Cargando…

Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate the power use and complication frequency of resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 196 eyes from 103 patients who underwent neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser iridotomy performed by resident physicians from January 1, 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kam, Jason P, Zepeda, Emily M, Ding, Leona, Wen, Joanne C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081648
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S148467
_version_ 1783273151879184384
author Kam, Jason P
Zepeda, Emily M
Ding, Leona
Wen, Joanne C
author_facet Kam, Jason P
Zepeda, Emily M
Ding, Leona
Wen, Joanne C
author_sort Kam, Jason P
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the power use and complication frequency of resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 196 eyes from 103 patients who underwent neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser iridotomy performed by resident physicians from January 1, 2010 through April 30, 2015 at a university-based county hospital was done. All patients were treated for primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma. Data were collected on pre- and post-laser intraocular pressure (IOP), ethnicity, laser parameters and complications. Mean power use and frequency of complications were evaluated. Complications included elevated post-laser IOP at 30–45 minutes (≥8 mmHg), hyphema, aborted procedures, and lasering non-iris structures. The number of repeated LPI procedures, was also recorded. RESULTS: Mean total power used for all residents was 78.2±68.7 mJ per eye. Power use by first-year trainees was significantly higher than second- and third-year trainees (103.5±75.5 mJ versus 73.7±73.8 mJ and 67.2±56.4 mJ, respectively, p=0.011). Complications included hyphema or microhyphema in 17.9% (35/196), IOP spikes in 5.1% (10/196), aborted procedures in 1.1% (3/196) and lasering non-iris structures in 0.5% (1/196). LPI was repeated in 22.4% of cases (44/196) with higher incidence of repeat LPI among non-Caucasian compared to the Caucasian subjects (p=0.02). Complication rates did not differ with increased training (p=0.16). CONCLUSION: Total power used for LPI decreased with increased resident training, while the complication rate did not differ significantly among resident classes. Complication rates were comparable to rates reported in the literature for attending-performed LPIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56529202017-10-27 Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma Kam, Jason P Zepeda, Emily M Ding, Leona Wen, Joanne C Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate the power use and complication frequency of resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 196 eyes from 103 patients who underwent neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser iridotomy performed by resident physicians from January 1, 2010 through April 30, 2015 at a university-based county hospital was done. All patients were treated for primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma. Data were collected on pre- and post-laser intraocular pressure (IOP), ethnicity, laser parameters and complications. Mean power use and frequency of complications were evaluated. Complications included elevated post-laser IOP at 30–45 minutes (≥8 mmHg), hyphema, aborted procedures, and lasering non-iris structures. The number of repeated LPI procedures, was also recorded. RESULTS: Mean total power used for all residents was 78.2±68.7 mJ per eye. Power use by first-year trainees was significantly higher than second- and third-year trainees (103.5±75.5 mJ versus 73.7±73.8 mJ and 67.2±56.4 mJ, respectively, p=0.011). Complications included hyphema or microhyphema in 17.9% (35/196), IOP spikes in 5.1% (10/196), aborted procedures in 1.1% (3/196) and lasering non-iris structures in 0.5% (1/196). LPI was repeated in 22.4% of cases (44/196) with higher incidence of repeat LPI among non-Caucasian compared to the Caucasian subjects (p=0.02). Complication rates did not differ with increased training (p=0.16). CONCLUSION: Total power used for LPI decreased with increased resident training, while the complication rate did not differ significantly among resident classes. Complication rates were comparable to rates reported in the literature for attending-performed LPIs. Dove Medical Press 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5652920/ /pubmed/29081648 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S148467 Text en © 2017 Kam et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kam, Jason P
Zepeda, Emily M
Ding, Leona
Wen, Joanne C
Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
title Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
title_full Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
title_fullStr Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
title_short Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
title_sort resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081648
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S148467
work_keys_str_mv AT kamjasonp residentperformedlaserperipheraliridotomyinprimaryangleclosureprimaryangleclosuresuspectsandprimaryangleclosureglaucoma
AT zepedaemilym residentperformedlaserperipheraliridotomyinprimaryangleclosureprimaryangleclosuresuspectsandprimaryangleclosureglaucoma
AT dingleona residentperformedlaserperipheraliridotomyinprimaryangleclosureprimaryangleclosuresuspectsandprimaryangleclosureglaucoma
AT wenjoannec residentperformedlaserperipheraliridotomyinprimaryangleclosureprimaryangleclosuresuspectsandprimaryangleclosureglaucoma