Cargando…
Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS
BACKGROUND: We assessed the potential of risk stratification of ARDS patients using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at ARDS onset and after 24 h. METHODS: We used data from a prospective observational study in patients admitted to a mixed medical–surgical intensive care uni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0327-9 |
_version_ | 1783273711679307776 |
---|---|
author | Pisani, Luigi Roozeman, Jan-Paul Simonis, Fabienne D. Giangregorio, Antonio van der Hoeven, Sophia M. Schouten, Laura R. Horn, Janneke Neto, Ary Serpa Festic, Emir Dondorp, Arjen M. Grasso, Salvatore Bos, Lieuwe D. Schultz, Marcus J. |
author_facet | Pisani, Luigi Roozeman, Jan-Paul Simonis, Fabienne D. Giangregorio, Antonio van der Hoeven, Sophia M. Schouten, Laura R. Horn, Janneke Neto, Ary Serpa Festic, Emir Dondorp, Arjen M. Grasso, Salvatore Bos, Lieuwe D. Schultz, Marcus J. |
author_sort | Pisani, Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We assessed the potential of risk stratification of ARDS patients using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at ARDS onset and after 24 h. METHODS: We used data from a prospective observational study in patients admitted to a mixed medical–surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Risk stratification was by cutoffs for SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Patients with moderate or severe ARDS with a length of stay of > 24 h were included in this study. Patients were assigned to four predefined risk groups: group I (SpO(2)/FiO(2) ≥ 190 and PEEP < 10 cm H(2)O), group II (SpO(2)/FiO(2) ≥ 190 and PEEP ≥ 10 cm), group III (SpO(2)/FiO(2) < 190 and PEEP < 10 cm H(2)O) and group IV (SpO(2)/FiO(2) < 190 and PEEP ≥ 10 cm H(2)O). RESULTS: The analysis included 456 patients. SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PaO(2)/FiO(2) had a strong relationship (P < 0.001, R (2) = 0.676) that could be described in a linear regression equation (SpO(2)/FiO(2) = 42.6 + 1.0 * PaO(2)/FiO(2)). Risk stratification at initial ARDS diagnosis resulted in groups that had no differences in in-hospital mortality. Risk stratification at 24 h resulted in groups with increasing mortality rates. The association between group assignment at 24 h and outcome was confounded by several factors, including APACHE IV scores, arterial pH and plasma lactate levels, and vasopressor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with moderate or severe ARDS, SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PaO(2)/FiO(2) have a strong linear relationship. In contrast to risk stratification at initial ARDS diagnosis, risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP after 24 h resulted in groups with worsening outcomes. Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP could be practical, especially in resource-limited settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0327-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5656507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56565072017-11-06 Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS Pisani, Luigi Roozeman, Jan-Paul Simonis, Fabienne D. Giangregorio, Antonio van der Hoeven, Sophia M. Schouten, Laura R. Horn, Janneke Neto, Ary Serpa Festic, Emir Dondorp, Arjen M. Grasso, Salvatore Bos, Lieuwe D. Schultz, Marcus J. Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: We assessed the potential of risk stratification of ARDS patients using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at ARDS onset and after 24 h. METHODS: We used data from a prospective observational study in patients admitted to a mixed medical–surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Risk stratification was by cutoffs for SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Patients with moderate or severe ARDS with a length of stay of > 24 h were included in this study. Patients were assigned to four predefined risk groups: group I (SpO(2)/FiO(2) ≥ 190 and PEEP < 10 cm H(2)O), group II (SpO(2)/FiO(2) ≥ 190 and PEEP ≥ 10 cm), group III (SpO(2)/FiO(2) < 190 and PEEP < 10 cm H(2)O) and group IV (SpO(2)/FiO(2) < 190 and PEEP ≥ 10 cm H(2)O). RESULTS: The analysis included 456 patients. SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PaO(2)/FiO(2) had a strong relationship (P < 0.001, R (2) = 0.676) that could be described in a linear regression equation (SpO(2)/FiO(2) = 42.6 + 1.0 * PaO(2)/FiO(2)). Risk stratification at initial ARDS diagnosis resulted in groups that had no differences in in-hospital mortality. Risk stratification at 24 h resulted in groups with increasing mortality rates. The association between group assignment at 24 h and outcome was confounded by several factors, including APACHE IV scores, arterial pH and plasma lactate levels, and vasopressor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with moderate or severe ARDS, SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PaO(2)/FiO(2) have a strong linear relationship. In contrast to risk stratification at initial ARDS diagnosis, risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP after 24 h resulted in groups with worsening outcomes. Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP could be practical, especially in resource-limited settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0327-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5656507/ /pubmed/29071429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0327-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Pisani, Luigi Roozeman, Jan-Paul Simonis, Fabienne D. Giangregorio, Antonio van der Hoeven, Sophia M. Schouten, Laura R. Horn, Janneke Neto, Ary Serpa Festic, Emir Dondorp, Arjen M. Grasso, Salvatore Bos, Lieuwe D. Schultz, Marcus J. Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS |
title | Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS |
title_full | Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS |
title_fullStr | Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS |
title_short | Risk stratification using SpO(2)/FiO(2) and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ARDS |
title_sort | risk stratification using spo(2)/fio(2) and peep at initial ards diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe ards |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29071429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0327-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pisaniluigi riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT roozemanjanpaul riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT simonisfabienned riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT giangregorioantonio riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT vanderhoevensophiam riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT schoutenlaurar riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT hornjanneke riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT netoaryserpa riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT festicemir riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT dondorparjenm riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT grassosalvatore riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT boslieuwed riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT schultzmarcusj riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards AT riskstratificationusingspo2fio2andpeepatinitialardsdiagnosisandafter24hinpatientswithmoderateorsevereards |