Cargando…

Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)

Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard method used to study bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the subtle, spatially complex changes in bone mass due to strain‐adaptive bone remodeling relevant to different prosthesis designs are not rea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farzi, Mohsen, Morris, Richard M., Penny, Jeannette, Yang, Lang, Pozo, Jose M., Overgaard, Søren, Frangi, Alejandro F., Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.23536
_version_ 1783273632057786368
author Farzi, Mohsen
Morris, Richard M.
Penny, Jeannette
Yang, Lang
Pozo, Jose M.
Overgaard, Søren
Frangi, Alejandro F.
Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark
author_facet Farzi, Mohsen
Morris, Richard M.
Penny, Jeannette
Yang, Lang
Pozo, Jose M.
Overgaard, Søren
Frangi, Alejandro F.
Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark
author_sort Farzi, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard method used to study bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the subtle, spatially complex changes in bone mass due to strain‐adaptive bone remodeling relevant to different prosthesis designs are not readily resolved using conventional DXA analysis. DXA region free analysis (DXA RFA) is a novel computational image analysis technique that provides a high‐resolution quantitation of periprosthetic BMD. Here, we applied the technique to quantitate the magnitude and areal size of periprosthetic BMD changes using scans acquired during two previous randomized clinical trials (2004 to 2009); one comparing three cemented prosthesis design geometries, and the other comparing a hip resurfacing versus a conventional cementless prosthesis. DXA RFA resolved subtle differences in magnitude and area of bone remodeling between prosthesis designs not previously identified in conventional DXA analyses. A mean bone loss of 10.3%, 12.1%, and 11.1% occurred for the three cemented prostheses within a bone area fraction of 14.8%, 14.4%, and 6.2%, mostly within the lesser trochanter (p < 0.001). For the cementless prosthesis, a diffuse pattern of bone loss (−14.3%) was observed at the shaft of femur in a small area fraction of 0.6% versus no significant bone loss for the hip resurfacing prosthesis (p < 0.001). BMD increases were observed consistently at the greater trochanter for all prostheses except the hip‐resurfacing prosthesis, where BMD increase was widespread across the metaphysis (p < 0.001). DXA RFA provides high‐resolution insights into the effect of prosthesis design on the local strain environment in bone. © 2017 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 35:2203–2210, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5655934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56559342017-11-01 Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA) Farzi, Mohsen Morris, Richard M. Penny, Jeannette Yang, Lang Pozo, Jose M. Overgaard, Søren Frangi, Alejandro F. Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark J Orthop Res Research Articles Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard method used to study bone mineral density (BMD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the subtle, spatially complex changes in bone mass due to strain‐adaptive bone remodeling relevant to different prosthesis designs are not readily resolved using conventional DXA analysis. DXA region free analysis (DXA RFA) is a novel computational image analysis technique that provides a high‐resolution quantitation of periprosthetic BMD. Here, we applied the technique to quantitate the magnitude and areal size of periprosthetic BMD changes using scans acquired during two previous randomized clinical trials (2004 to 2009); one comparing three cemented prosthesis design geometries, and the other comparing a hip resurfacing versus a conventional cementless prosthesis. DXA RFA resolved subtle differences in magnitude and area of bone remodeling between prosthesis designs not previously identified in conventional DXA analyses. A mean bone loss of 10.3%, 12.1%, and 11.1% occurred for the three cemented prostheses within a bone area fraction of 14.8%, 14.4%, and 6.2%, mostly within the lesser trochanter (p < 0.001). For the cementless prosthesis, a diffuse pattern of bone loss (−14.3%) was observed at the shaft of femur in a small area fraction of 0.6% versus no significant bone loss for the hip resurfacing prosthesis (p < 0.001). BMD increases were observed consistently at the greater trochanter for all prostheses except the hip‐resurfacing prosthesis, where BMD increase was widespread across the metaphysis (p < 0.001). DXA RFA provides high‐resolution insights into the effect of prosthesis design on the local strain environment in bone. © 2017 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 35:2203–2210, 2017. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-13 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5655934/ /pubmed/28169450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.23536 Text en © 2017 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Farzi, Mohsen
Morris, Richard M.
Penny, Jeannette
Yang, Lang
Pozo, Jose M.
Overgaard, Søren
Frangi, Alejandro F.
Wilkinson, Jeremy Mark
Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
title Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
title_full Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
title_fullStr Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
title_full_unstemmed Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
title_short Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (DXA‐RFA)
title_sort quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high‐resolution region‐free densitometric analysis (dxa‐rfa)
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.23536
work_keys_str_mv AT farzimohsen quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT morrisrichardm quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT pennyjeannette quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT yanglang quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT pozojosem quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT overgaardsøren quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT frangialejandrof quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa
AT wilkinsonjeremymark quantitatingtheeffectofprosthesisdesignonfemoralremodelingusinghighresolutionregionfreedensitometricanalysisdxarfa