Cargando…
Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard method used to study bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the subtle, spatially complex changes in bone mass due to strain‐adaptive bone remodeling relevant to different prosthesis designs are not rea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.23536 |
_version_ | 1783273632057786368 |
---|---|
author | Farzi, Mohsen Morris, Richard M. Penny, Jeannette Yang, Lang Pozo, Jose M. Overgaard, Søren Frangi, Alejandro F. Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark |
author_facet | Farzi, Mohsen Morris, Richard M. Penny, Jeannette Yang, Lang Pozo, Jose M. Overgaard, Søren Frangi, Alejandro F. Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark |
author_sort | Farzi, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard method used to study bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the subtle, spatially complex changes in bone mass due to strain‐adaptive bone remodeling relevant to different prosthesis designs are not readily resolved using conventional DXA analysis. DXA region free analysis (DXA RFA) is a novel computational image analysis technique that provides a high‐resolution quantitation of periprosthetic BMD. Here, we applied the technique to quantitate the magnitude and areal size of periprosthetic BMD changes using scans acquired during two previous randomized clinical trials (2004 to 2009); one comparing three cemented prosthesis design geometries, and the other comparing a hip resurfacing versus a conventional cementless prosthesis. DXA RFA resolved subtle differences in magnitude and area of bone remodeling between prosthesis designs not previously identified in conventional DXA analyses. A mean bone loss of 10.3%, 12.1%, and 11.1% occurred for the three cemented prostheses within a bone area fraction of 14.8%, 14.4%, and 6.2%, mostly within the lesser trochanter (p < 0.001). For the cementless prosthesis, a diffuse pattern of bone loss (−14.3%) was observed at the shaft of femur in a small area fraction of 0.6% versus no significant bone loss for the hip resurfacing prosthesis (p < 0.001). BMD increases were observed consistently at the greater trochanter for all prostheses except the hip‐resurfacing prosthesis, where BMD increase was widespread across the metaphysis (p < 0.001). DXA RFA provides high‐resolution insights into the effect of prosthesis design on the local strain environment in bone. © 2017 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 35:2203–2210, 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5655934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56559342017-11-01 Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) Farzi, Mohsen Morris, Richard M. Penny, Jeannette Yang, Lang Pozo, Jose M. Overgaard, Søren Frangi, Alejandro F. Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark J Orthop Res Research Articles Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard method used to study bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the subtle, spatially complex changes in bone mass due to strain‐adaptive bone remodeling relevant to different prosthesis designs are not readily resolved using conventional DXA analysis. DXA region free analysis (DXA RFA) is a novel computational image analysis technique that provides a high‐resolution quantitation of periprosthetic BMD. Here, we applied the technique to quantitate the magnitude and areal size of periprosthetic BMD changes using scans acquired during two previous randomized clinical trials (2004 to 2009); one comparing three cemented prosthesis design geometries, and the other comparing a hip resurfacing versus a conventional cementless prosthesis. DXA RFA resolved subtle differences in magnitude and area of bone remodeling between prosthesis designs not previously identified in conventional DXA analyses. A mean bone loss of 10.3%, 12.1%, and 11.1% occurred for the three cemented prostheses within a bone area fraction of 14.8%, 14.4%, and 6.2%, mostly within the lesser trochanter (p < 0.001). For the cementless prosthesis, a diffuse pattern of bone loss (−14.3%) was observed at the shaft of femur in a small area fraction of 0.6% versus no significant bone loss for the hip resurfacing prosthesis (p < 0.001). BMD increases were observed consistently at the greater trochanter for all prostheses except the hip‐resurfacing prosthesis, where BMD increase was widespread across the metaphysis (p < 0.001). DXA RFA provides high‐resolution insights into the effect of prosthesis design on the local strain environment in bone. © 2017 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 35:2203–2210, 2017. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-13 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5655934/ /pubmed/28169450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.23536 Text en © 2017 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Farzi, Mohsen Morris, Richard M. Penny, Jeannette Yang, Lang Pozo, Jose M. Overgaard, Søren Frangi, Alejandro F. Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) |
title | Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) |
title_full | Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) |
title_fullStr | Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) |
title_short | Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) |
title_sort | quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (dxa‐rfa) |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.23536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farzimohsen quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT morrisrichardm quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT pennyjeannette quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT yanglang quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT pozojosem quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT overgaardsøren quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT frangialejandrof quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa AT wilkinsonjeremymark quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa |