Cargando…

A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System

The purpose of this study was to understand the pros and cons of the lengthening nails which have their own mechanical mechanism; we propose a classification for “device-related complications” arising from mechanical properties of the nail itself. From March 2010 to March 2014, 115 segments of lower...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Dong Hoon, Kim, Sungmin, Lee, Jung Woo, Park, Hoon, Kim, Tae Yoon, Kim, Hyun Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29130046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8032510
_version_ 1783273395028230144
author Lee, Dong Hoon
Kim, Sungmin
Lee, Jung Woo
Park, Hoon
Kim, Tae Yoon
Kim, Hyun Woo
author_facet Lee, Dong Hoon
Kim, Sungmin
Lee, Jung Woo
Park, Hoon
Kim, Tae Yoon
Kim, Hyun Woo
author_sort Lee, Dong Hoon
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to understand the pros and cons of the lengthening nails which have their own mechanical mechanism; we propose a classification for “device-related complications” arising from mechanical properties of the nail itself. From March 2010 to March 2014, 115 segments of lower limb lengthening were performed using intramedullary lengthening nails (35 ISKD, 34 PRECICE1, and 46 PRECICE2). Device-related complications were sorted into three categories according to a new classification: distraction control-related (type I), stability related (type II), and other device-related (type III); these were subdivided using Paley's concept of problems (a), obstacles (b), and sequel (c). Most common complications were distraction mechanism issues (type I) in ISKD and mechanical strength related ones (type II) in PRECICE1 and PRECICE2. Sixty percent (21/35) of ISKD had device-related problems. In PRECICE1 group, 8.8% (3/34) had device-related problems, and 8.8% (3/34) showed device-related obstacle. In PRECICE2, forty-four percent (20/46) had device-related problems. In conclusion, a new classification showed more clearly the differences of mechanical characteristics of different nails. The most essential thing of future lengthening nail development is minimizing the types I and II complications. Further study is necessary to compare the mechanical strength and stability of lengthening nails.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5654310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56543102017-11-12 A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System Lee, Dong Hoon Kim, Sungmin Lee, Jung Woo Park, Hoon Kim, Tae Yoon Kim, Hyun Woo Biomed Res Int Clinical Study The purpose of this study was to understand the pros and cons of the lengthening nails which have their own mechanical mechanism; we propose a classification for “device-related complications” arising from mechanical properties of the nail itself. From March 2010 to March 2014, 115 segments of lower limb lengthening were performed using intramedullary lengthening nails (35 ISKD, 34 PRECICE1, and 46 PRECICE2). Device-related complications were sorted into three categories according to a new classification: distraction control-related (type I), stability related (type II), and other device-related (type III); these were subdivided using Paley's concept of problems (a), obstacles (b), and sequel (c). Most common complications were distraction mechanism issues (type I) in ISKD and mechanical strength related ones (type II) in PRECICE1 and PRECICE2. Sixty percent (21/35) of ISKD had device-related problems. In PRECICE1 group, 8.8% (3/34) had device-related problems, and 8.8% (3/34) showed device-related obstacle. In PRECICE2, forty-four percent (20/46) had device-related problems. In conclusion, a new classification showed more clearly the differences of mechanical characteristics of different nails. The most essential thing of future lengthening nail development is minimizing the types I and II complications. Further study is necessary to compare the mechanical strength and stability of lengthening nails. Hindawi 2017 2017-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5654310/ /pubmed/29130046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8032510 Text en Copyright © 2017 Dong Hoon Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lee, Dong Hoon
Kim, Sungmin
Lee, Jung Woo
Park, Hoon
Kim, Tae Yoon
Kim, Hyun Woo
A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
title A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
title_full A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
title_short A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
title_sort comparison of the device-related complications of intramedullary lengthening nails using a new classification system
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29130046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8032510
work_keys_str_mv AT leedonghoon acomparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT kimsungmin acomparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT leejungwoo acomparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT parkhoon acomparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT kimtaeyoon acomparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT kimhyunwoo acomparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT leedonghoon comparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT kimsungmin comparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT leejungwoo comparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT parkhoon comparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT kimtaeyoon comparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem
AT kimhyunwoo comparisonofthedevicerelatedcomplicationsofintramedullarylengtheningnailsusinganewclassificationsystem