Cargando…

What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?

OBJECTIVES: Response rates to health‐related surveys are declining. This study tested two strategies to improve the response rate to a health psychology survey mailed through English general practices: (1) sending a shortened questionnaire and (2) offering a monetary incentive to return a completed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robb, Kathryn A., Gatting, Lauren, Wardle, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12239
_version_ 1783273593808879616
author Robb, Kathryn A.
Gatting, Lauren
Wardle, Jane
author_facet Robb, Kathryn A.
Gatting, Lauren
Wardle, Jane
author_sort Robb, Kathryn A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Response rates to health‐related surveys are declining. This study tested two strategies to improve the response rate to a health psychology survey mailed through English general practices: (1) sending a shortened questionnaire and (2) offering a monetary incentive to return a completed questionnaire. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Adults (n = 4,241) aged 45–59 years, from four General Practices in South‐East England, were mailed a survey on attitudes towards bowel cancer screening. Using a 2 × 4 factorial design, participants were randomized to receive a ‘short’ (four A4 pages) or a ‘long’ (seven A4 pages) questionnaire, and one of four monetary incentives to return a completed questionnaire – (1) no monetary incentive, (2) £2.50 shop voucher, (3) £5.00 shop voucher, and (4) inclusion in a £250 shop voucher prize draw. Age, gender, and area‐level deprivation were obtained from the General Practices. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 41% (n = 1,589). Response to the ‘short’ questionnaire (42%) was not significantly different from the ‘long’ questionnaire (40%). The £2.50 incentive (43%) significantly improved response rates in univariate analyses, and remained significant after controlling for age, gender, area‐level deprivation, and questionnaire length. The £5.00 (42%) and £250 prize draw (41%) incentives had no significant impact on response rates compared to no incentive (38%). CONCLUSIONS: A small monetary incentive (£2.50) may slightly increase response to a mailed health psychology survey. The length of the questionnaire (four pages vs. seven pages) did not influence response. Although frequently used, entry into a prize draw did not increase response. Achieving representative samples remains a challenge for health psychology. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject Response rates to mailed questionnaires continue to decline, threatening the representativeness of data. Prize draw incentives are frequently used but there is little evidence to support their efficacy. Research on interactions between incentives, questionnaire length, and demographics is lacking. What does this study add Contrary to previous findings, questionnaire length did not influence response rate. A £2.50 incentive increased response, while incentives of £5.00 and a £250 prize draw did not. Achieving representative samples to questionnaires remains a challenge for health psychology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5655741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56557412017-11-01 What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response? Robb, Kathryn A. Gatting, Lauren Wardle, Jane Br J Health Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Response rates to health‐related surveys are declining. This study tested two strategies to improve the response rate to a health psychology survey mailed through English general practices: (1) sending a shortened questionnaire and (2) offering a monetary incentive to return a completed questionnaire. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Adults (n = 4,241) aged 45–59 years, from four General Practices in South‐East England, were mailed a survey on attitudes towards bowel cancer screening. Using a 2 × 4 factorial design, participants were randomized to receive a ‘short’ (four A4 pages) or a ‘long’ (seven A4 pages) questionnaire, and one of four monetary incentives to return a completed questionnaire – (1) no monetary incentive, (2) £2.50 shop voucher, (3) £5.00 shop voucher, and (4) inclusion in a £250 shop voucher prize draw. Age, gender, and area‐level deprivation were obtained from the General Practices. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 41% (n = 1,589). Response to the ‘short’ questionnaire (42%) was not significantly different from the ‘long’ questionnaire (40%). The £2.50 incentive (43%) significantly improved response rates in univariate analyses, and remained significant after controlling for age, gender, area‐level deprivation, and questionnaire length. The £5.00 (42%) and £250 prize draw (41%) incentives had no significant impact on response rates compared to no incentive (38%). CONCLUSIONS: A small monetary incentive (£2.50) may slightly increase response to a mailed health psychology survey. The length of the questionnaire (four pages vs. seven pages) did not influence response. Although frequently used, entry into a prize draw did not increase response. Achieving representative samples remains a challenge for health psychology. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject Response rates to mailed questionnaires continue to decline, threatening the representativeness of data. Prize draw incentives are frequently used but there is little evidence to support their efficacy. Research on interactions between incentives, questionnaire length, and demographics is lacking. What does this study add Contrary to previous findings, questionnaire length did not influence response rate. A £2.50 incentive increased response, while incentives of £5.00 and a £250 prize draw did not. Achieving representative samples to questionnaires remains a challenge for health psychology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-19 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5655741/ /pubmed/28422369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12239 Text en © 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Robb, Kathryn A.
Gatting, Lauren
Wardle, Jane
What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
title What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
title_full What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
title_fullStr What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
title_full_unstemmed What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
title_short What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
title_sort what impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12239
work_keys_str_mv AT robbkathryna whatimpactdoquestionnairelengthandmonetaryincentiveshaveonmailedhealthpsychologysurveyresponse
AT gattinglauren whatimpactdoquestionnairelengthandmonetaryincentiveshaveonmailedhealthpsychologysurveyresponse
AT wardlejane whatimpactdoquestionnairelengthandmonetaryincentiveshaveonmailedhealthpsychologysurveyresponse