Cargando…
Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada
BACKGROUND: In 2008, a revised set of public health standards was released in the province of Ontario, Canada. The updated Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS) introduced a new policy mandate that required local public health units (PHUs) to identify “priority populations” for public health progra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29078814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0677-9 |
_version_ | 1783274071685857280 |
---|---|
author | Hassen, Nadha Tyler, Ingrid Manson, Heather |
author_facet | Hassen, Nadha Tyler, Ingrid Manson, Heather |
author_sort | Hassen, Nadha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2008, a revised set of public health standards was released in the province of Ontario, Canada. The updated Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS) introduced a new policy mandate that required local public health units (PHUs) to identify “priority populations” for public health programs and services. The aim of this study was to understand how this Priority Populations Mandate (PPM) facilitated or hindered action on health equity or the social determinants of health through PHUs in Ontario. METHODS: This study used two sets of qualitative data that were part of a larger study. The first set of data was 16 semi-structured key informant interviews with policymakers involved in developing the OPHS and public health practitioners. The second set of data was the qualitative component of a role-based survey sent out to all the 36 PHUs in Ontario. Thematic content analysis was conducted to iteratively develop themes to answer the research question. RESULTS: We identified six factors that both facilitated and hindered action on health equity and social determinants of health action in the province resulting from the OPHS and PPM. These six factors were grouped into three categories or themes: OPHS policy attributes (1. introducing new terminology, 2. allowing flexibility in implementation and 3. ensuring evidence-informed decision-making), health sector context into which the PPM was introduced (4. different understandings of health equity and 5. variability in existing partnerships) and implementation by PHUs (6. requirement to address the PPM). CONCLUSIONS: Although the revised OPHS and the PPM facilitated action on health equity and the social determinants of health, on the whole, this objective could have been better met. The mandate within the OPHS could have been strengthened with respect to promoting action on health equity and the social determinants of health through more clearly defined terminology, conveying a guiding health equity vision and uniting different PHU approaches to addressing health equity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5658905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56589052017-10-31 Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada Hassen, Nadha Tyler, Ingrid Manson, Heather Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: In 2008, a revised set of public health standards was released in the province of Ontario, Canada. The updated Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS) introduced a new policy mandate that required local public health units (PHUs) to identify “priority populations” for public health programs and services. The aim of this study was to understand how this Priority Populations Mandate (PPM) facilitated or hindered action on health equity or the social determinants of health through PHUs in Ontario. METHODS: This study used two sets of qualitative data that were part of a larger study. The first set of data was 16 semi-structured key informant interviews with policymakers involved in developing the OPHS and public health practitioners. The second set of data was the qualitative component of a role-based survey sent out to all the 36 PHUs in Ontario. Thematic content analysis was conducted to iteratively develop themes to answer the research question. RESULTS: We identified six factors that both facilitated and hindered action on health equity and social determinants of health action in the province resulting from the OPHS and PPM. These six factors were grouped into three categories or themes: OPHS policy attributes (1. introducing new terminology, 2. allowing flexibility in implementation and 3. ensuring evidence-informed decision-making), health sector context into which the PPM was introduced (4. different understandings of health equity and 5. variability in existing partnerships) and implementation by PHUs (6. requirement to address the PPM). CONCLUSIONS: Although the revised OPHS and the PPM facilitated action on health equity and the social determinants of health, on the whole, this objective could have been better met. The mandate within the OPHS could have been strengthened with respect to promoting action on health equity and the social determinants of health through more clearly defined terminology, conveying a guiding health equity vision and uniting different PHU approaches to addressing health equity. BioMed Central 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5658905/ /pubmed/29078814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0677-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hassen, Nadha Tyler, Ingrid Manson, Heather Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada |
title | Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada |
title_full | Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada |
title_fullStr | Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada |
title_short | Influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada |
title_sort | influence of revised public health standards on health equity action: a qualitative study in ontario, canada |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29078814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0677-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassennadha influenceofrevisedpublichealthstandardsonhealthequityactionaqualitativestudyinontariocanada AT tyleringrid influenceofrevisedpublichealthstandardsonhealthequityactionaqualitativestudyinontariocanada AT mansonheather influenceofrevisedpublichealthstandardsonhealthequityactionaqualitativestudyinontariocanada |