Cargando…

Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Most research on multidimensional frailty focuses on deficits and risks of adverse outcomes. However, although some frail older people report a low quality of life (QoL), others still report a relatively high QoL. More knowledge about these discrepancies might give new insight into devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Vorst, Anne, Zijlstra, G. A. Rixt, De Witte, Nico, Vogel, Ruth G. M., Schols, Jos M. G. A., Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29073908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0641-y
_version_ 1783274101441298432
author van der Vorst, Anne
Zijlstra, G. A. Rixt
De Witte, Nico
Vogel, Ruth G. M.
Schols, Jos M. G. A.
Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M.
author_facet van der Vorst, Anne
Zijlstra, G. A. Rixt
De Witte, Nico
Vogel, Ruth G. M.
Schols, Jos M. G. A.
Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M.
author_sort van der Vorst, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most research on multidimensional frailty focuses on deficits and risks of adverse outcomes. However, although some frail older people report a low quality of life (QoL), others still report a relatively high QoL. More knowledge about these discrepancies might give new insight into developing frailty prevention strategies. Therefore, this mixed-method study aimed (a) to identify characteristics related to QoL among frail older people; and (b) to explain discrepancies between higher and lower levels of QoL, with a specific interest in identifying strengths frail older people with a higher QoL still have. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were held with community-dwelling, frail older people with higher (n = 16) and lower levels of QoL (n = 18). Frailty was assessed with the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument, which measures environmental, physical, psychological, and social frailty. Other quantitative measures included socio-demographic characteristics, overall QoL, meaning in life, and mastery. The qualitative part focused on the meaning and maintenance of QoL (among other factors), despite being frail. Possible explanations for discrepancies in QoL were explored. RESULTS: Frail older people with a higher QoL were older, had lower levels of psychological frailty, and reported higher meaning in life compared to those with a lower QoL. Outcomes of qualitative analysis showed that participants in the high QoL subgroup adapted more effectively to difficulties, had more things in prospect, performed more activities, and were more satisfied with their social network compared to the low QoL subgroup. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study suggests possibilities to promote and improve QoL by strengthening specific resources among frail older people. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-017-0641-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5659025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56590252017-11-01 Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study van der Vorst, Anne Zijlstra, G. A. Rixt De Witte, Nico Vogel, Ruth G. M. Schols, Jos M. G. A. Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Most research on multidimensional frailty focuses on deficits and risks of adverse outcomes. However, although some frail older people report a low quality of life (QoL), others still report a relatively high QoL. More knowledge about these discrepancies might give new insight into developing frailty prevention strategies. Therefore, this mixed-method study aimed (a) to identify characteristics related to QoL among frail older people; and (b) to explain discrepancies between higher and lower levels of QoL, with a specific interest in identifying strengths frail older people with a higher QoL still have. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were held with community-dwelling, frail older people with higher (n = 16) and lower levels of QoL (n = 18). Frailty was assessed with the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument, which measures environmental, physical, psychological, and social frailty. Other quantitative measures included socio-demographic characteristics, overall QoL, meaning in life, and mastery. The qualitative part focused on the meaning and maintenance of QoL (among other factors), despite being frail. Possible explanations for discrepancies in QoL were explored. RESULTS: Frail older people with a higher QoL were older, had lower levels of psychological frailty, and reported higher meaning in life compared to those with a lower QoL. Outcomes of qualitative analysis showed that participants in the high QoL subgroup adapted more effectively to difficulties, had more things in prospect, performed more activities, and were more satisfied with their social network compared to the low QoL subgroup. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study suggests possibilities to promote and improve QoL by strengthening specific resources among frail older people. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-017-0641-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5659025/ /pubmed/29073908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0641-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Vorst, Anne
Zijlstra, G. A. Rixt
De Witte, Nico
Vogel, Ruth G. M.
Schols, Jos M. G. A.
Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M.
Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
title Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
title_full Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
title_short Explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
title_sort explaining discrepancies in self-reported quality of life in frail older people: a mixed-methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29073908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0641-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervorstanne explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy
AT zijlstragarixt explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy
AT dewittenico explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy
AT vogelruthgm explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy
AT scholsjosmga explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy
AT kempengertrudisijm explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy
AT explainingdiscrepanciesinselfreportedqualityoflifeinfrailolderpeopleamixedmethodsstudy