Cargando…

Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) (i.e., anterior chamber IOL [ACIOL], suture-fixated posterior chamber IOL [PCIOL], and glue-fixated PCIOL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Santosh, Singh, Satyaprakash, Singh, Gyanendra, Rajwade, Nilesh S., Bhalerao, Sushank A., Singh, Vinod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118496
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_134_2016
_version_ 1783273832755232768
author Kumar, Santosh
Singh, Satyaprakash
Singh, Gyanendra
Rajwade, Nilesh S.
Bhalerao, Sushank A.
Singh, Vinod
author_facet Kumar, Santosh
Singh, Satyaprakash
Singh, Gyanendra
Rajwade, Nilesh S.
Bhalerao, Sushank A.
Singh, Vinod
author_sort Kumar, Santosh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) (i.e., anterior chamber IOL [ACIOL], suture-fixated posterior chamber IOL [PCIOL], and glue-fixated PCIOL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, prospective, interventional, comparative, clinical trial study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients of either sex having aphakia and lacking posterior capsular support were included in the study, and patients having corneal or scleral pathology, optic atrophy, uncontrolled glaucoma, retinal detachment, and other retinal pathology were excluded from the study. The patients were divided into three groups after comprehensive ophthalmological examination – Group A (secondary ACIOL) included 44 patients, Group B (secondary scleral-fixated sutured PCIOL) included 32 patients, and Group C (fibrin glue-fixated sutured PCIOL) included 34 patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included in this study, of which 59 (53.63%) were males and 51 (46.37%) were females. The best-corrected visual acuity (VA) after 6 weeks was in the range of 20/60–20/40 in 36.4% of Group A and 40.6% of Group B patients. In Group C, 52.9% of patients had best-corrected VA in the range of 20/30–20/20. The overall complications were less in glued PCIOL group. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that fibrin glue-assisted PCIOL implantation provides better visual outcome with minimal complications in eyes with deficient capsular support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5657163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56571632017-11-08 Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens Kumar, Santosh Singh, Satyaprakash Singh, Gyanendra Rajwade, Nilesh S. Bhalerao, Sushank A. Singh, Vinod Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) (i.e., anterior chamber IOL [ACIOL], suture-fixated posterior chamber IOL [PCIOL], and glue-fixated PCIOL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, prospective, interventional, comparative, clinical trial study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients of either sex having aphakia and lacking posterior capsular support were included in the study, and patients having corneal or scleral pathology, optic atrophy, uncontrolled glaucoma, retinal detachment, and other retinal pathology were excluded from the study. The patients were divided into three groups after comprehensive ophthalmological examination – Group A (secondary ACIOL) included 44 patients, Group B (secondary scleral-fixated sutured PCIOL) included 32 patients, and Group C (fibrin glue-fixated sutured PCIOL) included 34 patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included in this study, of which 59 (53.63%) were males and 51 (46.37%) were females. The best-corrected visual acuity (VA) after 6 weeks was in the range of 20/60–20/40 in 36.4% of Group A and 40.6% of Group B patients. In Group C, 52.9% of patients had best-corrected VA in the range of 20/30–20/20. The overall complications were less in glued PCIOL group. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that fibrin glue-assisted PCIOL implantation provides better visual outcome with minimal complications in eyes with deficient capsular support. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5657163/ /pubmed/29118496 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_134_2016 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Santosh
Singh, Satyaprakash
Singh, Gyanendra
Rajwade, Nilesh S.
Bhalerao, Sushank A.
Singh, Vinod
Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
title Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
title_full Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
title_fullStr Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
title_full_unstemmed Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
title_short Visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
title_sort visual outcome and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118496
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_134_2016
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarsantosh visualoutcomeandcomplicationsofvarioustechniquesofsecondaryintraocularlens
AT singhsatyaprakash visualoutcomeandcomplicationsofvarioustechniquesofsecondaryintraocularlens
AT singhgyanendra visualoutcomeandcomplicationsofvarioustechniquesofsecondaryintraocularlens
AT rajwadenileshs visualoutcomeandcomplicationsofvarioustechniquesofsecondaryintraocularlens
AT bhaleraosushanka visualoutcomeandcomplicationsofvarioustechniquesofsecondaryintraocularlens
AT singhvinod visualoutcomeandcomplicationsofvarioustechniquesofsecondaryintraocularlens