Cargando…

Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission

BACKGROUND: The ExoMars 2016 mission, consisting of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Schiaparelli lander, was launched on March 14 2016 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and reached its destination in October 2016. The Schiaparelli lander was subject to strict requirements for microbial cleanliness according t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koskinen, Kaisa, Rettberg, Petra, Pukall, Rüdiger, Auerbach, Anna, Wink, Lisa, Barczyk, Simon, Perras, Alexandra, Mahnert, Alexander, Margheritis, Diana, Kminek, Gerhard, Moissl-Eichinger, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3
_version_ 1783273811668369408
author Koskinen, Kaisa
Rettberg, Petra
Pukall, Rüdiger
Auerbach, Anna
Wink, Lisa
Barczyk, Simon
Perras, Alexandra
Mahnert, Alexander
Margheritis, Diana
Kminek, Gerhard
Moissl-Eichinger, Christine
author_facet Koskinen, Kaisa
Rettberg, Petra
Pukall, Rüdiger
Auerbach, Anna
Wink, Lisa
Barczyk, Simon
Perras, Alexandra
Mahnert, Alexander
Margheritis, Diana
Kminek, Gerhard
Moissl-Eichinger, Christine
author_sort Koskinen, Kaisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ExoMars 2016 mission, consisting of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Schiaparelli lander, was launched on March 14 2016 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and reached its destination in October 2016. The Schiaparelli lander was subject to strict requirements for microbial cleanliness according to the obligatory planetary protection policy. To reach the required cleanliness, the ExoMars 2016 flight hardware was assembled in a newly built, biocontrolled cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin, Italy. In this study, we performed microbiological surveys of the cleanroom facilities and the spacecraft hardware before and during the assembly, integration and testing (AIT) activities. METHODS: Besides the European Space Agency (ESA) standard bioburden assay, that served as a proxy for the microbiological contamination in general, we performed various alternative cultivation assays and utilised molecular techniques, including quantitative PCR and next generation sequencing, to assess the absolute and relative abundance and broadest diversity of microorganisms and their signatures in the cleanroom and on the spacecraft hardware. RESULTS: Our results show that the bioburden, detected microbial contamination and microbial diversity decreased continuously after the cleanroom was decontaminated with more effective cleaning agents and during the ongoing AIT. The studied cleanrooms and change room were occupied by very distinct microbial communities: Overall, the change room harboured a higher number and diversity of microorganisms, including Propionibacterium, which was found to be significantly increased in the change room. In particular, the so called alternative cultivation assays proved important in detecting a broader cultivable diversity than covered by the standard bioburden assay and thus completed the picture on the cleanroom microbiota. CONCLUSION: During the whole project, the bioburden stayed at acceptable level and did not raise any concern for the ExoMars 2016 mission. The cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin is an excellent example of how efficient microbiological control is performed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5657055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56570552017-10-31 Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission Koskinen, Kaisa Rettberg, Petra Pukall, Rüdiger Auerbach, Anna Wink, Lisa Barczyk, Simon Perras, Alexandra Mahnert, Alexander Margheritis, Diana Kminek, Gerhard Moissl-Eichinger, Christine Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: The ExoMars 2016 mission, consisting of the Trace Gas Orbiter and the Schiaparelli lander, was launched on March 14 2016 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan and reached its destination in October 2016. The Schiaparelli lander was subject to strict requirements for microbial cleanliness according to the obligatory planetary protection policy. To reach the required cleanliness, the ExoMars 2016 flight hardware was assembled in a newly built, biocontrolled cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin, Italy. In this study, we performed microbiological surveys of the cleanroom facilities and the spacecraft hardware before and during the assembly, integration and testing (AIT) activities. METHODS: Besides the European Space Agency (ESA) standard bioburden assay, that served as a proxy for the microbiological contamination in general, we performed various alternative cultivation assays and utilised molecular techniques, including quantitative PCR and next generation sequencing, to assess the absolute and relative abundance and broadest diversity of microorganisms and their signatures in the cleanroom and on the spacecraft hardware. RESULTS: Our results show that the bioburden, detected microbial contamination and microbial diversity decreased continuously after the cleanroom was decontaminated with more effective cleaning agents and during the ongoing AIT. The studied cleanrooms and change room were occupied by very distinct microbial communities: Overall, the change room harboured a higher number and diversity of microorganisms, including Propionibacterium, which was found to be significantly increased in the change room. In particular, the so called alternative cultivation assays proved important in detecting a broader cultivable diversity than covered by the standard bioburden assay and thus completed the picture on the cleanroom microbiota. CONCLUSION: During the whole project, the bioburden stayed at acceptable level and did not raise any concern for the ExoMars 2016 mission. The cleanroom complex at Thales Alenia Space in Turin is an excellent example of how efficient microbiological control is performed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5657055/ /pubmed/29070062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Koskinen, Kaisa
Rettberg, Petra
Pukall, Rüdiger
Auerbach, Anna
Wink, Lisa
Barczyk, Simon
Perras, Alexandra
Mahnert, Alexander
Margheritis, Diana
Kminek, Gerhard
Moissl-Eichinger, Christine
Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
title Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
title_full Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
title_fullStr Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
title_full_unstemmed Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
title_short Microbial biodiversity assessment of the European Space Agency’s ExoMars 2016 mission
title_sort microbial biodiversity assessment of the european space agency’s exomars 2016 mission
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0358-3
work_keys_str_mv AT koskinenkaisa microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT rettbergpetra microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT pukallrudiger microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT auerbachanna microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT winklisa microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT barczyksimon microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT perrasalexandra microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT mahnertalexander microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT margheritisdiana microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT kminekgerhard microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission
AT moissleichingerchristine microbialbiodiversityassessmentoftheeuropeanspaceagencysexomars2016mission