Cargando…
Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to test cutting efficiency of different materials against conventional alumina in an air abrasion system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The powder samples were divided into three groups: Group 1 - alumina (control), Group 2 - 45S5 bioactive glass, and Group 3 -...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Qassim Uninversity
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085264 |
_version_ | 1783273364546125824 |
---|---|
author | Hassan, Umair Farooq, Imran Moheet, Imran Alam AlShwaimi, Emad |
author_facet | Hassan, Umair Farooq, Imran Moheet, Imran Alam AlShwaimi, Emad |
author_sort | Hassan, Umair |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to test cutting efficiency of different materials against conventional alumina in an air abrasion system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The powder samples were divided into three groups: Group 1 - alumina (control), Group 2 - 45S5 bioactive glass, and Group 3 - hydroxyapatite. 30 microscope glass slides of 0.5 mm thickness were used as an alternative of human enamel and were also divided randomly into these three groups. The time taken by the abrasive particles to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was recorded with a stop watch. In addition, morphology of the particles was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A t-test was used to compare the times taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slides, and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean time taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was 2.96 s and 23.01s for Groups 1 and 2, respectively, whereas powder of Group 3 did not cut after 120 s. The differences between cutting times of Groups 1 and 2 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SEM micrographs revealed coarse angular shape for particles of Groups 1 and 2 but Group 3 particles were with round ends and presence of smaller particles was also observed in Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: The alumina particles demonstrated excellent cutting efficiency followed by 45S5 particles. The use of bioactive glass particles should be encouraged for cutting purposes whenever a shortage of time for practitioners is not a concern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5654181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Qassim Uninversity |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56541812017-10-30 Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system Hassan, Umair Farooq, Imran Moheet, Imran Alam AlShwaimi, Emad Int J Health Sci (Qassim) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to test cutting efficiency of different materials against conventional alumina in an air abrasion system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The powder samples were divided into three groups: Group 1 - alumina (control), Group 2 - 45S5 bioactive glass, and Group 3 - hydroxyapatite. 30 microscope glass slides of 0.5 mm thickness were used as an alternative of human enamel and were also divided randomly into these three groups. The time taken by the abrasive particles to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was recorded with a stop watch. In addition, morphology of the particles was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A t-test was used to compare the times taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slides, and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean time taken to cut a hole through the microscope glass slide was 2.96 s and 23.01s for Groups 1 and 2, respectively, whereas powder of Group 3 did not cut after 120 s. The differences between cutting times of Groups 1 and 2 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SEM micrographs revealed coarse angular shape for particles of Groups 1 and 2 but Group 3 particles were with round ends and presence of smaller particles was also observed in Groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: The alumina particles demonstrated excellent cutting efficiency followed by 45S5 particles. The use of bioactive glass particles should be encouraged for cutting purposes whenever a shortage of time for practitioners is not a concern. Qassim Uninversity 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5654181/ /pubmed/29085264 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Health Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hassan, Umair Farooq, Imran Moheet, Imran Alam AlShwaimi, Emad Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
title | Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
title_full | Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
title_fullStr | Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
title_full_unstemmed | Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
title_short | Cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
title_sort | cutting efficiency of different dental materials utilized in an air abrasion system |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassanumair cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem AT farooqimran cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem AT moheetimranalam cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem AT alshwaimiemad cuttingefficiencyofdifferentdentalmaterialsutilizedinanairabrasionsystem |