Cargando…
Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. METHODS: The study sample consisted of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Orthodontists
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090125 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375 |
_version_ | 1783273253436915712 |
---|---|
author | Park, Chong Ook Sa'aed, Noor Laith Bayome, Mohamed Park, Jae Hyun Kook, Yoon-Ah Park, Young-Seok Han, Seong Ho |
author_facet | Park, Chong Ook Sa'aed, Noor Laith Bayome, Mohamed Park, Jae Hyun Kook, Yoon-Ah Park, Young-Seok Han, Seong Ho |
author_sort | Park, Chong Ook |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. METHODS: The study sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 44 adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, including 22 who received treatment with MCPP (age, 24.7 ± 7.7 years) and 22 who received treatment with cervical pull headgear (age, 23.0 ± 7.7 years). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were analyzed for 24 linear and angular measurements. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the changes after treatment in each group and differences in treatment effects between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the maxillary first molar and the amount of distal tipping was 4.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.9° in the MCPP group, and 2.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 8.6° in the headgear group, respectively. In addition, intrusion by 2.5 mm was observed in the MCPP group. In both groups, the distal movement of the upper lip and the increase in the nasolabial angle were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, none of the skeletal and soft tissue variables exhibited significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MCPP is an effective treatment modality for total arch distalization in adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5653686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Association of Orthodontists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56536862017-11-01 Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults Park, Chong Ook Sa'aed, Noor Laith Bayome, Mohamed Park, Jae Hyun Kook, Yoon-Ah Park, Young-Seok Han, Seong Ho Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. METHODS: The study sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 44 adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, including 22 who received treatment with MCPP (age, 24.7 ± 7.7 years) and 22 who received treatment with cervical pull headgear (age, 23.0 ± 7.7 years). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were analyzed for 24 linear and angular measurements. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the changes after treatment in each group and differences in treatment effects between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the maxillary first molar and the amount of distal tipping was 4.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.9° in the MCPP group, and 2.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 8.6° in the headgear group, respectively. In addition, intrusion by 2.5 mm was observed in the MCPP group. In both groups, the distal movement of the upper lip and the increase in the nasolabial angle were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, none of the skeletal and soft tissue variables exhibited significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MCPP is an effective treatment modality for total arch distalization in adults. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2017-11 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5653686/ /pubmed/29090125 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375 Text en © 2017 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Chong Ook Sa'aed, Noor Laith Bayome, Mohamed Park, Jae Hyun Kook, Yoon-Ah Park, Young-Seok Han, Seong Ho Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
title | Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
title_full | Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
title_fullStr | Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
title_short | Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
title_sort | comparison of treatment effects between the modified c-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090125 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkchongook comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults AT saaednoorlaith comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults AT bayomemohamed comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults AT parkjaehyun comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults AT kookyoonah comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults AT parkyoungseok comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults AT hanseongho comparisonoftreatmenteffectsbetweenthemodifiedcpalatalplateandcervicalpullheadgearfortotalarchdistalizationinadults |