Cargando…

Can diffusion-weighted imaging add information in the evaluation of breast lesions considered suspicious on magnetic resonance imaging?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of breast lesions classified as suspicious on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), correlating the findings with the results of the histological analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guatelli, Camila Souza, Bitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira, Osório, Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo, Graziano, Luciana, de Castro, Alessandra Araújo, de Souza, Juliana Alves, Marques, Elvira Ferreira, Chojniak, Rubens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29085162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0089
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of breast lesions classified as suspicious on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), correlating the findings with the results of the histological analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study based on a review of the medical records of 215 patients who were submitted to MRI with DWI before undergoing biopsy at a cancer center. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for each lesion, and the result of the histological analysis was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean age was 49 years. We identified 252 lesions, 161 (63.9%) of which were found to be malignant in the histological analysis. The mean ADC value was higher for the benign lesions than for the malignant lesions (1.50 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s vs. 0.97 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s), the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). The ADC cut-off point with the greatest sensitivity and specificity on the receiver operating characteristic curve was 1.03 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s. When the DWI and conventional MRI findings were combined, the accuracy reached 95.9%, with a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 96.4%. CONCLUSION: The use of DWI could facilitate the characterization of breast lesions, especially those classified as BI-RADS 4, increasing the specificity and diagnostic accuracy of MRI.