Cargando…

Measurement and modeling of particulate matter concentrations: Applying spatial analysis and regression techniques to assess air quality

This paper presented the levels of PM(2.5) and PM(10) in different stations at the city of Sabzevar, Iran. Furthermore, this study was an attempt to evaluate spatial interpolation methods for determining the PM(2.5) and PM(10) concentrations in the city of Sabzevar. Particulate matters were measured...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sajjadi, Seyed Ali, Zolfaghari, Ghasem, Adab, Hamed, Allahabadi, Ahmad, Delsouz, Mehri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2017.09.006
Descripción
Sumario:This paper presented the levels of PM(2.5) and PM(10) in different stations at the city of Sabzevar, Iran. Furthermore, this study was an attempt to evaluate spatial interpolation methods for determining the PM(2.5) and PM(10) concentrations in the city of Sabzevar. Particulate matters were measured by Haz-Dust EPAM at 48 stations. Then, four interpolating models, including Radial Basis Functions (RBF), Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Ordinary Kriging (OK), and Universal Kriging (UK) were used to investigate the status of air pollution in the city. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) were employed to compare the four models. The results showed that the PM(2.5) concentrations in the stations were between 10 and 500 μg/m(3). Furthermore, the PM(10) concentrations for all of 48 stations ranged from 20 to 1500 μg/m(3). The concentrations obtained for the period of nine months were greater than the standard limits. There was difference in the values of MAPE, RMSE, MBE, and MAE. The results indicated that the MAPE in IDW method was lower than other methods: (41.05 for PM(2.5) and 25.89 for PM(10)). The best interpolation method for the particulate matter (PM(2.5) and PM(10)) seemed to be IDW method. • The PM(10) and PM(2.5) concentration measurements were performed in the period of warm and risky in terms of particulate matter at 2016. • Concentrations of PM(2.5) and PM(10) were measured by a monitoring device, environmental dust model Haz-Dust EPAM 5000. • Interpolation is used to convert data from observation points to continuous fields to compare spatial patterns sampled by these measurements with spatial patterns of other spatial entities.