Cargando…

Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios

We explored the performance of structure-based computational analysis in four neurodegenerative conditions [Ataxia (AT, n = 16), Huntington's Disease (HD, n = 52), Alzheimer's Disease (AD, n = 66), and Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA, n = 50)], all characterized by brain atrophy. The inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faria, Andreia V., Liang, Zifei, Miller, Michael I., Mori, Susumu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00578
_version_ 1783273640317419520
author Faria, Andreia V.
Liang, Zifei
Miller, Michael I.
Mori, Susumu
author_facet Faria, Andreia V.
Liang, Zifei
Miller, Michael I.
Mori, Susumu
author_sort Faria, Andreia V.
collection PubMed
description We explored the performance of structure-based computational analysis in four neurodegenerative conditions [Ataxia (AT, n = 16), Huntington's Disease (HD, n = 52), Alzheimer's Disease (AD, n = 66), and Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA, n = 50)], all characterized by brain atrophy. The independent variables were the volumes of 283 anatomical areas, derived from automated segmentation of T1-high resolution brain MRIs. The segmentation based volumetric quantification reduces image dimensionality from the voxel level [on the order of [Formula: see text] (10(6))] to anatomical structures [[Formula: see text] (10(2))] for subsequent statistical analysis. We evaluated the effectiveness of this approach on extracting anatomical features, already described by human experience and a priori biological knowledge, in specific scenarios: (1) when pathologies were relatively homogeneous, with evident image alterations (e.g., AT); (2) when the time course was highly correlated with the anatomical changes (e.g., HD), an analogy for prediction; (3) when the pathology embraced heterogeneous phenotypes (e.g., AD) so the classification was less efficient but, in compensation, anatomical and clinical information were less redundant; and (4) when the entity was composed of multiple subgroups that had some degree of anatomical representation (e.g., PPA), showing the potential of this method for the clustering of more homogeneous phenotypes that can be of clinical importance. Using the structure-based quantification and simple linear classifiers (partial least square), we achieve 87.5 and 73% of accuracy on differentiating AT and pre-symptomatic HD patents from controls, respectively. More importantly, the anatomical features automatically revealed by the classifiers agreed with the patterns previously described on these pathologies. The accuracy was lower (68%) on differentiating AD from controls, as AD does not display a clear anatomical phenotype. On the other hand, the method identified PPA clinical phenotypes and their respective anatomical signatures. Although most of the data are presented here as proof of concept in simulated clinical scenarios, structure-based analysis was potentially effective in characterizing phenotypes, retrieving relevant anatomical features, predicting prognosis, and aiding diagnosis, with the advantage of being easily translatable to clinics and understandable biologically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5655969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56559692017-11-03 Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios Faria, Andreia V. Liang, Zifei Miller, Michael I. Mori, Susumu Front Neurosci Neuroscience We explored the performance of structure-based computational analysis in four neurodegenerative conditions [Ataxia (AT, n = 16), Huntington's Disease (HD, n = 52), Alzheimer's Disease (AD, n = 66), and Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA, n = 50)], all characterized by brain atrophy. The independent variables were the volumes of 283 anatomical areas, derived from automated segmentation of T1-high resolution brain MRIs. The segmentation based volumetric quantification reduces image dimensionality from the voxel level [on the order of [Formula: see text] (10(6))] to anatomical structures [[Formula: see text] (10(2))] for subsequent statistical analysis. We evaluated the effectiveness of this approach on extracting anatomical features, already described by human experience and a priori biological knowledge, in specific scenarios: (1) when pathologies were relatively homogeneous, with evident image alterations (e.g., AT); (2) when the time course was highly correlated with the anatomical changes (e.g., HD), an analogy for prediction; (3) when the pathology embraced heterogeneous phenotypes (e.g., AD) so the classification was less efficient but, in compensation, anatomical and clinical information were less redundant; and (4) when the entity was composed of multiple subgroups that had some degree of anatomical representation (e.g., PPA), showing the potential of this method for the clustering of more homogeneous phenotypes that can be of clinical importance. Using the structure-based quantification and simple linear classifiers (partial least square), we achieve 87.5 and 73% of accuracy on differentiating AT and pre-symptomatic HD patents from controls, respectively. More importantly, the anatomical features automatically revealed by the classifiers agreed with the patterns previously described on these pathologies. The accuracy was lower (68%) on differentiating AD from controls, as AD does not display a clear anatomical phenotype. On the other hand, the method identified PPA clinical phenotypes and their respective anatomical signatures. Although most of the data are presented here as proof of concept in simulated clinical scenarios, structure-based analysis was potentially effective in characterizing phenotypes, retrieving relevant anatomical features, predicting prognosis, and aiding diagnosis, with the advantage of being easily translatable to clinics and understandable biologically. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5655969/ /pubmed/29104527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00578 Text en Copyright © 2017 Faria, Liang, Miller and Mori. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Faria, Andreia V.
Liang, Zifei
Miller, Michael I.
Mori, Susumu
Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios
title Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios
title_full Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios
title_fullStr Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios
title_short Brain MRI Pattern Recognition Translated to Clinical Scenarios
title_sort brain mri pattern recognition translated to clinical scenarios
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5655969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00578
work_keys_str_mv AT fariaandreiav brainmripatternrecognitiontranslatedtoclinicalscenarios
AT liangzifei brainmripatternrecognitiontranslatedtoclinicalscenarios
AT millermichaeli brainmripatternrecognitiontranslatedtoclinicalscenarios
AT morisusumu brainmripatternrecognitiontranslatedtoclinicalscenarios