Cargando…

Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance

BACKGROUND: Mitochondria are predominantly inherited from the maternal gamete, even in unicellular organisms. Yet an extraordinary array of mechanisms enforce uniparental inheritance, which implies shifting selection pressures and multiple origins. RESULTS: We consider how this high turnover in mech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radzvilavicius, Arunas L., Lane, Nick, Pomiankowski, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29073898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0437-8
_version_ 1783274078975557632
author Radzvilavicius, Arunas L.
Lane, Nick
Pomiankowski, Andrew
author_facet Radzvilavicius, Arunas L.
Lane, Nick
Pomiankowski, Andrew
author_sort Radzvilavicius, Arunas L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mitochondria are predominantly inherited from the maternal gamete, even in unicellular organisms. Yet an extraordinary array of mechanisms enforce uniparental inheritance, which implies shifting selection pressures and multiple origins. RESULTS: We consider how this high turnover in mechanisms controlling uniparental inheritance arises using a novel evolutionary model in which control of mitochondrial transmission occurs either during spermatogenesis (by paternal nuclear genes) or at/after fertilization (by maternal nuclear genes). The model treats paternal leakage as an evolvable trait. Our evolutionary analysis shows that maternal control consistently favours strict uniparental inheritance with complete exclusion of sperm mitochondria, whereas some degree of paternal leakage of mitochondria is an expected outcome under paternal control. This difference arises because mito-nuclear linkage builds up with maternal control, allowing the greater variance created by asymmetric inheritance to boost the efficiency of purifying selection and bring benefits in the long term. In contrast, under paternal control, mito-nuclear linkage tends to be much weaker, giving greater advantage to the mixing of cytotypes, which improves mean fitness in the short term, even though it imposes a fitness cost to both mating types in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual conflict is an inevitable outcome when there is competition between maternal and paternal control of mitochondrial inheritance. If evolution has led to complete uniparental inheritance through maternal control, it creates selective pressure on the paternal nucleus in favour of subversion through paternal leakage, and vice versa. This selective divergence provides a reason for the repeated evolution of novel mechanisms that regulate the transmission of paternal mitochondria, both in the fertilized egg and spermatogenesis. Our analysis suggests that the widespread occurrence of paternal leakage and prevalence of heteroplasmy are natural outcomes of this sexual conflict. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0437-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5658935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56589352017-10-31 Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance Radzvilavicius, Arunas L. Lane, Nick Pomiankowski, Andrew BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Mitochondria are predominantly inherited from the maternal gamete, even in unicellular organisms. Yet an extraordinary array of mechanisms enforce uniparental inheritance, which implies shifting selection pressures and multiple origins. RESULTS: We consider how this high turnover in mechanisms controlling uniparental inheritance arises using a novel evolutionary model in which control of mitochondrial transmission occurs either during spermatogenesis (by paternal nuclear genes) or at/after fertilization (by maternal nuclear genes). The model treats paternal leakage as an evolvable trait. Our evolutionary analysis shows that maternal control consistently favours strict uniparental inheritance with complete exclusion of sperm mitochondria, whereas some degree of paternal leakage of mitochondria is an expected outcome under paternal control. This difference arises because mito-nuclear linkage builds up with maternal control, allowing the greater variance created by asymmetric inheritance to boost the efficiency of purifying selection and bring benefits in the long term. In contrast, under paternal control, mito-nuclear linkage tends to be much weaker, giving greater advantage to the mixing of cytotypes, which improves mean fitness in the short term, even though it imposes a fitness cost to both mating types in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual conflict is an inevitable outcome when there is competition between maternal and paternal control of mitochondrial inheritance. If evolution has led to complete uniparental inheritance through maternal control, it creates selective pressure on the paternal nucleus in favour of subversion through paternal leakage, and vice versa. This selective divergence provides a reason for the repeated evolution of novel mechanisms that regulate the transmission of paternal mitochondria, both in the fertilized egg and spermatogenesis. Our analysis suggests that the widespread occurrence of paternal leakage and prevalence of heteroplasmy are natural outcomes of this sexual conflict. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0437-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5658935/ /pubmed/29073898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0437-8 Text en © Pomiankowski et al. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Radzvilavicius, Arunas L.
Lane, Nick
Pomiankowski, Andrew
Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
title Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
title_full Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
title_fullStr Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
title_full_unstemmed Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
title_short Sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
title_sort sexual conflict explains the extraordinary diversity of mechanisms regulating mitochondrial inheritance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5658935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29073898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0437-8
work_keys_str_mv AT radzvilaviciusarunasl sexualconflictexplainstheextraordinarydiversityofmechanismsregulatingmitochondrialinheritance
AT lanenick sexualconflictexplainstheextraordinarydiversityofmechanismsregulatingmitochondrialinheritance
AT pomiankowskiandrew sexualconflictexplainstheextraordinarydiversityofmechanismsregulatingmitochondrialinheritance