Cargando…

Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint

Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long‐term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitzes, Justin, Berlow, Eric, Conlisk, Erin, Erb, Karlheinz, Iha, Katsunori, Martinez, Neo, Newman, Erica A., Plutzar, Christoph, Smith, Adam B., Harte, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/con4.12321
_version_ 1783273593337020416
author Kitzes, Justin
Berlow, Eric
Conlisk, Erin
Erb, Karlheinz
Iha, Katsunori
Martinez, Neo
Newman, Erica A.
Plutzar, Christoph
Smith, Adam B.
Harte, John
author_facet Kitzes, Justin
Berlow, Eric
Conlisk, Erin
Erb, Karlheinz
Iha, Katsunori
Martinez, Neo
Newman, Erica A.
Plutzar, Christoph
Smith, Adam B.
Harte, John
author_sort Kitzes, Justin
collection PubMed
description Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long‐term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional wildlife footprints, while per‐person footprints are highest in Mongolia, Australia, Botswana, and the United Arab Emirates. A US$100 purchase of bovine meat or rice products occupies approximately 0.1 km(2) of wild bird ranges, displacing 1–2 individual birds, for 1 year. Globally significant importer regions, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France, have large footprints that drive wildlife losses elsewhere in the world and represent important targets for consumption‐focused conservation attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5655738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56557382017-11-01 Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint Kitzes, Justin Berlow, Eric Conlisk, Erin Erb, Karlheinz Iha, Katsunori Martinez, Neo Newman, Erica A. Plutzar, Christoph Smith, Adam B. Harte, John Conserv Lett Letters Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long‐term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional wildlife footprints, while per‐person footprints are highest in Mongolia, Australia, Botswana, and the United Arab Emirates. A US$100 purchase of bovine meat or rice products occupies approximately 0.1 km(2) of wild bird ranges, displacing 1–2 individual birds, for 1 year. Globally significant importer regions, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France, have large footprints that drive wildlife losses elsewhere in the world and represent important targets for consumption‐focused conservation attention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5655738/ /pubmed/29104616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/con4.12321 Text en Copyright and Photocopying: © 2016 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Kitzes, Justin
Berlow, Eric
Conlisk, Erin
Erb, Karlheinz
Iha, Katsunori
Martinez, Neo
Newman, Erica A.
Plutzar, Christoph
Smith, Adam B.
Harte, John
Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
title Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
title_full Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
title_fullStr Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
title_full_unstemmed Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
title_short Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
title_sort consumption‐based conservation targeting: linking biodiversity loss to upstream demand through a global wildlife footprint
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/con4.12321
work_keys_str_mv AT kitzesjustin consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT berloweric consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT conliskerin consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT erbkarlheinz consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT ihakatsunori consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT martinezneo consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT newmanericaa consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT plutzarchristoph consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT smithadamb consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint
AT hartejohn consumptionbasedconservationtargetinglinkingbiodiversitylosstoupstreamdemandthroughaglobalwildlifefootprint