Cargando…
Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
BACKGROUND: The ExoMars 2016 mission, consisting of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Schiaparelli lander, was launched on March 14 2016 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and reached its destination in October 2016. The Schiaparelli lander was subject to strict requirements for microbial cleanliness according t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3 |
_version_ | 1783273811668369408 |
---|---|
author | Koskinen, Kaisa Rettberg, Petra Pukall, Rüdiger Auerbach, Anna Wink, Lisa Barczyk, Simon Perras, Alexandra Mahnert, Alexander Margheritis, Diana Kminek, Gerhard Moissl-Eichinger, Christine |
author_facet | Koskinen, Kaisa Rettberg, Petra Pukall, Rüdiger Auerbach, Anna Wink, Lisa Barczyk, Simon Perras, Alexandra Mahnert, Alexander Margheritis, Diana Kminek, Gerhard Moissl-Eichinger, Christine |
author_sort | Koskinen, Kaisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The ExoMars 2016 mission, consisting of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Schiaparelli lander, was launched on March 14 2016 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and reached its destination in October 2016. The Schiaparelli lander was subject to strict requirements for microbial cleanliness according to the obligatory planetary protection policy. To reach the required cleanliness, the ExoMars 2016 flight hardware was assembled in a newly built, biocontrolled cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin, Italy. In this study, we performed microbiological surveys of the cleanroom facilities and the spacecraft hardware before and during the assembly, integration and testing (AIT) activities. METHODS: Besides the European Space Agency (ESA) standard bioburden assay, that served as a proxy for the microbiological contamination in general, we performed various alternative cultivation assays and utilised molecular techniques, including quantitative PCR and next generation sequencing, to assess the absolute and relative abundance and broadest diversity of microorganisms and their signatures in the cleanroom and on the spacecraft hardware. RESULTS: Our results show that the bioburden, detected microbial contamination and microbial diversity decreased continuously after the cleanroom was decontaminated with more effective cleaning agents and during the ongoing AIT. The studied cleanrooms and change room were occupied by very distinct microbial communities: Overall, the change room harboured a higher number and diversity of microorganisms, including Propionibacterium, which was found to be significantly increased in the change room. In particular, the so called alternative cultivation assays proved important in detecting a broader cultivable diversity than covered by the standard bioburden assay and thus completed the picture on the cleanroom microbiota. CONCLUSION: During the whole project, the bioburden stayed at acceptable level and did not raise any concern for the ExoMars 2016 mission. The cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin is an excellent example of how efficient microbiological control is performed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5657055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56570552017-10-31 Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission Koskinen, Kaisa Rettberg, Petra Pukall, Rüdiger Auerbach, Anna Wink, Lisa Barczyk, Simon Perras, Alexandra Mahnert, Alexander Margheritis, Diana Kminek, Gerhard Moissl-Eichinger, Christine Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: The ExoMars 2016 mission, consisting of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Schiaparelli lander, was launched on March 14 2016 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and reached its destination in October 2016. The Schiaparelli lander was subject to strict requirements for microbial cleanliness according to the obligatory planetary protection policy. To reach the required cleanliness, the ExoMars 2016 flight hardware was assembled in a newly built, biocontrolled cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin, Italy. In this study, we performed microbiological surveys of the cleanroom facilities and the spacecraft hardware before and during the assembly, integration and testing (AIT) activities. METHODS: Besides the European Space Agency (ESA) standard bioburden assay, that served as a proxy for the microbiological contamination in general, we performed various alternative cultivation assays and utilised molecular techniques, including quantitative PCR and next generation sequencing, to assess the absolute and relative abundance and broadest diversity of microorganisms and their signatures in the cleanroom and on the spacecraft hardware. RESULTS: Our results show that the bioburden, detected microbial contamination and microbial diversity decreased continuously after the cleanroom was decontaminated with more effective cleaning agents and during the ongoing AIT. The studied cleanrooms and change room were occupied by very distinct microbial communities: Overall, the change room harboured a higher number and diversity of microorganisms, including Propionibacterium, which was found to be significantly increased in the change room. In particular, the so called alternative cultivation assays proved important in detecting a broader cultivable diversity than covered by the standard bioburden assay and thus completed the picture on the cleanroom microbiota. CONCLUSION: During the whole project, the bioburden stayed at acceptable level and did not raise any concern for the ExoMars 2016 mission. The cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin is an excellent example of how efficient microbiological control is performed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5657055/ /pubmed/29070062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Koskinen, Kaisa Rettberg, Petra Pukall, Rüdiger Auerbach, Anna Wink, Lisa Barczyk, Simon Perras, Alexandra Mahnert, Alexander Margheritis, Diana Kminek, Gerhard Moissl-Eichinger, Christine Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission |
title | Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission |
title_full | Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission |
title_fullStr | Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission |
title_short | Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission |
title_sort | microbial biodiversity assessment of the european space agency’s exomars 2016 mission |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koskinenkaisa microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT rettbergpetra microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT pukallrudiger microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT auerbachanna microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT winklisa microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT barczyksimon microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT perrasalexandra microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT mahnertalexander microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT margheritisdiana microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT kminekgerhard microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission AT moissleichingerchristine microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission |