Cargando…
Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India
BACKGROUND: India continues to contribute disproportionately to the global burden of disease and public health research output from India is also known to be not commensurate with her healthcare needs. We carried out the present study to assess if clinical trials were in line with the health care ne...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109934 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.215970 |
_version_ | 1783273373153886208 |
---|---|
author | Chaturvedi, Mansi Gogtay, Nithya J. Thatte, Urmila M. |
author_facet | Chaturvedi, Mansi Gogtay, Nithya J. Thatte, Urmila M. |
author_sort | Chaturvedi, Mansi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: India continues to contribute disproportionately to the global burden of disease and public health research output from India is also known to be not commensurate with her healthcare needs. We carried out the present study to assess if clinical trials were in line with the health care needs of the country by auditing the clinical trials registry of India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the clinical studies registered in CTRI between July 20, 2007 and December 31, 2015 were searched in the “Trial Search” section. The total number of studies, their phases of development, and therapeutic areas were assessed. Trials in each therapeutic area was compared with the disease burden (DALYs) in that area taken from Global Health Estimates [2014] Summary Tables of the WHO. The number of trials conducted per state in India was also compared with the population of that state [Census 2011]. RESULTS: A total of 6474 studies were registered of which 3325 (51.4%) were clinical trials. The state of Maharashtra had the highest number trials [16.4%] followed by Karnataka (11.6%) and Tamil Nadu (10%). Populous states like Uttar Pradesh (5.3%) and Bihar (1.4%) had far fewer trials. The largest number of trials was in the area of cancer (16.4%), followed by diabetes (12.1%) and cardiovascular diseases (10.1%). Infectious and parasitic diseases had the highest DALYs (82,681) and ranked first in disease burden but accounted for only 5% of the total trials and ranked 7th according to number of trials. Cancer ranked first in the number of trials (16.4%), but ranked 6th based on DALYs. CONCLUSION: Clinical trials conducted in India are not in consonance with her health care needs. Strengthening the capacity for conducting trials in the populous states and the north-eastern part of the country is necessary to allow a more equitable selection of participants. The government should introduce policies to encourage new drug development in areas where needed the most. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5654216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56542162017-11-06 Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India Chaturvedi, Mansi Gogtay, Nithya J. Thatte, Urmila M. Perspect Clin Res Original Article BACKGROUND: India continues to contribute disproportionately to the global burden of disease and public health research output from India is also known to be not commensurate with her healthcare needs. We carried out the present study to assess if clinical trials were in line with the health care needs of the country by auditing the clinical trials registry of India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the clinical studies registered in CTRI between July 20, 2007 and December 31, 2015 were searched in the “Trial Search” section. The total number of studies, their phases of development, and therapeutic areas were assessed. Trials in each therapeutic area was compared with the disease burden (DALYs) in that area taken from Global Health Estimates [2014] Summary Tables of the WHO. The number of trials conducted per state in India was also compared with the population of that state [Census 2011]. RESULTS: A total of 6474 studies were registered of which 3325 (51.4%) were clinical trials. The state of Maharashtra had the highest number trials [16.4%] followed by Karnataka (11.6%) and Tamil Nadu (10%). Populous states like Uttar Pradesh (5.3%) and Bihar (1.4%) had far fewer trials. The largest number of trials was in the area of cancer (16.4%), followed by diabetes (12.1%) and cardiovascular diseases (10.1%). Infectious and parasitic diseases had the highest DALYs (82,681) and ranked first in disease burden but accounted for only 5% of the total trials and ranked 7th according to number of trials. Cancer ranked first in the number of trials (16.4%), but ranked 6th based on DALYs. CONCLUSION: Clinical trials conducted in India are not in consonance with her health care needs. Strengthening the capacity for conducting trials in the populous states and the north-eastern part of the country is necessary to allow a more equitable selection of participants. The government should introduce policies to encourage new drug development in areas where needed the most. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5654216/ /pubmed/29109934 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.215970 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chaturvedi, Mansi Gogtay, Nithya J. Thatte, Urmila M. Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India |
title | Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India |
title_full | Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India |
title_fullStr | Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India |
title_full_unstemmed | Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India |
title_short | Do clinical trials conducted in India match its healthcare needs? An audit of the Clinical Trials Registry of India |
title_sort | do clinical trials conducted in india match its healthcare needs? an audit of the clinical trials registry of india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109934 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.215970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaturvedimansi doclinicaltrialsconductedinindiamatchitshealthcareneedsanauditoftheclinicaltrialsregistryofindia AT gogtaynithyaj doclinicaltrialsconductedinindiamatchitshealthcareneedsanauditoftheclinicaltrialsregistryofindia AT thatteurmilam doclinicaltrialsconductedinindiamatchitshealthcareneedsanauditoftheclinicaltrialsregistryofindia |