Cargando…

The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage

Ensilage provides an effective means of conserving summer‐grown green forage to supply as winter feed to ruminants. The fermentation process involved in the ensilage process relies on lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Here, 16S ribosomal DNA amplicon pyrosequencing was used to follow the dynamic behaviour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gharechahi, Javad, Kharazian, Zohreh Akhavan, Sarikhan, Sajjad, Jouzani, Gholamreza Salehi, Aghdasi, Mahnaz, Hosseini Salekdeh, Ghasem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28696065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12751
_version_ 1783274034406883328
author Gharechahi, Javad
Kharazian, Zohreh Akhavan
Sarikhan, Sajjad
Jouzani, Gholamreza Salehi
Aghdasi, Mahnaz
Hosseini Salekdeh, Ghasem
author_facet Gharechahi, Javad
Kharazian, Zohreh Akhavan
Sarikhan, Sajjad
Jouzani, Gholamreza Salehi
Aghdasi, Mahnaz
Hosseini Salekdeh, Ghasem
author_sort Gharechahi, Javad
collection PubMed
description Ensilage provides an effective means of conserving summer‐grown green forage to supply as winter feed to ruminants. The fermentation process involved in the ensilage process relies on lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Here, 16S ribosomal DNA amplicon pyrosequencing was used to follow the dynamic behaviour of the LAB community during the ensilage of maize biomass, with a view to identify the key species involved in the process. The biomass used for ensilage was a single‐cross maize hybrid, harvested at the milk‐line stage. The crop was grown at three contrasting locations. Aspects of the physico‐chemical composition of the material and the LAB species present were sampled at 0, 3, 6, 14, 21 and 32 days after ensilage was initiated. In all three cases, members of the Leuconostocaceae family dominated the epiphytic bacterial community, notably Leuconostoc and Weissella, but some variation was noted in the abundance of certain Leuconostocaceae and Lactobacillaceae species, as well as that of some Acetobacteraceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxellaceae species. The constellation of the microbiome which developed during the ensilage process differed markedly from that of the epiphytic one, with Lactobacillaceae, particularly Lactobacillus and Pediococcus spp. dominating. The abundance of heterofermentative Leuconostocaceae spp. in the epiphytic community and the extent of the transition from hetero‐ to homo‐fermentation during the initial ensilage period are important factors in determining silage quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5658587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56585872017-11-01 The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage Gharechahi, Javad Kharazian, Zohreh Akhavan Sarikhan, Sajjad Jouzani, Gholamreza Salehi Aghdasi, Mahnaz Hosseini Salekdeh, Ghasem Microb Biotechnol Research Articles Ensilage provides an effective means of conserving summer‐grown green forage to supply as winter feed to ruminants. The fermentation process involved in the ensilage process relies on lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Here, 16S ribosomal DNA amplicon pyrosequencing was used to follow the dynamic behaviour of the LAB community during the ensilage of maize biomass, with a view to identify the key species involved in the process. The biomass used for ensilage was a single‐cross maize hybrid, harvested at the milk‐line stage. The crop was grown at three contrasting locations. Aspects of the physico‐chemical composition of the material and the LAB species present were sampled at 0, 3, 6, 14, 21 and 32 days after ensilage was initiated. In all three cases, members of the Leuconostocaceae family dominated the epiphytic bacterial community, notably Leuconostoc and Weissella, but some variation was noted in the abundance of certain Leuconostocaceae and Lactobacillaceae species, as well as that of some Acetobacteraceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxellaceae species. The constellation of the microbiome which developed during the ensilage process differed markedly from that of the epiphytic one, with Lactobacillaceae, particularly Lactobacillus and Pediococcus spp. dominating. The abundance of heterofermentative Leuconostocaceae spp. in the epiphytic community and the extent of the transition from hetero‐ to homo‐fermentation during the initial ensilage period are important factors in determining silage quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5658587/ /pubmed/28696065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12751 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gharechahi, Javad
Kharazian, Zohreh Akhavan
Sarikhan, Sajjad
Jouzani, Gholamreza Salehi
Aghdasi, Mahnaz
Hosseini Salekdeh, Ghasem
The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
title The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
title_full The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
title_fullStr The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
title_full_unstemmed The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
title_short The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
title_sort dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28696065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12751
work_keys_str_mv AT gharechahijavad thedynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT kharazianzohrehakhavan thedynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT sarikhansajjad thedynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT jouzanigholamrezasalehi thedynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT aghdasimahnaz thedynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT hosseinisalekdehghasem thedynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT gharechahijavad dynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT kharazianzohrehakhavan dynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT sarikhansajjad dynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT jouzanigholamrezasalehi dynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT aghdasimahnaz dynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage
AT hosseinisalekdehghasem dynamicsofthebacterialcommunitiesdevelopedinmaizesilage