Cargando…

Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials

BACKGROUND: Surface roughness associated with improper finishing/polishing of restorations can result in plaque accumulation, gingival irritation, surface staining, and poor esthetic of restored teeth. The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of various finishing and polishing systems and time usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madhyastha, Prashanthi Sampath, Hegde, Shreya, Srikant, N., Kotian, Ravindra, Iyer, Srividhya Sriraman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109747
_version_ 1783273375923175424
author Madhyastha, Prashanthi Sampath
Hegde, Shreya
Srikant, N.
Kotian, Ravindra
Iyer, Srividhya Sriraman
author_facet Madhyastha, Prashanthi Sampath
Hegde, Shreya
Srikant, N.
Kotian, Ravindra
Iyer, Srividhya Sriraman
author_sort Madhyastha, Prashanthi Sampath
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surface roughness associated with improper finishing/polishing of restorations can result in plaque accumulation, gingival irritation, surface staining, and poor esthetic of restored teeth. The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of various finishing and polishing systems and time using various procedures on surface roughness of some esthetic restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, samples of two composite materials, compomer and glass ionomer cement (GIC) materials, were fabricated. Finishing and polishing were done immediately (n = 40) and after 1 week (n = 40) using four systems (diamond bur + soflex discs; diamond bur + Astropol polishing brush; tungsten carbide bur + soflex discs; tungsten carbide bur + Astropol polishing brush). Surface roughness was measured using surface profilometer. Data were statistically analyzed by t-test (for each material and time period) and one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc (for finishing and polishing systems) at a significant level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Analysis of time period, irrespective of finishing and polishing system showed that Ra values were greater (P < 0.05) in delayed polishing in GIC > Z100 > Filtek P90 > Dyract AP, suggesting immediate polishing is better. Among the materials, Filtek P90 had the least Ra values indicating the smoothest surface among all materials, followed by Z100, Dyract AP, and GIC. Comparison of polishing and finishing systems irrespective of materials showed that Ra values were lower (P > 0.05) in diamond + Astropol combination whereas diamond + soflex had the greatest Ra values. CONCLUSION: It might be concluded that: (i) Filtek P90 showed least Ra values followed by < Z100 < Dyract < GIC; (ii) immediate (24 h) finishing/polishing of materials is better than delayed; and (iii) among all these polishing systems, diamond bur–Astropol and Astrobrush showed good surface finish.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5654227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56542272017-11-06 Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials Madhyastha, Prashanthi Sampath Hegde, Shreya Srikant, N. Kotian, Ravindra Iyer, Srividhya Sriraman Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Surface roughness associated with improper finishing/polishing of restorations can result in plaque accumulation, gingival irritation, surface staining, and poor esthetic of restored teeth. The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of various finishing and polishing systems and time using various procedures on surface roughness of some esthetic restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, samples of two composite materials, compomer and glass ionomer cement (GIC) materials, were fabricated. Finishing and polishing were done immediately (n = 40) and after 1 week (n = 40) using four systems (diamond bur + soflex discs; diamond bur + Astropol polishing brush; tungsten carbide bur + soflex discs; tungsten carbide bur + Astropol polishing brush). Surface roughness was measured using surface profilometer. Data were statistically analyzed by t-test (for each material and time period) and one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc (for finishing and polishing systems) at a significant level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Analysis of time period, irrespective of finishing and polishing system showed that Ra values were greater (P < 0.05) in delayed polishing in GIC > Z100 > Filtek P90 > Dyract AP, suggesting immediate polishing is better. Among the materials, Filtek P90 had the least Ra values indicating the smoothest surface among all materials, followed by Z100, Dyract AP, and GIC. Comparison of polishing and finishing systems irrespective of materials showed that Ra values were lower (P > 0.05) in diamond + Astropol combination whereas diamond + soflex had the greatest Ra values. CONCLUSION: It might be concluded that: (i) Filtek P90 showed least Ra values followed by < Z100 < Dyract < GIC; (ii) immediate (24 h) finishing/polishing of materials is better than delayed; and (iii) among all these polishing systems, diamond bur–Astropol and Astrobrush showed good surface finish. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5654227/ /pubmed/29109747 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Madhyastha, Prashanthi Sampath
Hegde, Shreya
Srikant, N.
Kotian, Ravindra
Iyer, Srividhya Sriraman
Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
title Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
title_full Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
title_fullStr Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
title_short Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
title_sort effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109747
work_keys_str_mv AT madhyasthaprashanthisampath effectoffinishingpolishingtechniquesandtimeonsurfaceroughnessofestheticrestorativematerials
AT hegdeshreya effectoffinishingpolishingtechniquesandtimeonsurfaceroughnessofestheticrestorativematerials
AT srikantn effectoffinishingpolishingtechniquesandtimeonsurfaceroughnessofestheticrestorativematerials
AT kotianravindra effectoffinishingpolishingtechniquesandtimeonsurfaceroughnessofestheticrestorativematerials
AT iyersrividhyasriraman effectoffinishingpolishingtechniquesandtimeonsurfaceroughnessofestheticrestorativematerials