Cargando…

Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making

Depressive pathology, which includes both heightened negative affect (e.g., anxiety) and reduced positive affect (e.g., anhedonia), is known to be associated with sub-optimal decision-making, particularly in uncertain environments. Here, we use a computational approach to quantify and disambiguate h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harlé, Katia M., Guo, Dalin, Zhang, Shunan, Paulus, Martin P., Yu, Angela J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186473
_version_ 1783273207440080896
author Harlé, Katia M.
Guo, Dalin
Zhang, Shunan
Paulus, Martin P.
Yu, Angela J.
author_facet Harlé, Katia M.
Guo, Dalin
Zhang, Shunan
Paulus, Martin P.
Yu, Angela J.
author_sort Harlé, Katia M.
collection PubMed
description Depressive pathology, which includes both heightened negative affect (e.g., anxiety) and reduced positive affect (e.g., anhedonia), is known to be associated with sub-optimal decision-making, particularly in uncertain environments. Here, we use a computational approach to quantify and disambiguate how individual differences in these affective measures specifically relate to different aspects of learning and decision-making in reward-based choice behavior. Fifty-three individuals with a range of depressed mood completed a two-armed bandit task, in which they choose between two arms with fixed but unknown reward rates. The decision-making component, which chooses among options based on current expectations about reward rates, is modeled by two different decision policies: a learning-independent Win-stay/Lose-shift (WSLS) policy that ignores all previous experiences except the last trial, and Softmax, which prefers the arm with the higher expected reward. To model the learning component for the Softmax choice policy, we use a Bayesian inference model, which updates estimated reward rates based on the observed history of trial outcomes. Softmax with Bayesian learning better fits the behavior of 55% of the participants, while the others are better fit by a learning-independent WSLS strategy. Among Softmax “users”, those with higher anhedonia are less likely to choose the option estimated to be most rewarding. Moreover, the Softmax parameter mediates the inverse relationship between anhedonia and overall monetary gains. On the other hand, among WSLS “users”, higher state anxiety correlates with increasingly better ability of WSLS, relative to Softmax, to explain subjects’ trial-by-trial choices. In summary, there is significant variability among individuals in their reward-based, exploratory decision-making, and this variability is at least partly mediated in a very specific manner by affective attributes, such as hedonic tone and state anxiety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5653291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56532912017-11-08 Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making Harlé, Katia M. Guo, Dalin Zhang, Shunan Paulus, Martin P. Yu, Angela J. PLoS One Research Article Depressive pathology, which includes both heightened negative affect (e.g., anxiety) and reduced positive affect (e.g., anhedonia), is known to be associated with sub-optimal decision-making, particularly in uncertain environments. Here, we use a computational approach to quantify and disambiguate how individual differences in these affective measures specifically relate to different aspects of learning and decision-making in reward-based choice behavior. Fifty-three individuals with a range of depressed mood completed a two-armed bandit task, in which they choose between two arms with fixed but unknown reward rates. The decision-making component, which chooses among options based on current expectations about reward rates, is modeled by two different decision policies: a learning-independent Win-stay/Lose-shift (WSLS) policy that ignores all previous experiences except the last trial, and Softmax, which prefers the arm with the higher expected reward. To model the learning component for the Softmax choice policy, we use a Bayesian inference model, which updates estimated reward rates based on the observed history of trial outcomes. Softmax with Bayesian learning better fits the behavior of 55% of the participants, while the others are better fit by a learning-independent WSLS strategy. Among Softmax “users”, those with higher anhedonia are less likely to choose the option estimated to be most rewarding. Moreover, the Softmax parameter mediates the inverse relationship between anhedonia and overall monetary gains. On the other hand, among WSLS “users”, higher state anxiety correlates with increasingly better ability of WSLS, relative to Softmax, to explain subjects’ trial-by-trial choices. In summary, there is significant variability among individuals in their reward-based, exploratory decision-making, and this variability is at least partly mediated in a very specific manner by affective attributes, such as hedonic tone and state anxiety. Public Library of Science 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5653291/ /pubmed/29059254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186473 Text en © 2017 Harlé et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harlé, Katia M.
Guo, Dalin
Zhang, Shunan
Paulus, Martin P.
Yu, Angela J.
Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
title Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
title_full Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
title_fullStr Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
title_short Anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
title_sort anhedonia and anxiety underlying depressive symptomatology have distinct effects on reward-based decision-making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186473
work_keys_str_mv AT harlekatiam anhedoniaandanxietyunderlyingdepressivesymptomatologyhavedistincteffectsonrewardbaseddecisionmaking
AT guodalin anhedoniaandanxietyunderlyingdepressivesymptomatologyhavedistincteffectsonrewardbaseddecisionmaking
AT zhangshunan anhedoniaandanxietyunderlyingdepressivesymptomatologyhavedistincteffectsonrewardbaseddecisionmaking
AT paulusmartinp anhedoniaandanxietyunderlyingdepressivesymptomatologyhavedistincteffectsonrewardbaseddecisionmaking
AT yuangelaj anhedoniaandanxietyunderlyingdepressivesymptomatologyhavedistincteffectsonrewardbaseddecisionmaking