Cargando…

The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future

OBJECTIVE: Urology practice has undergone several changes in recent years mainly related to novel technologies introduced. We aimed to get the residents’ perspective on the current residency program in Israel and propose changes in it. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among urology reside...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavi, Arnon, Tzemah, Sharon, Hussein, Anan, Bishara, Ibrahim, Shcherbakov, Nikolay, Zelichenko, Genady, Mashiah, Alon, Gross, Michael, Cohen, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rambam Health Care Campus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059043
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10317
_version_ 1783273154246868992
author Lavi, Arnon
Tzemah, Sharon
Hussein, Anan
Bishara, Ibrahim
Shcherbakov, Nikolay
Zelichenko, Genady
Mashiah, Alon
Gross, Michael
Cohen, Michael
author_facet Lavi, Arnon
Tzemah, Sharon
Hussein, Anan
Bishara, Ibrahim
Shcherbakov, Nikolay
Zelichenko, Genady
Mashiah, Alon
Gross, Michael
Cohen, Michael
author_sort Lavi, Arnon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Urology practice has undergone several changes in recent years mainly related to novel technologies introduced. We aimed to get the residents’ perspective on the current residency program in Israel and propose changes in it. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among urology residents. RESULTS: 61 residents completed the survey out of 95 to whom it was sent (64% compliance). A total of 30% replied that the 9 months of mandatory general surgery rotation contributed to their training, 48% replied it should be shortened/canceled, and 43% replied that the Step A exam (a mandatory written certifying exam) in general surgery was relevant to their training. A total of 37% thought that surgical exposure during the residency was adequate, and 28% considered their training “hands-on.” Most non-junior residents (post-graduate year 3 and beyond) reported being able to perform simple procedures such as circumcision and transurethral resections but not complex procedures such as radical and laparoscopic procedures. A total of 41% of non-junior residents practice at a urology clinic. A total of 62% of residents from centers with no robotics replied its absence harmed their training, and 85% replied they would benefit from a robotics rotation. A total of 61% of residents from centers with robotics replied its presence harmed their training, and 72% replied they would benefit from an open surgery rotation. A total of 82% of the residents participated in post-graduate courses, and 81% replied they would engage in a clinical fellowship. CONCLUSION: Given the survey results we propose some changes to be considered in the residency program. These include changes in the general surgery rotation and exam, better surgical training, possible exchange rotations to expose residents to robotic and open surgery (depending on the availability of robotics in their center), greater out-patient urology clinic exposure, and possible changes in the basic science period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5652930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56529302017-10-27 The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future Lavi, Arnon Tzemah, Sharon Hussein, Anan Bishara, Ibrahim Shcherbakov, Nikolay Zelichenko, Genady Mashiah, Alon Gross, Michael Cohen, Michael Rambam Maimonides Med J Special Issue on Novel Technologies in Urologic Investigation and Treatment OBJECTIVE: Urology practice has undergone several changes in recent years mainly related to novel technologies introduced. We aimed to get the residents’ perspective on the current residency program in Israel and propose changes in it. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among urology residents. RESULTS: 61 residents completed the survey out of 95 to whom it was sent (64% compliance). A total of 30% replied that the 9 months of mandatory general surgery rotation contributed to their training, 48% replied it should be shortened/canceled, and 43% replied that the Step A exam (a mandatory written certifying exam) in general surgery was relevant to their training. A total of 37% thought that surgical exposure during the residency was adequate, and 28% considered their training “hands-on.” Most non-junior residents (post-graduate year 3 and beyond) reported being able to perform simple procedures such as circumcision and transurethral resections but not complex procedures such as radical and laparoscopic procedures. A total of 41% of non-junior residents practice at a urology clinic. A total of 62% of residents from centers with no robotics replied its absence harmed their training, and 85% replied they would benefit from a robotics rotation. A total of 61% of residents from centers with robotics replied its presence harmed their training, and 72% replied they would benefit from an open surgery rotation. A total of 82% of the residents participated in post-graduate courses, and 81% replied they would engage in a clinical fellowship. CONCLUSION: Given the survey results we propose some changes to be considered in the residency program. These include changes in the general surgery rotation and exam, better surgical training, possible exchange rotations to expose residents to robotic and open surgery (depending on the availability of robotics in their center), greater out-patient urology clinic exposure, and possible changes in the basic science period. Rambam Health Care Campus 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5652930/ /pubmed/29059043 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10317 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lavi et al. This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue on Novel Technologies in Urologic Investigation and Treatment
Lavi, Arnon
Tzemah, Sharon
Hussein, Anan
Bishara, Ibrahim
Shcherbakov, Nikolay
Zelichenko, Genady
Mashiah, Alon
Gross, Michael
Cohen, Michael
The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
title The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
title_full The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
title_fullStr The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
title_full_unstemmed The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
title_short The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
title_sort urology residency program in israel—results of a residents survey and insights for the future
topic Special Issue on Novel Technologies in Urologic Investigation and Treatment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059043
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10317
work_keys_str_mv AT laviarnon theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT tzemahsharon theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT husseinanan theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT bisharaibrahim theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT shcherbakovnikolay theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT zelichenkogenady theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT mashiahalon theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT grossmichael theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT cohenmichael theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT laviarnon urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT tzemahsharon urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT husseinanan urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT bisharaibrahim urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT shcherbakovnikolay urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT zelichenkogenady urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT mashiahalon urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT grossmichael urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture
AT cohenmichael urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture