Cargando…
Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology–pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common [Formula: see text]-value combinations for calculating apparent diffusio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29098169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004 |
_version_ | 1783274031523299328 |
---|---|
author | Hurrell, Sarah L. McGarry, Sean D. Kaczmarowski, Amy Iczkowski, Kenneth A. Jacobsohn, Kenneth Hohenwalter, Mark D. Hall, William A. See, William A. Banerjee, Anjishnu Charles, David K. Nevalainen, Marja T. Mackinnon, Alexander C. LaViolette, Peter S. |
author_facet | Hurrell, Sarah L. McGarry, Sean D. Kaczmarowski, Amy Iczkowski, Kenneth A. Jacobsohn, Kenneth Hohenwalter, Mark D. Hall, William A. See, William A. Banerjee, Anjishnu Charles, David K. Nevalainen, Marja T. Mackinnon, Alexander C. LaViolette, Peter S. |
author_sort | Hurrell, Sarah L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology–pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common [Formula: see text]-value combinations for calculating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty-nine patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were recruited for MP-MRI prior to surgery. Diffusion imaging was collected with seven [Formula: see text]-values, and ADC was calculated. Excised prostates were sliced in the same orientation as the MRI using 3-D printed slicing jigs. Whole-mount slides were digitized and annotated by a pathologist. Annotated samples were aligned to the MRI, and ADC values were extracted from annotated peripheral zone (PZ) regions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine accuracy of tissue type discrimination and optimal ADC [Formula: see text]-value combination. ADC significantly discriminates Gleason (G) G4-5 cancer from G3 and other prostate tissue types. The optimal [Formula: see text]-values for discriminating high from low-grade and noncancerous tissue in the PZ are 50 and 2000, followed closely by 100 to 2000 and 0 to 2000. Optimal ADC cut-offs are presented for dichotomized discrimination of tissue types according to each [Formula: see text]-value combination. Selection of [Formula: see text]-values affects the sensitivity and specificity of ADC for discrimination of prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5658575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56585752018-10-27 Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging Hurrell, Sarah L. McGarry, Sean D. Kaczmarowski, Amy Iczkowski, Kenneth A. Jacobsohn, Kenneth Hohenwalter, Mark D. Hall, William A. See, William A. Banerjee, Anjishnu Charles, David K. Nevalainen, Marja T. Mackinnon, Alexander C. LaViolette, Peter S. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Quantitative Imaging Methods and Translational Developments–Honoring the Memory of Dr. Larry Clarke Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology–pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common [Formula: see text]-value combinations for calculating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty-nine patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were recruited for MP-MRI prior to surgery. Diffusion imaging was collected with seven [Formula: see text]-values, and ADC was calculated. Excised prostates were sliced in the same orientation as the MRI using 3-D printed slicing jigs. Whole-mount slides were digitized and annotated by a pathologist. Annotated samples were aligned to the MRI, and ADC values were extracted from annotated peripheral zone (PZ) regions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine accuracy of tissue type discrimination and optimal ADC [Formula: see text]-value combination. ADC significantly discriminates Gleason (G) G4-5 cancer from G3 and other prostate tissue types. The optimal [Formula: see text]-values for discriminating high from low-grade and noncancerous tissue in the PZ are 50 and 2000, followed closely by 100 to 2000 and 0 to 2000. Optimal ADC cut-offs are presented for dichotomized discrimination of tissue types according to each [Formula: see text]-value combination. Selection of [Formula: see text]-values affects the sensitivity and specificity of ADC for discrimination of prostate cancer. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2017-10-27 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5658575/ /pubmed/29098169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Quantitative Imaging Methods and Translational Developments–Honoring the Memory of Dr. Larry Clarke Hurrell, Sarah L. McGarry, Sean D. Kaczmarowski, Amy Iczkowski, Kenneth A. Jacobsohn, Kenneth Hohenwalter, Mark D. Hall, William A. See, William A. Banerjee, Anjishnu Charles, David K. Nevalainen, Marja T. Mackinnon, Alexander C. LaViolette, Peter S. Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
title | Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
title_full | Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
title_fullStr | Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
title_short | Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
title_sort | optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging |
topic | Quantitative Imaging Methods and Translational Developments–Honoring the Memory of Dr. Larry Clarke |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29098169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurrellsarahl optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT mcgarryseand optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT kaczmarowskiamy optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT iczkowskikennetha optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT jacobsohnkenneth optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT hohenwaltermarkd optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT hallwilliama optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT seewilliama optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT banerjeeanjishnu optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT charlesdavidk optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT nevalainenmarjat optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT mackinnonalexanderc optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging AT laviolettepeters optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging |