meta-analysis was performed only when included RCTs ≥ 2 trials. RESULTS: In total, 3 RCTs for endobronchial coils, 6 RCTs for endobronchial valves (EBV) and 2 RCTs for intrabronchial valves (IBV) were included. Compared with conventional therapy, endobronchial coils showed better response in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) (RR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.61 – 3.48, p < 0.0001), for 6-min walk test (6MWT) (RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.18 – 3.53, p = 0.01), and for St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (RR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.77 – 3.03, p < 0.00001). EBV therapy also reached clinically significant improvement in FEV1 (RR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.49 – 5.87, p = 0.002), in 6MWT (RR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.24 – 6.79, p = 0.01), and in SGRQ (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 – 1.92, p = 0.0002). Both coils and EBV treatment achieved statistically significant absolute change in FEV1, 6MWT, and SGRQ from baseline, also accompanied by serious adverse effects. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed there was no difference between homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema in coils group. However, IBV group failed to show superior to conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Current meta-analysis indicates that coils or EBV treatment could significantly improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life compared with conventional therapy. Coils treatment could be applied in homogeneous emphysema, but further trials are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5652834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56528342017-11-02 Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Wang, Yong Lai, Tian-Wen Xu, Feng Zhou, Jie-Sen Li, Zhou-Yang Xu, Xu-Chen Chen, Hai-Pin Ying, Song-Min Li, Wen Shen, Hua-Hao Chen, Zhi-Hua Oncotarget Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Increasing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is effective for severe emphysema. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and reference lists of related articles were searched, and RCTs that evaluated BLVR therapy VS conventional therapy were included. Meta-analysis was performed only when included RCTs ≥ 2 trials. RESULTS: In total, 3 RCTs for endobronchial coils, 6 RCTs for endobronchial valves (EBV) and 2 RCTs for intrabronchial valves (IBV) were included. Compared with conventional therapy, endobronchial coils showed better response in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) (RR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.61 – 3.48, p < 0.0001), for 6-min walk test (6MWT) (RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.18 – 3.53, p = 0.01), and for St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (RR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.77 – 3.03, p < 0.00001). EBV therapy also reached clinically significant improvement in FEV1 (RR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.49 – 5.87, p = 0.002), in 6MWT (RR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.24 – 6.79, p = 0.01), and in SGRQ (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.22 – 1.92, p = 0.0002). Both coils and EBV treatment achieved statistically significant absolute change in FEV1, 6MWT, and SGRQ from baseline, also accompanied by serious adverse effects. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed there was no difference between homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema in coils group. However, IBV group failed to show superior to conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Current meta-analysis indicates that coils or EBV treatment could significantly improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life compared with conventional therapy. Coils treatment could be applied in homogeneous emphysema, but further trials are needed. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5652834/ /pubmed/29100445 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19352 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Wang, Yong Lai, Tian-Wen Xu, Feng Zhou, Jie-Sen Li, Zhou-Yang Xu, Xu-Chen Chen, Hai-Pin Ying, Song-Min Li, Wen Shen, Hua-Hao Chen, Zhi-Hua Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100445 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyong efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT laitianwen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xufeng efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhoujiesen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lizhouyang efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xuxuchen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenhaipin efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yingsongmin efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liwen efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shenhuahao efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenzhihua efficacyandsafetyofbronchoscopiclungvolumereductiontherapyinpatientswithsevereemphysemaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |