Cargando…

Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report

BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is a popular form of long-acting reversible contraception. Although generally safe, one of the most serious complications of intrauterine device use is uterine perforation. Risk factors for perforation include position of the uterus, force exerted during intrauter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neumann, Dana A., Graversen, Joseph A., Pugh, Suzanne K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29065904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1480-3
_version_ 1783273635634479104
author Neumann, Dana A.
Graversen, Joseph A.
Pugh, Suzanne K.
author_facet Neumann, Dana A.
Graversen, Joseph A.
Pugh, Suzanne K.
author_sort Neumann, Dana A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is a popular form of long-acting reversible contraception. Although generally safe, one of the most serious complications of intrauterine device use is uterine perforation. Risk factors for perforation include position of the uterus, force exerted during intrauterine device insertion, postpartum period, and breastfeeding. This case is important and needs to be reported because it highlights the need to assess risk factors for uterine perforation. It adds to the medical literature because it examines the relationship between position of the uterus and the location of uterine perforation. This case report is unusual in that it describes the mechanism and specific location of uterine perforation in relation to the position of the uterus. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an intrauterine device found in the omentum of a 30-year-old white postpartum woman with a significantly retroverted uterus after the intrauterine device threads were not visualized on speculum examination during a 6-week placement check. The intrauterine device was located and removed via laparoscopy without complication. CONCLUSIONS: This case report will be of interest to women’s health practitioners because it illustrates the importance of identifying patients with risk factors for uterine perforation, examining the relationship between uterine position and location of perforation. This is especially significant because the true incidence of perforation may be higher than the numbers reported in the literature. There is no specific diagnostic code for uterine perforation and it is unlikely that retrospective studies can accurately identify all cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5655949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56559492017-10-31 Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report Neumann, Dana A. Graversen, Joseph A. Pugh, Suzanne K. J Med Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is a popular form of long-acting reversible contraception. Although generally safe, one of the most serious complications of intrauterine device use is uterine perforation. Risk factors for perforation include position of the uterus, force exerted during intrauterine device insertion, postpartum period, and breastfeeding. This case is important and needs to be reported because it highlights the need to assess risk factors for uterine perforation. It adds to the medical literature because it examines the relationship between position of the uterus and the location of uterine perforation. This case report is unusual in that it describes the mechanism and specific location of uterine perforation in relation to the position of the uterus. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an intrauterine device found in the omentum of a 30-year-old white postpartum woman with a significantly retroverted uterus after the intrauterine device threads were not visualized on speculum examination during a 6-week placement check. The intrauterine device was located and removed via laparoscopy without complication. CONCLUSIONS: This case report will be of interest to women’s health practitioners because it illustrates the importance of identifying patients with risk factors for uterine perforation, examining the relationship between uterine position and location of perforation. This is especially significant because the true incidence of perforation may be higher than the numbers reported in the literature. There is no specific diagnostic code for uterine perforation and it is unlikely that retrospective studies can accurately identify all cases. BioMed Central 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5655949/ /pubmed/29065904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1480-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Neumann, Dana A.
Graversen, Joseph A.
Pugh, Suzanne K.
Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
title Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
title_full Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
title_fullStr Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
title_short Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
title_sort intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29065904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1480-3
work_keys_str_mv AT neumanndanaa intrauterinedeviceembeddedinomentumofpostpartumpatientwithamarkedlyretroverteduterusacasereport
AT graversenjosepha intrauterinedeviceembeddedinomentumofpostpartumpatientwithamarkedlyretroverteduterusacasereport
AT pughsuzannek intrauterinedeviceembeddedinomentumofpostpartumpatientwithamarkedlyretroverteduterusacasereport