Cargando…

A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high management costs, particularly in recurrent cases. Fidaxomicin treatment results in lower recurrence rates than vancomycin and metronidazole, but has higher acquisition costs in Europe and the USA. This systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burton, Hannah E., Mitchell, Stephen A., Watt, Maureen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0540-2
_version_ 1783273750627614720
author Burton, Hannah E.
Mitchell, Stephen A.
Watt, Maureen
author_facet Burton, Hannah E.
Mitchell, Stephen A.
Watt, Maureen
author_sort Burton, Hannah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high management costs, particularly in recurrent cases. Fidaxomicin treatment results in lower recurrence rates than vancomycin and metronidazole, but has higher acquisition costs in Europe and the USA. This systematic literature review summarises economic evaluations (EEs) of fidaxomicin, vancomycin and metronidazole for treatment of CDI. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE(®), Embase, Cochrane Library) and conference proceedings (ISPOR, ECCMID, ICAAC and IDWeek) were searched for publications reporting EEs of fidaxomicin, vancomycin and/or metronidazole in the treatment of CDI. Reference bibliographies of identified manuscripts were also reviewed. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated according to the overall population of patients with CDI, as well as in subgroups with severe CDI or recurrent CDI, or those at higher risk of recurrence or mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 27 relevant EEs, conducted from the perspective of 12 different countries, were identified. Fidaxomicin was cost-effective versus vancomycin and/or metronidazole in 14 of 24 EEs (58.3%), vancomycin was cost-effective versus fidaxomicin and/or metronidazole in five of 27 EEs (18.5%) and metronidazole was cost-effective versus fidaxomicin and/or vancomycin in two of 13 EEs (15.4%). Fidaxomicin was cost-effective versus vancomycin in most of the EEs evaluating specific patient subgroups. Key cost-effectiveness drivers were cure rate, recurrence rate, time horizon, drug costs and length and cost of hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: In most EEs, fidaxomicin was demonstrated to be cost-effective versus metronidazole and vancomycin in patients with CDI. These results have relevance to clinical practice, given the high budgetary impact of managing CDI and increasing restrictions on healthcare budgets. OTHER: This analysis was initiated and funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0540-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5656734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56567342017-11-01 A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection Burton, Hannah E. Mitchell, Stephen A. Watt, Maureen Pharmacoeconomics Systematic Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high management costs, particularly in recurrent cases. Fidaxomicin treatment results in lower recurrence rates than vancomycin and metronidazole, but has higher acquisition costs in Europe and the USA. This systematic literature review summarises economic evaluations (EEs) of fidaxomicin, vancomycin and metronidazole for treatment of CDI. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE(®), Embase, Cochrane Library) and conference proceedings (ISPOR, ECCMID, ICAAC and IDWeek) were searched for publications reporting EEs of fidaxomicin, vancomycin and/or metronidazole in the treatment of CDI. Reference bibliographies of identified manuscripts were also reviewed. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated according to the overall population of patients with CDI, as well as in subgroups with severe CDI or recurrent CDI, or those at higher risk of recurrence or mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 27 relevant EEs, conducted from the perspective of 12 different countries, were identified. Fidaxomicin was cost-effective versus vancomycin and/or metronidazole in 14 of 24 EEs (58.3%), vancomycin was cost-effective versus fidaxomicin and/or metronidazole in five of 27 EEs (18.5%) and metronidazole was cost-effective versus fidaxomicin and/or vancomycin in two of 13 EEs (15.4%). Fidaxomicin was cost-effective versus vancomycin in most of the EEs evaluating specific patient subgroups. Key cost-effectiveness drivers were cure rate, recurrence rate, time horizon, drug costs and length and cost of hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: In most EEs, fidaxomicin was demonstrated to be cost-effective versus metronidazole and vancomycin in patients with CDI. These results have relevance to clinical practice, given the high budgetary impact of managing CDI and increasing restrictions on healthcare budgets. OTHER: This analysis was initiated and funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0540-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-05 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5656734/ /pubmed/28875314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0540-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Burton, Hannah E.
Mitchell, Stephen A.
Watt, Maureen
A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection
title A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection
title_full A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection
title_fullStr A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection
title_short A Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Antibiotic Treatments for Clostridium difficile Infection
title_sort systematic literature review of economic evaluations of antibiotic treatments for clostridium difficile infection
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5656734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0540-2
work_keys_str_mv AT burtonhannahe asystematicliteraturereviewofeconomicevaluationsofantibiotictreatmentsforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT mitchellstephena asystematicliteraturereviewofeconomicevaluationsofantibiotictreatmentsforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT wattmaureen asystematicliteraturereviewofeconomicevaluationsofantibiotictreatmentsforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT burtonhannahe systematicliteraturereviewofeconomicevaluationsofantibiotictreatmentsforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT mitchellstephena systematicliteraturereviewofeconomicevaluationsofantibiotictreatmentsforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT wattmaureen systematicliteraturereviewofeconomicevaluationsofantibiotictreatmentsforclostridiumdifficileinfection