Cargando…

Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology–pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common [Formula: see text]-value combinations for calculating apparent diffusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurrell, Sarah L., McGarry, Sean D., Kaczmarowski, Amy, Iczkowski, Kenneth A., Jacobsohn, Kenneth, Hohenwalter, Mark D., Hall, William A., See, William A., Banerjee, Anjishnu, Charles, David K., Nevalainen, Marja T., Mackinnon, Alexander C., LaViolette, Peter S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29098169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004
_version_ 1783274031523299328
author Hurrell, Sarah L.
McGarry, Sean D.
Kaczmarowski, Amy
Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
Jacobsohn, Kenneth
Hohenwalter, Mark D.
Hall, William A.
See, William A.
Banerjee, Anjishnu
Charles, David K.
Nevalainen, Marja T.
Mackinnon, Alexander C.
LaViolette, Peter S.
author_facet Hurrell, Sarah L.
McGarry, Sean D.
Kaczmarowski, Amy
Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
Jacobsohn, Kenneth
Hohenwalter, Mark D.
Hall, William A.
See, William A.
Banerjee, Anjishnu
Charles, David K.
Nevalainen, Marja T.
Mackinnon, Alexander C.
LaViolette, Peter S.
author_sort Hurrell, Sarah L.
collection PubMed
description Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology–pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common [Formula: see text]-value combinations for calculating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty-nine patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were recruited for MP-MRI prior to surgery. Diffusion imaging was collected with seven [Formula: see text]-values, and ADC was calculated. Excised prostates were sliced in the same orientation as the MRI using 3-D printed slicing jigs. Whole-mount slides were digitized and annotated by a pathologist. Annotated samples were aligned to the MRI, and ADC values were extracted from annotated peripheral zone (PZ) regions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine accuracy of tissue type discrimination and optimal ADC [Formula: see text]-value combination. ADC significantly discriminates Gleason (G) G4-5 cancer from G3 and other prostate tissue types. The optimal [Formula: see text]-values for discriminating high from low-grade and noncancerous tissue in the PZ are 50 and 2000, followed closely by 100 to 2000 and 0 to 2000. Optimal ADC cut-offs are presented for dichotomized discrimination of tissue types according to each [Formula: see text]-value combination. Selection of [Formula: see text]-values affects the sensitivity and specificity of ADC for discrimination of prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5658575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56585752018-10-27 Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging Hurrell, Sarah L. McGarry, Sean D. Kaczmarowski, Amy Iczkowski, Kenneth A. Jacobsohn, Kenneth Hohenwalter, Mark D. Hall, William A. See, William A. Banerjee, Anjishnu Charles, David K. Nevalainen, Marja T. Mackinnon, Alexander C. LaViolette, Peter S. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Quantitative Imaging Methods and Translational Developments–Honoring the Memory of Dr. Larry Clarke Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, is commonly used to diagnose prostate cancer. This radiology–pathology study correlates prostate cancer grade and morphology with common [Formula: see text]-value combinations for calculating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Thirty-nine patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were recruited for MP-MRI prior to surgery. Diffusion imaging was collected with seven [Formula: see text]-values, and ADC was calculated. Excised prostates were sliced in the same orientation as the MRI using 3-D printed slicing jigs. Whole-mount slides were digitized and annotated by a pathologist. Annotated samples were aligned to the MRI, and ADC values were extracted from annotated peripheral zone (PZ) regions. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine accuracy of tissue type discrimination and optimal ADC [Formula: see text]-value combination. ADC significantly discriminates Gleason (G) G4-5 cancer from G3 and other prostate tissue types. The optimal [Formula: see text]-values for discriminating high from low-grade and noncancerous tissue in the PZ are 50 and 2000, followed closely by 100 to 2000 and 0 to 2000. Optimal ADC cut-offs are presented for dichotomized discrimination of tissue types according to each [Formula: see text]-value combination. Selection of [Formula: see text]-values affects the sensitivity and specificity of ADC for discrimination of prostate cancer. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2017-10-27 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5658575/ /pubmed/29098169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Quantitative Imaging Methods and Translational Developments–Honoring the Memory of Dr. Larry Clarke
Hurrell, Sarah L.
McGarry, Sean D.
Kaczmarowski, Amy
Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
Jacobsohn, Kenneth
Hohenwalter, Mark D.
Hall, William A.
See, William A.
Banerjee, Anjishnu
Charles, David K.
Nevalainen, Marja T.
Mackinnon, Alexander C.
LaViolette, Peter S.
Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
title Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
title_full Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
title_fullStr Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
title_full_unstemmed Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
title_short Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
title_sort optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
topic Quantitative Imaging Methods and Translational Developments–Honoring the Memory of Dr. Larry Clarke
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29098169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011004
work_keys_str_mv AT hurrellsarahl optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT mcgarryseand optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT kaczmarowskiamy optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT iczkowskikennetha optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT jacobsohnkenneth optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT hohenwaltermarkd optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT hallwilliama optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT seewilliama optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT banerjeeanjishnu optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT charlesdavidk optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT nevalainenmarjat optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT mackinnonalexanderc optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging
AT laviolettepeters optimizedbvalueselectionforthediscriminationofprostatecancergradesincludingthecribriformpatternusingdiffusionweightedimaging