Cargando…

Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIM: Web 2.0 internet technology has great potential in promoting physical activity. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour, and the impact on website usage and engagement. METHODS: 504 (328 women, 126 men) insufficiently a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolt, Gregory S, Rosenkranz, Richard R, Vandelanotte, Corneel, Caperchione, Cristina M, Maeder, Anthony J, Tague, Rhys, Savage, Trevor N, Van, Itallie Anetta, Mummery, W Kerry, Oldmeadow, Christopher, Duncan, Mitch J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096890
_version_ 1783273421000409088
author Kolt, Gregory S
Rosenkranz, Richard R
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Caperchione, Cristina M
Maeder, Anthony J
Tague, Rhys
Savage, Trevor N
Van, Itallie Anetta
Mummery, W Kerry
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Duncan, Mitch J
author_facet Kolt, Gregory S
Rosenkranz, Richard R
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Caperchione, Cristina M
Maeder, Anthony J
Tague, Rhys
Savage, Trevor N
Van, Itallie Anetta
Mummery, W Kerry
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Duncan, Mitch J
author_sort Kolt, Gregory S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: Web 2.0 internet technology has great potential in promoting physical activity. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour, and the impact on website usage and engagement. METHODS: 504 (328 women, 126 men) insufficiently active adult participants were randomly allocated to one of two web-based interventions or a paper-based Logbook group. The Web 1.0 group participated in the existing 10 000 Steps programme, while the Web 2.0 group participated in a Web 2.0-enabled physical activity intervention including user-to-user interaction through social networking capabilities. ActiGraph GT3X activity monitors were used to assess physical activity at four points across the intervention (0, 3, 12 and 18 months), and usage and engagement were assessed continuously through website usage statistics. RESULTS: Treatment groups differed significantly in trajectories of minutes/day of physical activity (p=0.0198), through a greater change at 3 months for Web 2.0 than Web 1.0 (7.3 min/day, 95% CI 2.4 to 12.3). In the Web 2.0 group, physical activity increased at 3 (mean change 6.8 min/day, 95% CI 3.9 to 9.6) and 12 months (3.8 min/day, 95% CI 0.5 to 7.0), but not 18 months. The Logbook group also increased physical activity at 3 (4.8 min/day, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.7) and 12 months (4.9 min/day, 95% CI 0.7 to 9.1), but not 18 months. The Web 1.0 group increased physical activity at 12 months only (4.9 min/day, 95% CI 0.5 to 9.3). The Web 2.0 group demonstrated higher levels of website engagement (p=0.3964). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to a Web 1.0 intervention, a more interactive Web 2.0 intervention, as well as the paper-based Logbook intervention, improved physical activity in the short term, but that effect reduced over time, despite higher levels of engagement of the Web 2.0 group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000157976.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5654748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56547482017-10-27 Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial Kolt, Gregory S Rosenkranz, Richard R Vandelanotte, Corneel Caperchione, Cristina M Maeder, Anthony J Tague, Rhys Savage, Trevor N Van, Itallie Anetta Mummery, W Kerry Oldmeadow, Christopher Duncan, Mitch J Br J Sports Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIM: Web 2.0 internet technology has great potential in promoting physical activity. This trial investigated the effectiveness of a Web 2.0-based intervention on physical activity behaviour, and the impact on website usage and engagement. METHODS: 504 (328 women, 126 men) insufficiently active adult participants were randomly allocated to one of two web-based interventions or a paper-based Logbook group. The Web 1.0 group participated in the existing 10 000 Steps programme, while the Web 2.0 group participated in a Web 2.0-enabled physical activity intervention including user-to-user interaction through social networking capabilities. ActiGraph GT3X activity monitors were used to assess physical activity at four points across the intervention (0, 3, 12 and 18 months), and usage and engagement were assessed continuously through website usage statistics. RESULTS: Treatment groups differed significantly in trajectories of minutes/day of physical activity (p=0.0198), through a greater change at 3 months for Web 2.0 than Web 1.0 (7.3 min/day, 95% CI 2.4 to 12.3). In the Web 2.0 group, physical activity increased at 3 (mean change 6.8 min/day, 95% CI 3.9 to 9.6) and 12 months (3.8 min/day, 95% CI 0.5 to 7.0), but not 18 months. The Logbook group also increased physical activity at 3 (4.8 min/day, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.7) and 12 months (4.9 min/day, 95% CI 0.7 to 9.1), but not 18 months. The Web 1.0 group increased physical activity at 12 months only (4.9 min/day, 95% CI 0.5 to 9.3). The Web 2.0 group demonstrated higher levels of website engagement (p=0.3964). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to a Web 1.0 intervention, a more interactive Web 2.0 intervention, as well as the paper-based Logbook intervention, improved physical activity in the short term, but that effect reduced over time, despite higher levels of engagement of the Web 2.0 group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000157976. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5654748/ /pubmed/28049624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096890 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Kolt, Gregory S
Rosenkranz, Richard R
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Caperchione, Cristina M
Maeder, Anthony J
Tague, Rhys
Savage, Trevor N
Van, Itallie Anetta
Mummery, W Kerry
Oldmeadow, Christopher
Duncan, Mitch J
Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
title Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
title_full Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
title_short Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
title_sort using web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the walk 2.0 randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096890
work_keys_str_mv AT koltgregorys usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rosenkranzrichardr usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandelanottecorneel usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT caperchionecristinam usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maederanthonyj usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taguerhys usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT savagetrevorn usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanitallieanetta usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mummerywkerry usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oldmeadowchristopher usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duncanmitchj usingweb20applicationstopromotehealthrelatedphysicalactivityfindingsfromthewalk20randomisedcontrolledtrial