Cargando…
Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) universally recurs with dismal prognosis. We evaluated the efficacy of standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). From two centers in the Netherlands, 299 patients with rGBM after first-line treatment, diagnosed between 2005 and 2014, were ret...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2564-z |
_version_ | 1783274004596916224 |
---|---|
author | van Linde, Myra E. Brahm, Cyrillo G. de Witt Hamer, Philip C. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Bruynzeel, Anna M. E. Vandertop, W. Peter van de Ven, Peter M. Wagemakers, Michiel van der Weide, Hiske L. Enting, Roelien H. Walenkamp, Annemiek M. E. Verheul, Henk M. W. |
author_facet | van Linde, Myra E. Brahm, Cyrillo G. de Witt Hamer, Philip C. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Bruynzeel, Anna M. E. Vandertop, W. Peter van de Ven, Peter M. Wagemakers, Michiel van der Weide, Hiske L. Enting, Roelien H. Walenkamp, Annemiek M. E. Verheul, Henk M. W. |
author_sort | van Linde, Myra E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) universally recurs with dismal prognosis. We evaluated the efficacy of standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). From two centers in the Netherlands, 299 patients with rGBM after first-line treatment, diagnosed between 2005 and 2014, were retrospectively evaluated. Four different treatment strategies were defined: systemic treatment (SYST), re-irradiation (RT), re-resection followed by adjuvant treatment (SURG) and best supportive care (BSC). Median OS for all patients was 6.5 months, and median PFS (excluding patients receiving BSC) was 5.5 months. Older age, multifocal lesions and steroid use were significantly associated with a shorter survival. After correction for confounders, patients receiving SYST (34.8%) and SURG (18.7%) had a significantly longer survival than patients receiving BSC (39.5%), 7.3 and 11.0 versus 3.1 months, respectively [HR 0.46 (p < 0.001) and 0.36 (p < 0.001)]. Median survival for patients receiving RT (7.0%) was 9.2 months, but this was not significantly different from patients receiving BSC (p = 0.068). Patients receiving SURG compared to SYST had a longer PFS (9.0 vs. 4.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001), but no difference in OS was observed. After adjustments for confounders, patients with rGBM selected for treatment with SURG or SYST do survive significantly longer than patients who are selected for BSC based on clinical parameters. The value of reoperation versus systemic treatment strategies needs further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2564-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5658463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56584632017-11-03 Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis van Linde, Myra E. Brahm, Cyrillo G. de Witt Hamer, Philip C. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Bruynzeel, Anna M. E. Vandertop, W. Peter van de Ven, Peter M. Wagemakers, Michiel van der Weide, Hiske L. Enting, Roelien H. Walenkamp, Annemiek M. E. Verheul, Henk M. W. J Neurooncol Clinical Study Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) universally recurs with dismal prognosis. We evaluated the efficacy of standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). From two centers in the Netherlands, 299 patients with rGBM after first-line treatment, diagnosed between 2005 and 2014, were retrospectively evaluated. Four different treatment strategies were defined: systemic treatment (SYST), re-irradiation (RT), re-resection followed by adjuvant treatment (SURG) and best supportive care (BSC). Median OS for all patients was 6.5 months, and median PFS (excluding patients receiving BSC) was 5.5 months. Older age, multifocal lesions and steroid use were significantly associated with a shorter survival. After correction for confounders, patients receiving SYST (34.8%) and SURG (18.7%) had a significantly longer survival than patients receiving BSC (39.5%), 7.3 and 11.0 versus 3.1 months, respectively [HR 0.46 (p < 0.001) and 0.36 (p < 0.001)]. Median survival for patients receiving RT (7.0%) was 9.2 months, but this was not significantly different from patients receiving BSC (p = 0.068). Patients receiving SURG compared to SYST had a longer PFS (9.0 vs. 4.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001), but no difference in OS was observed. After adjustments for confounders, patients with rGBM selected for treatment with SURG or SYST do survive significantly longer than patients who are selected for BSC based on clinical parameters. The value of reoperation versus systemic treatment strategies needs further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2564-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-07-20 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5658463/ /pubmed/28730289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2564-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study van Linde, Myra E. Brahm, Cyrillo G. de Witt Hamer, Philip C. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Bruynzeel, Anna M. E. Vandertop, W. Peter van de Ven, Peter M. Wagemakers, Michiel van der Weide, Hiske L. Enting, Roelien H. Walenkamp, Annemiek M. E. Verheul, Henk M. W. Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
title | Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
title_full | Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
title_fullStr | Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
title_short | Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
title_sort | treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2564-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanlindemyrae treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT brahmcyrillog treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT dewitthamerphilipc treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT reijneveldjaapc treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT bruynzeelanname treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT vandertopwpeter treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT vandevenpeterm treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT wagemakersmichiel treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT vanderweidehiskel treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT entingroelienh treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT walenkampannemiekme treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis AT verheulhenkmw treatmentoutcomeofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomamultiformearetrospectivemulticenteranalysis |