Cargando…

Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. METHODS: The study sample consisted of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Chong Ook, Sa'aed, Noor Laith, Bayome, Mohamed, Park, Jae Hyun, Kook, Yoon-Ah, Park, Young-Seok, Han, Seong Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090125
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375
_version_ 1783273253436915712
author Park, Chong Ook
Sa'aed, Noor Laith
Bayome, Mohamed
Park, Jae Hyun
Kook, Yoon-Ah
Park, Young-Seok
Han, Seong Ho
author_facet Park, Chong Ook
Sa'aed, Noor Laith
Bayome, Mohamed
Park, Jae Hyun
Kook, Yoon-Ah
Park, Young-Seok
Han, Seong Ho
author_sort Park, Chong Ook
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. METHODS: The study sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 44 adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, including 22 who received treatment with MCPP (age, 24.7 ± 7.7 years) and 22 who received treatment with cervical pull headgear (age, 23.0 ± 7.7 years). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were analyzed for 24 linear and angular measurements. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the changes after treatment in each group and differences in treatment effects between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the maxillary first molar and the amount of distal tipping was 4.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.9° in the MCPP group, and 2.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 8.6° in the headgear group, respectively. In addition, intrusion by 2.5 mm was observed in the MCPP group. In both groups, the distal movement of the upper lip and the increase in the nasolabial angle were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, none of the skeletal and soft tissue variables exhibited significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MCPP is an effective treatment modality for total arch distalization in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5653686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56536862017-11-01 Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults Park, Chong Ook Sa'aed, Noor Laith Bayome, Mohamed Park, Jae Hyun Kook, Yoon-Ah Park, Young-Seok Han, Seong Ho Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. METHODS: The study sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 44 adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, including 22 who received treatment with MCPP (age, 24.7 ± 7.7 years) and 22 who received treatment with cervical pull headgear (age, 23.0 ± 7.7 years). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were analyzed for 24 linear and angular measurements. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the changes after treatment in each group and differences in treatment effects between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the maxillary first molar and the amount of distal tipping was 4.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.9° in the MCPP group, and 2.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 8.6° in the headgear group, respectively. In addition, intrusion by 2.5 mm was observed in the MCPP group. In both groups, the distal movement of the upper lip and the increase in the nasolabial angle were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, none of the skeletal and soft tissue variables exhibited significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MCPP is an effective treatment modality for total arch distalization in adults. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2017-11 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5653686/ /pubmed/29090125 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375 Text en © 2017 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Chong Ook
Sa'aed, Noor Laith
Bayome, Mohamed
Park, Jae Hyun
Kook, Yoon-Ah
Park, Young-Seok
Han, Seong Ho
Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
title Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
title_full Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
title_short Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
title_sort comparison of treatment effects between the modified c-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090125
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375
work_keys_str_mv AT parkchongook comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults
AT saaednoorlaith comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults
AT bayomemohamed comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults
AT parkjaehyun comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults
AT kookyoonah comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults
AT parkyoungseok comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults
AT hanseongho comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults