Cargando…
A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission
BACKGROUND: There is concern that existing models of acute hospital care will become unworkable as the health service admits an increasing number of frail older people with complex health needs, and that there is inadequate evidence to guide the planning of acute hospital level services. We aim to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2214-y |
_version_ | 1783273317472403456 |
---|---|
author | Shepperd, Sasha Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea Butler, Chris Ellis, Graham Godfrey, Mary Gray, Alastair Hemsley, Anthony Khanna, Pradeep Langhorne, Peter McCaffrey, Patricia Mirza, Lubena Pushpangadan, Maj Ramsay, Scott Schiff, Rebekah Stott, David Young, John Yu, Ly-Mee |
author_facet | Shepperd, Sasha Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea Butler, Chris Ellis, Graham Godfrey, Mary Gray, Alastair Hemsley, Anthony Khanna, Pradeep Langhorne, Peter McCaffrey, Patricia Mirza, Lubena Pushpangadan, Maj Ramsay, Scott Schiff, Rebekah Stott, David Young, John Yu, Ly-Mee |
author_sort | Shepperd, Sasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is concern that existing models of acute hospital care will become unworkable as the health service admits an increasing number of frail older people with complex health needs, and that there is inadequate evidence to guide the planning of acute hospital level services. We aim to evaluate whether geriatrician-led admission avoidance to hospital at home is an effective alternative to hospital admission. METHODS/DESIGN: We are conducting a multi-site randomised open trial of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home, compared with admission to hospital. We are recruiting older people with markers of frailty or prior dependence who have been referred to admission avoidance hospital at home for an acute medical event. This includes patients presenting with delirium, functional decline, dependence, falls, immobility or a background of dementia presenting with physical disease. Participants are randomised using a computerised random number generator to geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home or a control group of inpatient admission in a 2:1 ratio in favour of the intervention. The primary endpoint ‘living at home’ (the inverse of death or living in a residential care setting) is measured at 6 months follow-up, and we also collect data on this outcome at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of delirium, mortality, new long-term residential care, cognitive impairment, activities of daily living, quality of life and quality-adjusted survival, length of stay, readmission or transfer to hospital. We will conduct a parallel economic evaluation, and a process evaluation that includes an interview study to explore the experiences of patients and carers. DISCUSSION: Health systems around the world are examining how to provide acute hospital-level care to older adults in greater numbers with a fixed or shrinking hospital resource. This trial is the first large multi-site randomised trial of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home, and will provide evidence on alternative models of healthcare for older people who require hospital admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN60477865: Registered on 10 March 2014. Trial Sponsor: University of Oxford. Version 3.1, 14/06/2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2214-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5653984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56539842017-10-26 A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission Shepperd, Sasha Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea Butler, Chris Ellis, Graham Godfrey, Mary Gray, Alastair Hemsley, Anthony Khanna, Pradeep Langhorne, Peter McCaffrey, Patricia Mirza, Lubena Pushpangadan, Maj Ramsay, Scott Schiff, Rebekah Stott, David Young, John Yu, Ly-Mee Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is concern that existing models of acute hospital care will become unworkable as the health service admits an increasing number of frail older people with complex health needs, and that there is inadequate evidence to guide the planning of acute hospital level services. We aim to evaluate whether geriatrician-led admission avoidance to hospital at home is an effective alternative to hospital admission. METHODS/DESIGN: We are conducting a multi-site randomised open trial of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home, compared with admission to hospital. We are recruiting older people with markers of frailty or prior dependence who have been referred to admission avoidance hospital at home for an acute medical event. This includes patients presenting with delirium, functional decline, dependence, falls, immobility or a background of dementia presenting with physical disease. Participants are randomised using a computerised random number generator to geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home or a control group of inpatient admission in a 2:1 ratio in favour of the intervention. The primary endpoint ‘living at home’ (the inverse of death or living in a residential care setting) is measured at 6 months follow-up, and we also collect data on this outcome at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of delirium, mortality, new long-term residential care, cognitive impairment, activities of daily living, quality of life and quality-adjusted survival, length of stay, readmission or transfer to hospital. We will conduct a parallel economic evaluation, and a process evaluation that includes an interview study to explore the experiences of patients and carers. DISCUSSION: Health systems around the world are examining how to provide acute hospital-level care to older adults in greater numbers with a fixed or shrinking hospital resource. This trial is the first large multi-site randomised trial of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home, and will provide evidence on alternative models of healthcare for older people who require hospital admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN60477865: Registered on 10 March 2014. Trial Sponsor: University of Oxford. Version 3.1, 14/06/2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2214-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5653984/ /pubmed/29061154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2214-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Shepperd, Sasha Cradduck-Bamford, Andrea Butler, Chris Ellis, Graham Godfrey, Mary Gray, Alastair Hemsley, Anthony Khanna, Pradeep Langhorne, Peter McCaffrey, Patricia Mirza, Lubena Pushpangadan, Maj Ramsay, Scott Schiff, Rebekah Stott, David Young, John Yu, Ly-Mee A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
title | A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
title_full | A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
title_fullStr | A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
title_short | A multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
title_sort | multi-centre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness of geriatrician-led admission avoidance hospital at home versus inpatient admission |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2214-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shepperdsasha amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT cradduckbamfordandrea amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT butlerchris amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT ellisgraham amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT godfreymary amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT grayalastair amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT hemsleyanthony amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT khannapradeep amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT langhornepeter amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT mccaffreypatricia amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT mirzalubena amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT pushpangadanmaj amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT ramsayscott amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT schiffrebekah amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT stottdavid amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT youngjohn amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT yulymee amulticentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT shepperdsasha multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT cradduckbamfordandrea multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT butlerchris multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT ellisgraham multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT godfreymary multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT grayalastair multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT hemsleyanthony multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT khannapradeep multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT langhornepeter multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT mccaffreypatricia multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT mirzalubena multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT pushpangadanmaj multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT ramsayscott multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT schiffrebekah multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT stottdavid multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT youngjohn multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission AT yulymee multicentrerandomisedtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofgeriatricianledadmissionavoidancehospitalathomeversusinpatientadmission |