Cargando…

Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to test cutting efficiency of different materials against conventional alumina in an air abrasion system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The powder samples were divided into three groups: Group 1 - alumina (control), Group 2 - 45S5 bioactive glass, and Group 3 -...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Umair, Farooq, Imran, Moheet, Imran Alam, AlShwaimi, Emad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Qassim Uninversity 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085264
_version_ 1783273364546125824
author Hassan, Umair
Farooq, Imran
Moheet, Imran Alam
AlShwaimi, Emad
author_facet Hassan, Umair
Farooq, Imran
Moheet, Imran Alam
AlShwaimi, Emad
author_sort Hassan, Umair
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to test cutting efficiency of different materials against conventional alumina in an air abrasion system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The powder samples were divided into three groups: Group 1 - alumina (control), Group 2 - 45S5 bioactive glass, and Group 3 - hydroxyapatite. 30 microscope glass slides of 0.5 mm thickness were used as an alternative of human enamel and were also divided randomly into these three groups. The time taken by the abrasive particles to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was recorded with a stop watch. In addition, morphology of the particles was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A t-test was used to compare the times taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slides, and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean time taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was 2.96 s and 23.01s for Groups 1 and 2, respectively, whereas powder of Group 3 did not cut after 120 s. The differences between cutting times of Groups 1 and 2 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SEM micrographs revealed coarse angular shape for particles of Groups 1 and 2 but Group 3 particles were with round ends and presence of smaller particles was also observed in Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: The alumina particles demonstrated excellent cutting efficiency followed by 45S5 particles. The use of bioactive glass particles should be encouraged for cutting purposes whenever a shortage of time for practitioners is not a concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5654181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Qassim Uninversity
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56541812017-10-30 Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system Hassan, Umair Farooq, Imran Moheet, Imran Alam AlShwaimi, Emad Int J Health Sci (Qassim) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to test cutting efficiency of different materials against conventional alumina in an air abrasion system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The powder samples were divided into three groups: Group 1 - alumina (control), Group 2 - 45S5 bioactive glass, and Group 3 - hydroxyapatite. 30 microscope glass slides of 0.5 mm thickness were used as an alternative of human enamel and were also divided randomly into these three groups. The time taken by the abrasive particles to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was recorded with a stop watch. In addition, morphology of the particles was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A t-test was used to compare the times taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slides, and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean time taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was 2.96 s and 23.01s for Groups 1 and 2, respectively, whereas powder of Group 3 did not cut after 120 s. The differences between cutting times of Groups 1 and 2 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SEM micrographs revealed coarse angular shape for particles of Groups 1 and 2 but Group 3 particles were with round ends and presence of smaller particles was also observed in Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: The alumina particles demonstrated excellent cutting efficiency followed by 45S5 particles. The use of bioactive glass particles should be encouraged for cutting purposes whenever a shortage of time for practitioners is not a concern. Qassim Uninversity 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5654181/ /pubmed/29085264 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Health Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hassan, Umair
Farooq, Imran
Moheet, Imran Alam
AlShwaimi, Emad
Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
title Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
title_full Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
title_fullStr Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
title_full_unstemmed Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
title_short Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
title_sort cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085264
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanumair cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem
AT farooqimran cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem
AT moheetimranalam cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem
AT alshwaimiemad cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem