Cargando…
The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future
OBJECTIVE: Urology practice has undergone several changes in recent years mainly related to novel technologies introduced. We aimed to get the residents’ perspective on the current residency program in Israel and propose changes in it. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among urology reside...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rambam Health Care Campus
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059043 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10317 |
_version_ | 1783273154246868992 |
---|---|
author | Lavi, Arnon Tzemah, Sharon Hussein, Anan Bishara, Ibrahim Shcherbakov, Nikolay Zelichenko, Genady Mashiah, Alon Gross, Michael Cohen, Michael |
author_facet | Lavi, Arnon Tzemah, Sharon Hussein, Anan Bishara, Ibrahim Shcherbakov, Nikolay Zelichenko, Genady Mashiah, Alon Gross, Michael Cohen, Michael |
author_sort | Lavi, Arnon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Urology practice has undergone several changes in recent years mainly related to novel technologies introduced. We aimed to get the residents’ perspective on the current residency program in Israel and propose changes in it. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among urology residents. RESULTS: 61 residents completed the survey out of 95 to whom it was sent (64% compliance). A total of 30% replied that the 9 months of mandatory general surgery rotation contributed to their training, 48% replied it should be shortened/canceled, and 43% replied that the Step A exam (a mandatory written certifying exam) in general surgery was relevant to their training. A total of 37% thought that surgical exposure during the residency was adequate, and 28% considered their training “hands-on.” Most non-junior residents (post-graduate year 3 and beyond) reported being able to perform simple procedures such as circumcision and transurethral resections but not complex procedures such as radical and laparoscopic procedures. A total of 41% of non-junior residents practice at a urology clinic. A total of 62% of residents from centers with no robotics replied its absence harmed their training, and 85% replied they would benefit from a robotics rotation. A total of 61% of residents from centers with robotics replied its presence harmed their training, and 72% replied they would benefit from an open surgery rotation. A total of 82% of the residents participated in post-graduate courses, and 81% replied they would engage in a clinical fellowship. CONCLUSION: Given the survey results we propose some changes to be considered in the residency program. These include changes in the general surgery rotation and exam, better surgical training, possible exchange rotations to expose residents to robotic and open surgery (depending on the availability of robotics in their center), greater out-patient urology clinic exposure, and possible changes in the basic science period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5652930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Rambam Health Care Campus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56529302017-10-27 The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future Lavi, Arnon Tzemah, Sharon Hussein, Anan Bishara, Ibrahim Shcherbakov, Nikolay Zelichenko, Genady Mashiah, Alon Gross, Michael Cohen, Michael Rambam Maimonides Med J Special Issue on Novel Technologies in Urologic Investigation and Treatment OBJECTIVE: Urology practice has undergone several changes in recent years mainly related to novel technologies introduced. We aimed to get the residents’ perspective on the current residency program in Israel and propose changes in it. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed among urology residents. RESULTS: 61 residents completed the survey out of 95 to whom it was sent (64% compliance). A total of 30% replied that the 9 months of mandatory general surgery rotation contributed to their training, 48% replied it should be shortened/canceled, and 43% replied that the Step A exam (a mandatory written certifying exam) in general surgery was relevant to their training. A total of 37% thought that surgical exposure during the residency was adequate, and 28% considered their training “hands-on.” Most non-junior residents (post-graduate year 3 and beyond) reported being able to perform simple procedures such as circumcision and transurethral resections but not complex procedures such as radical and laparoscopic procedures. A total of 41% of non-junior residents practice at a urology clinic. A total of 62% of residents from centers with no robotics replied its absence harmed their training, and 85% replied they would benefit from a robotics rotation. A total of 61% of residents from centers with robotics replied its presence harmed their training, and 72% replied they would benefit from an open surgery rotation. A total of 82% of the residents participated in post-graduate courses, and 81% replied they would engage in a clinical fellowship. CONCLUSION: Given the survey results we propose some changes to be considered in the residency program. These include changes in the general surgery rotation and exam, better surgical training, possible exchange rotations to expose residents to robotic and open surgery (depending on the availability of robotics in their center), greater out-patient urology clinic exposure, and possible changes in the basic science period. Rambam Health Care Campus 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5652930/ /pubmed/29059043 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10317 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lavi et al. This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue on Novel Technologies in Urologic Investigation and Treatment Lavi, Arnon Tzemah, Sharon Hussein, Anan Bishara, Ibrahim Shcherbakov, Nikolay Zelichenko, Genady Mashiah, Alon Gross, Michael Cohen, Michael The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future |
title | The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future |
title_full | The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future |
title_fullStr | The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future |
title_full_unstemmed | The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future |
title_short | The Urology Residency Program in Israel—Results of a Residents Survey and Insights for the Future |
title_sort | urology residency program in israel—results of a residents survey and insights for the future |
topic | Special Issue on Novel Technologies in Urologic Investigation and Treatment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059043 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laviarnon theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT tzemahsharon theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT husseinanan theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT bisharaibrahim theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT shcherbakovnikolay theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT zelichenkogenady theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT mashiahalon theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT grossmichael theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT cohenmichael theurologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT laviarnon urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT tzemahsharon urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT husseinanan urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT bisharaibrahim urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT shcherbakovnikolay urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT zelichenkogenady urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT mashiahalon urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT grossmichael urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture AT cohenmichael urologyresidencyprograminisraelresultsofaresidentssurveyandinsightsforthefuture |