Cargando…

Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective

Accurate description of the intrinsic preferences of amino acids is important to consider when developing a biomolecular force field. In this study, we use a modern energy partitioning approach called Interacting Quantum Atoms to inspect the cause of the φ and ψ torsional preferences of three dipept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maxwell, Peter I., Popelier, Paul L. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24904
_version_ 1783274124591759360
author Maxwell, Peter I.
Popelier, Paul L. A.
author_facet Maxwell, Peter I.
Popelier, Paul L. A.
author_sort Maxwell, Peter I.
collection PubMed
description Accurate description of the intrinsic preferences of amino acids is important to consider when developing a biomolecular force field. In this study, we use a modern energy partitioning approach called Interacting Quantum Atoms to inspect the cause of the φ and ψ torsional preferences of three dipeptides (Gly, Val, and Ile). Repeating energy trends at each of the molecular, functional group, and atomic levels are observed across both (1) the three amino acids and (2) the φ/ψ scans in Ramachandran plots. At the molecular level, it is surprisingly electrostatic destabilization that causes the high‐energy regions in the Ramachandran plot, not molecular steric hindrance (related to the intra‐atomic energy). At the functional group and atomic levels, the importance of key peptide atoms (O(i) (–1), C(i), N(i), N(i) (+1)) and some sidechain hydrogen atoms (H(γ)) are identified as responsible for the destabilization seen in the energetically disfavored Ramachandran regions. Consistently, the O(i) (–1) atoms are particularly important for the explanation of dipeptide intrinsic behavior, where electrostatic and steric destabilization unusually complement one another. The findings suggest that, at least for these dipeptides, it is the peptide group atoms that dominate the intrinsic behavior, more so than the sidechain atoms. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5659141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56591412017-11-03 Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective Maxwell, Peter I. Popelier, Paul L. A. J Comput Chem Full Papers Accurate description of the intrinsic preferences of amino acids is important to consider when developing a biomolecular force field. In this study, we use a modern energy partitioning approach called Interacting Quantum Atoms to inspect the cause of the φ and ψ torsional preferences of three dipeptides (Gly, Val, and Ile). Repeating energy trends at each of the molecular, functional group, and atomic levels are observed across both (1) the three amino acids and (2) the φ/ψ scans in Ramachandran plots. At the molecular level, it is surprisingly electrostatic destabilization that causes the high‐energy regions in the Ramachandran plot, not molecular steric hindrance (related to the intra‐atomic energy). At the functional group and atomic levels, the importance of key peptide atoms (O(i) (–1), C(i), N(i), N(i) (+1)) and some sidechain hydrogen atoms (H(γ)) are identified as responsible for the destabilization seen in the energetically disfavored Ramachandran regions. Consistently, the O(i) (–1) atoms are particularly important for the explanation of dipeptide intrinsic behavior, where electrostatic and steric destabilization unusually complement one another. The findings suggest that, at least for these dipeptides, it is the peptide group atoms that dominate the intrinsic behavior, more so than the sidechain atoms. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-25 2017-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5659141/ /pubmed/28841241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24904 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Maxwell, Peter I.
Popelier, Paul L. A.
Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective
title Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective
title_full Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective
title_fullStr Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective
title_full_unstemmed Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective
title_short Unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: Is it really steric hindrance? The interacting quantum atoms perspective
title_sort unfavorable regions in the ramachandran plot: is it really steric hindrance? the interacting quantum atoms perspective
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24904
work_keys_str_mv AT maxwellpeteri unfavorableregionsintheramachandranplotisitreallysterichindrancetheinteractingquantumatomsperspective
AT popelierpaulla unfavorableregionsintheramachandranplotisitreallysterichindrancetheinteractingquantumatomsperspective