Cargando…

Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Apply peripheral blood as a surrogate for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in tumor, also called liquid biopsy, has been reported to be a feasible method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. But the diagnostic yield varies in different studies. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Xiaowei, Zhang, Yujun, Xie, Fangfang, Zheng, Xiaoxuan, Sun, Jiayuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100447
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20291
_version_ 1783273140164493312
author Mao, Xiaowei
Zhang, Yujun
Xie, Fangfang
Zheng, Xiaoxuan
Sun, Jiayuan
author_facet Mao, Xiaowei
Zhang, Yujun
Xie, Fangfang
Zheng, Xiaoxuan
Sun, Jiayuan
author_sort Mao, Xiaowei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Apply peripheral blood as a surrogate for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in tumor, also called liquid biopsy, has been reported to be a feasible method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. But the diagnostic yield varies in different studies. METHODS: A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of peripheral blood in detection epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small lung cancer patients. Publications up to October 2016 were searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. Sensitivity, specificity and other parameters were pooled using the bivariate mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS: Fifteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59~0.78), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94~0.99), 23.1 (95% CI: 11.6~46.1), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23~0.44), 73 (95% CI: 33~159), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). DISCUSSION: Detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in peripheral blood is a reliable and non-invasive method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. More sensitive detection methods are required to increase the sensitivity of liquid biopsy of ctDNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56528362017-11-02 Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis Mao, Xiaowei Zhang, Yujun Xie, Fangfang Zheng, Xiaoxuan Sun, Jiayuan Oncotarget Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Apply peripheral blood as a surrogate for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in tumor, also called liquid biopsy, has been reported to be a feasible method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. But the diagnostic yield varies in different studies. METHODS: A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of peripheral blood in detection epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small lung cancer patients. Publications up to October 2016 were searched using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. Sensitivity, specificity and other parameters were pooled using the bivariate mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS: Fifteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59~0.78), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94~0.99), 23.1 (95% CI: 11.6~46.1), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23~0.44), 73 (95% CI: 33~159), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). DISCUSSION: Detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in peripheral blood is a reliable and non-invasive method in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. More sensitive detection methods are required to increase the sensitivity of liquid biopsy of ctDNA. Impact Journals LLC 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5652836/ /pubmed/29100447 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20291 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Mao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Mao, Xiaowei
Zhang, Yujun
Xie, Fangfang
Zheng, Xiaoxuan
Sun, Jiayuan
Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_full Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_short Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis
title_sort can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100447
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20291
work_keys_str_mv AT maoxiaowei canperipheralbloodbeusedassurrogateindetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationstatusinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT zhangyujun canperipheralbloodbeusedassurrogateindetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationstatusinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT xiefangfang canperipheralbloodbeusedassurrogateindetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationstatusinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT zhengxiaoxuan canperipheralbloodbeusedassurrogateindetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationstatusinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsametaanalysis
AT sunjiayuan canperipheralbloodbeusedassurrogateindetectingepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationstatusinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsametaanalysis