Cargando…

A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst

BACKGROUND: A popliteal cyst is a benign swelling with synovial fluid located behind the knee joint. Popliteal cysts are often asymptomatic; however, symptomatic cysts may cause pain and may need surgery interventions. Here, we performed a perspective study to compare the clinical efficacy of differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Bo, Wang, Fengchun, Lou, Yanhua, Li, Juan, Sun, Lei, Gao, Lei, Liu, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0659-z
_version_ 1783273816140546048
author Yang, Bo
Wang, Fengchun
Lou, Yanhua
Li, Juan
Sun, Lei
Gao, Lei
Liu, Feng
author_facet Yang, Bo
Wang, Fengchun
Lou, Yanhua
Li, Juan
Sun, Lei
Gao, Lei
Liu, Feng
author_sort Yang, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A popliteal cyst is a benign swelling with synovial fluid located behind the knee joint. Popliteal cysts are often asymptomatic; however, symptomatic cysts may cause pain and may need surgery interventions. Here, we performed a perspective study to compare the clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches, including traditional open excision and advanced arthroscopic treatment. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with popliteal cysts were assigned into three groups by a randomized complete block design. Group A included 32 patients (15 males and 17 females, age 55.3 ± 9.8 years) who received arthroscopic internal drainage of the cysts. Group B included 19 patients (9 males and 10 females, age 55.4 ± 7.6 years) who received open excision after arthroscopic treatment. Group C included 25 patients (11 males and 14 females, age 54.2 ± 8.5 years) who received open excision. All patients were followed up for an average of 13.7 ± 2.4 months. The following parameters were compared: the time of surgery, during surgery, the length of incision, the incision healing rate, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the hospitalization time, the rate of recovery to level 0–1 cysts, the recurrence rate, and the Lysholm score. RESULTS: Group A exhibited significant better outcomes compared to groups B and C in the length of incision (1.6 ± 0.1 cm), the incision healing rate (100%), the postoperative VAS score (2.7 ± 1.2), the hospitalization time (7.8 ± 2.8 days), and the Lysholm score at the last follow-up (85.8 ± 5.2). The recurrence rate is significantly lower in groups A (3.1%) and B (5.2%) than group C (40%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic treatment for popliteal cysts exhibited better clinical outcomes with minimal invasion and can be recommended for future clinical interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5657075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56570752017-10-31 A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst Yang, Bo Wang, Fengchun Lou, Yanhua Li, Juan Sun, Lei Gao, Lei Liu, Feng J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A popliteal cyst is a benign swelling with synovial fluid located behind the knee joint. Popliteal cysts are often asymptomatic; however, symptomatic cysts may cause pain and may need surgery interventions. Here, we performed a perspective study to compare the clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches, including traditional open excision and advanced arthroscopic treatment. METHODS: A total of 76 patients with popliteal cysts were assigned into three groups by a randomized complete block design. Group A included 32 patients (15 males and 17 females, age 55.3 ± 9.8 years) who received arthroscopic internal drainage of the cysts. Group B included 19 patients (9 males and 10 females, age 55.4 ± 7.6 years) who received open excision after arthroscopic treatment. Group C included 25 patients (11 males and 14 females, age 54.2 ± 8.5 years) who received open excision. All patients were followed up for an average of 13.7 ± 2.4 months. The following parameters were compared: the time of surgery, during surgery, the length of incision, the incision healing rate, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the hospitalization time, the rate of recovery to level 0–1 cysts, the recurrence rate, and the Lysholm score. RESULTS: Group A exhibited significant better outcomes compared to groups B and C in the length of incision (1.6 ± 0.1 cm), the incision healing rate (100%), the postoperative VAS score (2.7 ± 1.2), the hospitalization time (7.8 ± 2.8 days), and the Lysholm score at the last follow-up (85.8 ± 5.2). The recurrence rate is significantly lower in groups A (3.1%) and B (5.2%) than group C (40%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic treatment for popliteal cysts exhibited better clinical outcomes with minimal invasion and can be recommended for future clinical interventions. BioMed Central 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5657075/ /pubmed/29070055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0659-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Bo
Wang, Fengchun
Lou, Yanhua
Li, Juan
Sun, Lei
Gao, Lei
Liu, Feng
A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
title A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
title_full A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
title_fullStr A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
title_short A comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
title_sort comparison of clinical efficacy between different surgical approaches for popliteal cyst
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0659-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yangbo acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT wangfengchun acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT louyanhua acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT lijuan acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT sunlei acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT gaolei acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT liufeng acomparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT yangbo comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT wangfengchun comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT louyanhua comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT lijuan comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT sunlei comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT gaolei comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst
AT liufeng comparisonofclinicalefficacybetweendifferentsurgicalapproachesforpoplitealcyst