Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting

INTRODUCTION: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received ≥ 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mudad, Raja, Patel, Manish B, Margunato-Debay, Sandra, Garofalo, David, Lal, Lincy S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29089791
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S139647
_version_ 1783273689271238656
author Mudad, Raja
Patel, Manish B
Margunato-Debay, Sandra
Garofalo, David
Lal, Lincy S
author_facet Mudad, Raja
Patel, Manish B
Margunato-Debay, Sandra
Garofalo, David
Lal, Lincy S
author_sort Mudad, Raja
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus platinum were identified from the Navigating Cancer database. Clinical effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Other endpoints included safety and utilization of supportive care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 193 patients were included (nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin, n = 61; gemcitabine plus platinum, n = 132). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the cohorts. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin had a significantly longer OS than those receiving gemcitabine plus carboplatin (median, 12.8 vs 9.0 months; P = 0.03). However, the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99–2.42; P = 0.06). nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-treated patients had significantly longer TTD than gemcitabine plus carboplatin-treated patients (median, 4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = 0.03; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.90; P = 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 anemia and neutropenia were significantly lower in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Nausea and neuropathy (grade not specified) were significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin than the gemcitabine plus carboplatin group. No differences in supportive care use were observed between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell NSCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5656340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56563402017-10-31 Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting Mudad, Raja Patel, Manish B Margunato-Debay, Sandra Garofalo, David Lal, Lincy S Lung Cancer (Auckl) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Real-world comparative effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus platinum were analyzed in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus platinum were identified from the Navigating Cancer database. Clinical effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Other endpoints included safety and utilization of supportive care. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for potential confounding effects of baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 193 patients were included (nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin, n = 61; gemcitabine plus platinum, n = 132). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the cohorts. Patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin had a significantly longer OS than those receiving gemcitabine plus carboplatin (median, 12.8 vs 9.0 months; P = 0.03). However, the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99–2.42; P = 0.06). nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-treated patients had significantly longer TTD than gemcitabine plus carboplatin-treated patients (median, 4.3 vs 3.5 months; P = 0.03; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.90; P = 0.04). Grade 3 or 4 anemia and neutropenia were significantly lower in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Nausea and neuropathy (grade not specified) were significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin than the gemcitabine plus carboplatin group. No differences in supportive care use were observed between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell NSCLC. Dove Medical Press 2017-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5656340/ /pubmed/29089791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S139647 Text en © 2017 Mudad et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mudad, Raja
Patel, Manish B
Margunato-Debay, Sandra
Garofalo, David
Lal, Lincy S
Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_full Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_short Comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a US community oncology setting
title_sort comparative effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer in a us community oncology setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29089791
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S139647
work_keys_str_mv AT mudadraja comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT patelmanishb comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT margunatodebaysandra comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT garofalodavid comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting
AT lallincys comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnabpaclitaxelpluscarboplatinvsgemcitabinepluscarboplatininfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedsquamouscellnonsmallcelllungcancerinauscommunityoncologysetting